Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1962183 22-Feb-2018 12:24
Send private message

cadman:

 

I'm not sure why you're worried. If they're not attending, don't bother either, unless you want to try and claim your excess back from the other party (although presumably there was some fault apportioned to you because otherwise there would be no excess deducted since clearly the other party was identified).

 

There are no lawyers at the Disputes Tribunal either.

 

 

Oooh, that could be some extremely bad advice.

 

The insurance policy almost certainly has a clause stating you have to assist your insurer and if you don't you risk having your cover voided. I wouldn't put it past Youi aiming for this outcome.

 

So whatever you do, turn up. Failure to do so could be very expensive.


cadman
1014 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1962204 22-Feb-2018 13:10
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

cadman:

 

I'm not sure why you're worried. If they're not attending, don't bother either, unless you want to try and claim your excess back from the other party (although presumably there was some fault apportioned to you because otherwise there would be no excess deducted since clearly the other party was identified).

 

There are no lawyers at the Disputes Tribunal either.

 

 

Oooh, that could be some extremely bad advice.

 

The insurance policy almost certainly has a clause stating you have to assist your insurer and if you don't you risk having your cover voided. I wouldn't put it past Youi aiming for this outcome.

 

So whatever you do, turn up. Failure to do so could be very expensive.

 

 

You're probably right. Given this company's dodgy tactics to void claims in the past it may be just the 'out' they're looking for. However, I would contend that the notion of "assist us" requires the other party to be participating or at least attending at the same time.

 

From their policy wording (updated this month)

 

 

Edited: "Their" changed to "they're". Hoisted by my own petard! Oh well - at least I actually know the difference and can spot it.


 
 
 
 


kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1962213 22-Feb-2018 13:15
Send private message

Yeah strange that they wouldn't assist themselves, isn't it? Definitely fishy.


MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1962327 22-Feb-2018 16:29
Send private message

Thanks for everyone's responses...

 

On Monday I'll have time to chase up the insurer with full force, even if it takes all day. Hopefully then, one way or another, I'll find out what's going on in their heads. After that it'll be just over a week until the tribunal itself.

 

I'll keep this thread updated!


cadman
1014 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1962361 22-Feb-2018 17:30
Send private message

I forgot to ask. Do you prefer Mr tuh-mey-toh or Mr tuh-mah-toh? I'd hate to offend...


MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1962390 22-Feb-2018 18:24
Send private message

cadman:

 

I forgot to ask. Do you prefer Mr tuh-mey-toh or Mr tuh-mah-toh? I'd hate to offend...

 

 

Mister Toh-mah-tow, of course, like a proper person.


dejadeadnz
2398 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1963160 23-Feb-2018 19:31
Send private message

cadman:

 

You're probably right. Given this company's dodgy tactics to void claims in the past it may be just the 'out' they're looking for. However, I would contend that the notion of "assist us" requires the other party to be participating or at least attending at the same time.

 

From their policy wording (updated this month)

 

 

Edited: "Their" changed to "they're". Hoisted by my own petard! Oh well - at least I actually know the difference and can spot it.

 

 

I can guarantee you that your interpretation is 100% wrong. Legal proceedings can occur even if one party isn't participating.

 

 

 

 


 
 
 
 


cadman
1014 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1963171 23-Feb-2018 19:44
Send private message

dejadeadnz:

 

cadman:

 

You're probably right. Given this company's dodgy tactics to void claims in the past it may be just the 'out' they're looking for. However, I would contend that the notion of "assist us" requires the other party to be participating or at least attending at the same time.

 

From their policy wording (updated this month)

 

 

Edited: "Their" changed to "they're". Hoisted by my own petard! Oh well - at least I actually know the difference and can spot it.

 

 

I can guarantee you that your interpretation is 100% wrong. Legal proceedings can occur even if one party isn't participating.

 

 

Fair enough - you're the law-talking guy.

 

However, I consider not to be assisting someone if they simply leave it to me.


networkn
23450 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1963234 23-Feb-2018 23:56
Send private message

I am wondering how badly this could end. If you turn up and lose, would youi then try and blame you and say you didn't "help" them and then refuse your cover? 

 

I'd probably make a call to the consumer people if you are a member. Also potentially a call to the insurance ombudsmen office and see if you can see if you can get their perspective on it. 

 

 

 

 

 

 


MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1965163 27-Feb-2018 15:17
Send private message

For those who are keeping up with this thread, I finally got to have a proper conversation with the insurance company today.

 

The good news: I won't be on my own - they've got a representative they're sending along, so that's slightly better than expected.

 

The bad news: I've finally found out what the third party's argument is, and it's an outright lie. Given the lack of evidence on either side (witnesses drove off, no CCTV), it's going to be a he-said-she-said situation at the hearing.

 

I'm going to start researching front and rear dashcams tonight! I never want to find myself in this situation again.

 

Edit: Hearing is next week.


kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1965188 27-Feb-2018 15:44
Send private message

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

So the other guy already looks a bit suspect for not having insurance. If you have other factors such as they hit the left side of your car etc it could well go your way.

 

But the worst outcome is you wear the excess - not the end of the world (or that was the case with me - as AMI seemingly don't drop your NCB unless you have multiple claims).

 

I agree we all should think about dashcams.

 

 


MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1965204 27-Feb-2018 15:50
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

 

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my update. The other party is insured, albeit by a company I've never heard of.


kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1965206 27-Feb-2018 15:53
Send private message

MrTomato:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

 

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my update. The other party is insured, albeit by a company I've never heard of.

 

 

Very strange then that this has gone to DT... unless things have changed in the industry. But then again, it's Youi and some never heard of company, so maybe they don't play like the big boys.

 

Is it possible they just said to you that they are insured, but lied?

 

 


networkn
23450 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1965209 27-Feb-2018 15:55
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

MrTomato:

 

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured. If they were insured the two insurance companies would each wear their own customer's bill under the 'knock for knock' agreement among all the insurers.

 

 

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my update. The other party is insured, albeit by a company I've never heard of.

 

 

Very strange then that this has gone to DT... unless things have changed in the industry. But then again, it's Youi and some never heard of company, so maybe they don't play like the big boys.

 

Is it possible they just said to you that they are insured, but lied?

 

 

 

 

Yeah, something is going on. All insurers are bound by the same rules I thought and the knock for knock still applies as recently as November as I heard it talked about in another context. 

 

 


tripper1000
1248 posts

Uber Geek


  #1965211 27-Feb-2018 15:56
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

It will only go to DT if the other party is uninsured.

 

I was wondering why anyone insured would bother lying, but that would explain it.

 

My brother and ex G.F. have been in the exact same boat. Weirdly both times the other driver lost their ability to speak English between the crash and Small Claims and a husband/father had to speak on their behalves. Dash-cam's would definitely have helped in both cases.


1 | 2 | 3
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS16211+
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13


Teletrac Navman launches integrated multi-camera solution for transport and logistics industry
Posted 8-Oct-2020 10:57


Farmside hits 10,000 RBI customers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 15:32


NordVPN starts deploying colocated servers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 09:00


Google introduces Nest Wifi routers in New Zealand
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Orcon to bundle Google Nest Wifi router with new accounts
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Epay and Centrapay partner to create digital gift cards
Posted 2-Oct-2020 17:34


Inseego launches 5G MiFi M2000 mobile hotspot
Posted 2-Oct-2020 14:53









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.