Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4

BTR

1522 posts

Uber Geek


  #1128849 15-Sep-2014 10:34
Send private message

Seems a stupid idea to me, its always fogged in and when its not its windy as hell. Welcome to New Zealand where you will be blown away.... Literally. 

Why not spend the money on fixing the trains or building a fence around parliament to house the Zoo animals.

15336 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1128850 15-Sep-2014 10:35
Send private message

Always fogged in?????? not really




Mike

 

Consultant

 


The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


 
 
 
 


3581 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1128900 15-Sep-2014 11:13
Send private message

There's more to this than simply extending the runway. For instance, congestion, which is quite bad at peak times, needs dealing with, docking/handling/lounge facilities would need expanding, car parking would need expanding - would the Public Works Act be coming to the fore to get some of the land needed for this?

I laughed when I read the line "The EY report does not attempt a cost-benefit analysis" - instead it relies on a series of three made up scenarios of what EY see as possible traffic flows. This is then extrapolated out to net benefits for the national economy (not regional) based on tourist flows into the country increasing - something that is reasonably likely to happen anyway, not just because an extension is built in Wellington. Oh, and all this is by 40 years after the extension is completed.

The thought of very large planes coming here with the heavy wind conditions we experience sits a little uneasily with me.

1558 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1128901 15-Sep-2014 11:13
Send private message

dcole13:



I don't really think they need an international airport past QLD/NSW and the Pacific Islands. If they want to go further, it's not that hard to fly to Auckland or Christchurch.


Also good to compare to Canberra, both capital cities with about the same population. In that respect, Wellington is already better served internationally.  Even if the runway were longer, the population is not there to support frequent long haul destinations so most will still travel via Auckland or a hub airport in Australia.

Canberra airport is constructing an International terminal at the moment, would be wise to see how that pans out before doing any works in Wellington.

2438 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1128921 15-Sep-2014 11:37
Send private message

Given that the airport company paid for the EY report, I would not consider it to be independent nor unbiased. The airport company is fishing for a subsidy

14694 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1128957 15-Sep-2014 12:11
Send private message

wongtop: Any aviation geeks want to chime in here.  According to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellington_International_Airport the existing runway is too short for even the B737 or the A320 to take off at MTOW.  In order for long haul flights to be viable I would have thought that they would need to be operating around MTOW to allow for enough passangers and cargo for good load factors.  I don't see how a mere 300 metre extension would allow this.  My understanding is that the take off lengths for B787 and A350 at MTOW are up near 3000 metres, while the extended runway will still only be ~2400 m.  Or am I mistaken?


Build a new airport in Masterton and a new 300kmh train between there and the city centre.

Or move Parliament, name Auckland as political capital as well as economic one and let Wellington revert to the Picton of the north island.





2420 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1128990 15-Sep-2014 13:21
Send private message

Yes move capital to Auckland.... watch the house prices.

Will be funny for those of us who don't live there.
.
Or you could move it to Christchurch as they already have an international airport

A.


 
 
 
 


2078 posts

Uber Geek


  #1129059 15-Sep-2014 14:23
Send private message

I am not in favour of this scheme (oh dear, I do sound like an old codger).

We don't need it in Wellington, we just don't have the population to support long haul flights.

Christchurch barely has enough people to support long haul flights.

The other problem is just where on the airport do they plan to park these planes?  I doubt there is room for more than one 777 at a time at the airport.

If Infratil want to do it then they should put their money at risk and stop asking others to pay.  If they believe it is such a great idea then how about a proposal where Infratil put the cash up to do the job and they have a deal with the local govt bodies in the region that see them paying money to Infratil when they hit certain performance targets.

4123 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1129184 15-Sep-2014 16:12
Send private message

BTR: Seems a stupid idea to me, its always fogged in


Ah no, on average, Wellington had 4.2 a year closures due to fog, compared to Auckland getting 14.5 and Christchurch's 52.3.

14694 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1129208 15-Sep-2014 16:36
Send private message

afe66: Yes move capital to Auckland.... watch the house prices.

Will be funny for those of us who don't live there.
.
Or you could move it to Christchurch as they already have an international airport

A.



Shame it does not have your predicted effect on house prices around here!

Ours is precisely identical right now to what it was in 2007 - has not, according to some interactive graphic in the Herald at least, gone up so much as a dollar!





1216 posts

Uber Geek


  #1132437 19-Sep-2014 23:12
Send private message

wongtop: Any aviation geeks want to chime in here.  According to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wellington_International_Airport the existing runway is too short for even the B737 or the A320 to take off at MTOW.  In order for long haul flights to be viable I would have thought that they would need to be operating around MTOW to allow for enough passangers and cargo for good load factors.  I don't see how a mere 300 metre extension would allow this.  My understanding is that the take off lengths for B787 and A350 at MTOW are up near 3000 metres, while the extended runway will still only be ~2400 m.  Or am I mistaken?


