Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1962183 22-Feb-2018 12:24
Send private message

cadman:

 

I'm not sure why you're worried. If they're not attending, don't bother either, unless you want to try and claim your excess back from the other party (although presumably there was some fault apportioned to you because otherwise there would be no excess deducted since clearly the other party was identified).

 

There are no lawyers at the Disputes Tribunal either.

 

 

Oooh, that could be some extremely bad advice.

 

The insurance policy almost certainly has a clause stating you have to assist your insurer and if you don't you risk having your cover voided. I wouldn't put it past Youi aiming for this outcome.

 

So whatever you do, turn up. Failure to do so could be very expensive.


1014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 572
Inactive user


  Reply # 1962204 22-Feb-2018 13:10
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

cadman:

 

I'm not sure why you're worried. If they're not attending, don't bother either, unless you want to try and claim your excess back from the other party (although presumably there was some fault apportioned to you because otherwise there would be no excess deducted since clearly the other party was identified).

 

There are no lawyers at the Disputes Tribunal either.

 

 

Oooh, that could be some extremely bad advice.

 

The insurance policy almost certainly has a clause stating you have to assist your insurer and if you don't you risk having your cover voided. I wouldn't put it past Youi aiming for this outcome.

 

So whatever you do, turn up. Failure to do so could be very expensive.

 

 

You're probably right. Given this company's dodgy tactics to void claims in the past it may be just the 'out' they're looking for. However, I would contend that the notion of "assist us" requires the other party to be participating or at least attending at the same time.

 

From their policy wording (updated this month)

 

 

Edited: "Their" changed to "they're". Hoisted by my own petard! Oh well - at least I actually know the difference and can spot it.


 
 
 
 


2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1962213 22-Feb-2018 13:15
Send private message

Yeah strange that they wouldn't assist themselves, isn't it? Definitely fishy.




125 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 32

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1962327 22-Feb-2018 16:29
Send private message

Thanks for everyone's responses...

 

On Monday I'll have time to chase up the insurer with full force, even if it takes all day. Hopefully then, one way or another, I'll find out what's going on in their heads. After that it'll be just over a week until the tribunal itself.

 

I'll keep this thread updated!


1014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 572
Inactive user


  Reply # 1962361 22-Feb-2018 17:30
Send private message

I forgot to ask. Do you prefer Mr tuh-mey-toh or Mr tuh-mah-toh? I'd hate to offend...




125 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 32

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1962390 22-Feb-2018 18:24
Send private message

cadman:

 

I forgot to ask. Do you prefer Mr tuh-mey-toh or Mr tuh-mah-toh? I'd hate to offend...

 

 

Mister Toh-mah-tow, of course, like a proper person.


1315 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1020

Subscriber

  Reply # 1963160 23-Feb-2018 19:31
One person supports this post
Send private message

cadman:

 

You're probably right. Given this company's dodgy tactics to void claims in the past it may be just the 'out' they're looking for. However, I would contend that the notion of "assist us" requires the other party to be participating or at least attending at the same time.

 

From their policy wording (updated this month)

 

 

Edited: "Their" changed to "they're". Hoisted by my own petard! Oh well - at least I actually know the difference and can spot it.

 

 

I can guarantee you that your interpretation is 100% wrong. Legal proceedings can occur even if one party isn't participating.

 

 

 

 


1014 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 572
Inactive user


  Reply # 1963171 23-Feb-2018 19:44
Send private message

dejadeadnz:

 

cadman:

 

You're probably right. Given this company's dodgy tactics to void claims in the past it may be just the 'out' they're looking for. However, I would contend that the notion of "assist us" requires the other party to be participating or at least attending at the same time.

 

From their policy wording (updated this month)

 

 

Edited: "Their" changed to "they're". Hoisted by my own petard! Oh well - at least I actually know the difference and can spot it.

 

 

I can guarantee you that your interpretation is 100% wrong. Legal proceedings can occur even if one party isn't participating.

 

 

Fair enough - you're the law-talking guy.

 

However, I consider not to be assisting someone if they simply leave it to me.


18748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5376

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1963234 23-Feb-2018 23:56
Send private message

I am wondering how badly this could end. If you turn up and lose, would youi then try and blame you and say you didn't "help" them and then refuse your cover? 

 

I'd probably make a call to the consumer people if you are a member. Also potentially a call to the insurance ombudsmen office and see if you can see if you can get their perspective on it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 




125 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 32

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1965163 27-Feb-2018 15:17
Send private message

For those who are keeping up with this thread, I finally got to have a proper conversation with the insurance company today.

 

The good news: I won't be on my own - they've got a representative they're sending along, so that's slightly better than expected.

 

The bad news: I've finally found out what the third party's argument is, and it's an outright lie. Given the lack of evidence on either side (witnesses drove off, no CCTV), it's going to be a he-said-she-said situation at the hearing.

 

I'm going to start researching front and rear dashcams tonight! I never want to find myself in this situation again.

 

Edit: Hearing is next week.


2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1965188 27-Feb-2018 15:44
Send private message

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

So the other guy already looks a bit suspect for not having insurance. If you have other factors such as they hit the left side of your car etc it could well go your way.

 

But the worst outcome is you wear the excess - not the end of the world (or that was the case with me - as AMI seemingly don't drop your NCB unless you have multiple claims).

 

I agree we all should think about dashcams.

 

 




125 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 32

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1965204 27-Feb-2018 15:50
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

 

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my update. The other party is insured, albeit by a company I've never heard of.


2523 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 970

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1965206 27-Feb-2018 15:53
Send private message

MrTomato:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

 

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my update. The other party is insured, albeit by a company I've never heard of.

 

 

Very strange then that this has gone to DT... unless things have changed in the industry. But then again, it's Youi and some never heard of company, so maybe they don't play like the big boys.

 

Is it possible they just said to you that they are insured, but lied?

 

 


18748 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5376

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1965209 27-Feb-2018 15:55
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

MrTomato:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

 

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my update. The other party is insured, albeit by a company I've never heard of.

 

 

Very strange then that this has gone to DT... unless things have changed in the industry. But then again, it's Youi and some never heard of company, so maybe they don't play like the big boys.

 

Is it possible they just said to you that they are insured, but lied?

 

 

 

 

Yeah, something is going on. All insurers are bound by the same rules I thought and the knock for knock still applies as recently as November as I heard it talked about in another context. 

 

 


787 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 476


  Reply # 1965211 27-Feb-2018 15:56
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured.

 

I was wondering why anyone insured would bother lying, but that would explain it.

 

My brother and ex G.F. have been in the exact same boat. Weirdly both times the other driver lost their ability to speak English between the crash and Small Claims and a husband/father had to speak on their behalves. Dash-cam's would definitely have helped in both cases.


1 | 2 | 3
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.