You really believe that?
Yes, its true, that is the ranking, which shows how fake this ranking system is. Do what the ATP does, weight it.
Beat a top side, get big points. beat a lowly side get naff all
Pakis too until they worked out our conditions then they hammered us
AUS hammered ENG
ENG lost 12 tests in a row, or similar?
Then we get a win and a draw and we are No.3? After how badly we bat? Thank Mr Southee and Mr Boult. Great as they are and how the lesser batsmen have often saved us, thats not No.3, sorry
The ICC rankings do weight performance based on who you are playing. They are based over 4 years with more recent games given higher significance. The rankings look pretty much correct at the moment.
India and South Africa form the top group. They are the two best sides in the world at the moment.
Then a fair way back in a group are NZ, England Australia and Sri Lanka. They can all beat each other, with the home side generally winning.
Pakistan are a tier to themselves with the West Indies and Bangladesh in a group and then miles away are Zimbabwe being absolutely awful.
What would your rankings be if you think they are fake?