Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1965212 27-Feb-2018 15:57
Send private message

kryptonjohn:

 

Is it possible they just said to you that they are insured, but lied?

 

 

It's possible, but they've been lying to Youi in that case - I never personally found out who the insurer was. I've looked for their insurer on the web, and they do exist. (Sorry, I'd like to give more details, but I prefer to stay anonymous on forums, and I'm wary of saying anything that might positively identify me.)


wellygary
5012 posts

Uber Geek


  #1965213 27-Feb-2018 15:58
Send private message

MrTomato:

 

Sorry, I should have mentioned in my update. The other party is insured, albeit by a company I've never heard of.

 

 

I'm presuming its legit...

 

https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/regulation-and-supervision/insurers/licensing/register

 

and a member of the Insurance council

 

https://www.icnz.org.nz/about-us/our-members/

 

So I guess what is being disputed is fault, because the other party has a significant excess??


 
 
 
 


MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1965251 27-Feb-2018 17:03
Send private message

tripper1000:

 

I was wondering why anyone insured would bother lying, but that would explain it.

 

 

They were driving a work vehicle (truck), and according to the details I received from Youi today it appears that the boss has been dealing with the claim on their end.

 

wellygary:

 

I'm presuming its legit...

 

https://www.rbnz.govt.nz/regulation-and-supervision/insurers/licensing/register

 

and a member of the Insurance council

 

https://www.icnz.org.nz/about-us/our-members/

 

So I guess what is being disputed is fault, because the other party has a significant excess??

 

 

Hmm... It turns out that the third party's insurer isn't listed as being licensed, but they describe themselves as being underwritten by a company that is.


allan
1314 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #1965256 27-Feb-2018 17:16
Send private message

Just to clarify the previous question regarding lawyers at Disputes tribunal hearings - https://www.disputestribunal.govt.nz/about-2/ says:

 

The Disputes Tribunal isn't like a formal court. A lawyer can’t represent you in the hearing and there are no judges. Each hearing is run by a referee, who will encourage both sides to reach agreement. If they can’t, the referee makes a decision. This decision is binding (you have to follow it).

 

My one and only appearance at a Disputes Tribunal hearing was with my then 16 year old son and a representative from AMI. My son had rear-ended a taxi and in addition to dealing with his own insurer for damage to his vehicle, the taxi driver had submitted a loss of use claim to AMI for the period his taxi was off the road - and for which there is apparently an agreed formula that insurance companies use. He had been paid out on this basis by AMI, but continued to hassle both my son and myself for more money. When we wouldn't budge, he lodged a Disputes Tribunal application. On the day he took some 40 mins to present his case, kept interrupting the referee when she tried to get him back on track and also tried to claim for the filing fee, which is expressly prohibited.

 

Obviously we couldn't reach agreement with him, but the guy from AMI was great, had researched their records and discovered that they had paid him out previously for loss of use on exactly the same basis and which he had accepted. The referee disappeared for some 10 minutes and came back with a ruling that his case had failed. 

 

Overall the environment was not at all intimidating and I thought the referee did an excellent job in trying to keep things moving along.


networkn
23496 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1965497 28-Feb-2018 09:02
Send private message

It's actually moderately more difficult to lie in the presence of authority.

 

The key is to stay calm, even if they outrightly lie. 

 

 


networkn
23496 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1965498 28-Feb-2018 09:03
Send private message

Our experience with the DT was similar to Allans. The "judge" was there to keep things calm, consider the facts and present a binding decision. 

 

Our guy didn't turn up to defend himself, but we had photos, videos, text messages and there was really no possible chance for him to win anyway. We won he declared bankruptcy. 

 

Wasn't traffic related. 


MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1970786 7-Mar-2018 17:39
Send private message

For anyone playing along at home, the hearing was today and went quite well, mainly because the third party couldn't keep their nonsense straight when it came to the crunch. That being said, I don't have a result because the referee said that they wanted to check something specific in the law. I would expect to hear the result soon, but judging by Youi's previous behaviour, I'll probably have to chase it up.

 

On the subject of Youi, they had failed to fill in the Disputes Tribunal claim paperwork properly (!), so the representative they sent along and I got a proper dressing-down from the referee, and understandably so. I'm happy to say that their local representative, however, was excellent.


 
 
 
 


kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1970802 7-Mar-2018 19:32
Send private message

Good to hear it went well.

MrTomato

134 posts

Master Geek

Lifetime subscriber

#1976673 14-Mar-2018 18:47
Send private message

Final update from me: Got the result today and I won, unequivocally.

 

I'm glad it's over and done with! Hopefully I'll have my excess refunded without too much fuss now.

 

In the final analysis the service from Youi was a mixed bag. The way they handled the claim at the beginning was responsible and efficient, and the representative they sent along to the Disputes Tribunal hearing was excellent. On the other hand they let themselves down badly with their lack of communication and professionalism for the whole middle section of the claim - they fell out of touch, filed the Disputes Tribunal claim in my name without telling me, failed to respond to queries, and even managed to file the Disputes Tribunal claim paperwork incorrectly, causing the ire of the referee in the hearing and a strong warning that the next poor sap they do that to may have their case dismissed out of hand. So make of all that what you will. I appreciate the things they got right, but won't be remaining a customer.

 

Sincere thanks to everyone who responded in this thread - it was all useful, and I very much appreciate it.


kryptonjohn
2523 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1976930 15-Mar-2018 08:00
Send private message

Excellent result and nice to know the DT is working as it was intended. I wonder if it is unique to NZ?

 

 


neb

neb
3057 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1982872 25-Mar-2018 15:05
Send private message

networkn:

Our experience with the DT was similar to Allans. The "judge" was there to keep things calm, consider the facts and present a binding decision. 

 

 

One problem with the DT is that it's entirely, and totally, in the hands of the referee. They can allow either side to say whatever they want, for as long as they want, without being challenged in any way. I've had both really good outcomes and appallingly bad outcomes based on the referee. So it's fine for small amounts, or where it's an open-and-closed case, but if you're dealing with a serious scammer and significant amounts of money are involved you probably want to go to a full trial where your lawyer can cross-examine them.

1 | 2 | 3 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Vodafone enables 5G roaming - for when international travel comes
Posted 30-Oct-2020 15:03


Spark awards funding to Kiwi businesses in 5G funding initiative
Posted 30-Oct-2020 14:58


Huawei launches IdeaHub Pro in New Zealand
Posted 27-Oct-2020 16:41


Southland-based IT specialist providing virtual services worldwide
Posted 27-Oct-2020 15:55


NASA discovers water on sunlit surface of Moon
Posted 27-Oct-2020 08:30


Huawei introduces new features to Petal Search, Maps and Docs
Posted 26-Oct-2020 18:05


Nokia selected by NASA to build first ever cellular network on the Moon
Posted 21-Oct-2020 08:34


Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS16211+
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.