Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 
1592 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 369


  Reply # 1994768 12-Apr-2018 12:19
2 people support this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Here are links to two scientific papers citing extensive research that concludes that there is no evidence that transgender athletes have a competitive advantage. This has been accepted by international competitive sports bodies including the IOC. 

 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-016-0621-y

 

http://www.caaws.ca/e/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Devries_lit_review2.pdf

 

I can find many more papers like this, but I don't see much point since the armchair experts here clearly know so much better.

 

 

I read that second paper very differently to you. First of all it, it is primarily a comparison of "physically born men" with "physically born women" and not transitioned athletes.

 

It certainly does not answer the question "Do Transitioned Athletes Compete at an Advantage or Disadvantage as compared with Physically Born Men and Women" with any conclusion other than that there is not enough data to draw any conclusion.

 

Read the conclusions again:

 

1. Overall conclusion is that there is not enough data.

 

2. Performance data was not taken from transitioned athletes. The literature review is almost entirely based on the scientific study of non-transitioned people.

 

3. No exercise tests were used.

 

4. The only relevant study was severely limited. It was restropective, only considered muscle mass and haemoglobin, and did not measure actual athletic performance.

 

5. Actual "performance during athletic events needs to be assessed"

 

6. The data "does not appear to suggest that transitioned athletes would compete at an advantage or disadvantage as compared with physically born men and women

 

7. There is not enough research to form a consensus.

 

8. "... we may never truly know whether transitioned athletes compete at an advantage or disadvantage as compared with physically born men and women."

 

The following is the most representative quote:

 

 

6.3 Based on the evidence presented above, would either transitioned men or women compete at an advantage against physically born men and women?

 

Based on the evidence above, to date there is really no concrete evidence to support or refute that transitioned men or women would compete at an advantage as compared with physically born men and women.

 

 

Using your approach is like arguing that non-terran aliens exist simply because we don't have enough concrete evidence to show that they do or don't exist.

 

 

 

 


4556 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1828


  Reply # 1994771 12-Apr-2018 12:23
2 people support this post
Send private message

@Hammerer: nice summary.  You nailed it.





Mike

Mad Scientist
18619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2365

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1994774 12-Apr-2018 12:26
Send private message

it all boils down to the people's misunderstanding of the word evidence. There are 3 things, evidence, conclusions, but when people read something they jump on the word evidence as proof. When in fact, evidence is just what we see. The conclusion is what we can say from all the evidence (what we see) presented and lumped together. Proof? Well, there is very very very rarely enough evidence to have proof, even though people like to think there is. Most of the time, we really don't know. But people don't like to say we don't know.


4556 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1828


  Reply # 1994845 12-Apr-2018 13:19
Send private message

Batman:

 

it all boils down to the people's misunderstanding of the word evidence. There are 3 things, evidence, conclusions, but when people read something they jump on the word evidence as proof. When in fact, evidence is just what we see. The conclusion is what we can say from all the evidence (what we see) presented and lumped together. Proof? Well, there is very very very rarely enough evidence to have proof, even though people like to think there is. Most of the time, we really don't know. But people don't like to say we don't know.

 

 

Evidence can also mean different things in legal and scientific contexts.





Mike

Mad Scientist
18619 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2365

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1994904 12-Apr-2018 14:43
Send private message

Yes and I thought they are having a non legal, scientific debate.

3477 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1251

Subscriber

  Reply # 1994914 12-Apr-2018 15:01
2 people support this post
Send private message

Using your approach is like arguing that non-terran aliens exist simply because we don't have enough concrete evidence to show that they do or don't exist.

 

Isn't that the first thing you learn in Science... Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


12564 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2229

Trusted

  Reply # 1995151 13-Apr-2018 08:49
3 people support this post
Send private message

I'll say it again. This thread is about a performance advantage being unfair. It is not about discriminating against trans people. There is no proof they have an advantage, there is no proof they do not have an advantage. Until there is proof, there can be no change to allow a male born person who changed to female identity competing against women.

 

If the numbers are growing, a new Transgender category. If a certain sport requires only skill and not strength/endurance, they can complete in female competitions  


4556 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1828


  Reply # 1996974 16-Apr-2018 12:45
Send private message

Batman: Yes and I thought they are having a non legal, scientific debate.

 

It's rule making, based on science.  So legal and scientific influences.





Mike

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Hawaiki Transpacific cable ready-for-service
Posted 20-Jul-2018 11:29


Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.