Yeah, you are generally correct, backed up by the airport companies own website (http://www.wellingtonairport.co.nz/news/wellington-airport-welcomes-ana-777-charter-flight-direct-from-japan/) 

WN is a comparatively short runway. Taking off is the tricky bit, and 300 meters can make a difference to the max take off weight (in the case of a B767, 300 meters allows for approx 5 tonnes more fuel/freight (http://www.boeing.com/assets/pdf/commercial/airports/acaps/767sec3.pdf) . Extra length also allows for aircraft to use less throttle which makes less noise pollution and conserves turbine engine life. (http://www.theairlinepilots.com/forumarchive/quickref/reducedandderatedthrust.pdf )

Unused runway in front of you is like money in the (safety) bank. There have been several aircraft in the last decade choose to make emergency landings in Ohakea (Airforce base near Palmerston Nth) not WG, not solely, but in part, because the runway is longer at 2445 meters and doesn't end in the ocean. Additionally there are 3 intersecting runways to choose from, so there is generally always a runway available that suits the wind direction of the day, further simplifying landing and avoiding those spectacular, crabbing, cross wind landings Wellington is famous for (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ba_OBVafiq0).

Auckland Airport company is fishing for subsidies in the same way. They want the tax/rate payer to build a motorway and train to their airport and in the next breath insist there is no value in using Whenuapia as a commercial airport, despite it being much closer to the CBD, and being only 400 meters across farmland from one of Auckland major interconnecting motorways.

4418 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #1132459 20-Sep-2014 01:09
Send private message

Geektastic:

Build a new airport in Masterton and a new 300kmh train between there and the city centre.



... or redevelop Paraparaumu, Wellington's airport up till 1960's. Already a train line nearby and Transmission Gully coming soon.




Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.


1766 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #1132484 20-Sep-2014 06:41
Send private message

And a population of 49,000 surrounding it on every approach angle...

16203 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1132494 20-Sep-2014 07:48
Send private message

Building elsewhere may be more cost effective in the long term. Kapiti's a bit far away, but there's plenty of land in the Porirua area, and it's not far from Wellington. That way more people would get there mostly on motorways too - people from the hutt, kapiti, and once people leave Wellington too. The current airport's way south and has little feeder roads that get clogged easily.

BTR: Seems a stupid idea to me, its always fogged in and when its not its windy as hell. Welcome to New Zealand where you will be blown away.... Literally. 

Why not spend the money on fixing the trains or building a fence around parliament to house the Zoo animals.


Statistically Auckland airport is disrupted due to fog more than Wellington.



3209 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1132555 20-Sep-2014 09:27
Send private message

tripper1000: 

Auckland Airport company is fishing for subsidies in the same way. They want the tax/rate payer to build a motorway and train to their airport and in the next breath insist there is no value in using Whenuapia as a commercial airport, despite it being much closer to the CBD, and being only 400 meters across farmland from one of Auckland major interconnecting motorways.


Auckland Airport already receives ratepayer money by virtue of being part owned by the council.  And personally, I'd rather the taxpayer/ratepayer pick up the tab for building transport links to the airport, to avoid situations like Brisbane where it's $16 by train to the airport or $5-$10 in tolls.  Oh suuuuuuure there's a free way to it as well, but it's sooooo much less convenient.  Ya know?

1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




News »

Freeview On Demand app launches on Sony Android TVs
Posted 6-Aug-2020 13:35


UFB hits more than one million connections
Posted 6-Aug-2020 09:42


D-Link A/NZ extends COVR Wi-Fi EasyMesh System series with new three-pack
Posted 4-Aug-2020 15:01


New Zealand software Rfider tracks coffee from Colombia all the way to New Zealand businesses
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:35


Logitech G launches Pro X Wireless gaming headset
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:21


Sony Alpha 7S III provides supreme imaging performance
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:11


Sony introduces first CFexpress Type A memory card
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:05


Marsello acquires Goody consolidating online and in-store marketing position
Posted 30-Jul-2020 16:26


Fonterra first major customer for Microsoft's New Zealand datacentre
Posted 30-Jul-2020 08:07


Everything we learnt at the IBM Cloud Forum 2020
Posted 29-Jul-2020 14:45


Dropbox launches native HelloSign workflow and data residency in Australia
Posted 29-Jul-2020 12:48


Spark launches 5G in Palmerston North
Posted 29-Jul-2020 09:50


Lenovo brings speed and smarter features to new 5G mobile gaming phone
Posted 28-Jul-2020 22:00


Withings raises $60 million to enable bridge between patients and healthcare
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:51


QNAP integrates Catalyst Cloud Object Storage into Hybrid Backup solution
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:40



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.