Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
2313 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 907

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001325 23-Apr-2018 22:44
Send private message quote this post

Just got back from a week in Hawaii flying NZ10/NZ9..
Flight up on 787 had a 1.5h delay for engineering inspection.
Flight back on 777 all on time but on arrival had used sporting gear to declare and the yellow lane took an hour to get through arrrgh!
But good news, got a one-up upgrade for all 5 of us to premium economy for the minimum possible bid of 200 airpoints per seat ba-zing!

816 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 236


  Reply # 2001369 24-Apr-2018 08:19
Send private message quote this post

Just flew AKL->Singapore and back again.

 

 

 

Outbound was direct flight, normal, on time etc. On the way back they were offering a hotel and $500 to get bumped in an effort to reduce passenger and luggage weight and thus engine thrust needed to take off but to no avail - we ended up having to detour to Sydney to take on fuel as they were forced to reduce weight here instead.

 

 

 

Overall (we took off late) about 2 hours added to the journey.





.

2313 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 907

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001396 24-Apr-2018 09:33
Send private message quote this post

Item:

 

Just flew AKL->Singapore and back again.

 

 

 

Outbound was direct flight, normal, on time etc. On the way back they were offering a hotel and $500 to get bumped in an effort to reduce passenger and luggage weight and thus engine thrust needed to take off but to no avail - we ended up having to detour to Sydney to take on fuel as they were forced to reduce weight here instead.

 

 

 

Overall (we took off late) about 2 hours added to the journey.

 

 

2 hrs is a bugger ... hopefully better than just bumping some random poor buggers off like United et al do?

 

 


69 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 2001408 24-Apr-2018 09:38
Send private message quote this post

I tried to fly to NYC via Houston on Sunday NZ28. Flight was delayed twice, then I changed to go via San Francisco NZ8. Saw the Houston flight was delayed 1 more time after that.


903 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 218


  Reply # 2001429 24-Apr-2018 10:28
quote this post

kryptonjohn:

 

Item:

 

Just flew AKL->Singapore and back again.

 

 

 

Outbound was direct flight, normal, on time etc. On the way back they were offering a hotel and $500 to get bumped in an effort to reduce passenger and luggage weight and thus engine thrust needed to take off but to no avail - we ended up having to detour to Sydney to take on fuel as they were forced to reduce weight here instead.

 

 

 

Overall (we took off late) about 2 hours added to the journey.

 

 

2 hrs is a bugger ... hopefully better than just bumping some random poor buggers off like United et al do?

 

 

 

 

Is this reduced thrust thing part of the FAA directive? Not exactly confidence inspiring...

 

Another option to reduce thrust on those engines would be to fit an extra take-off engine in the tail similar to the HS Trident 3. The Brits. managed to cripple this aircraft by giving it low powered engines & enough range to get to Paris and other fairly close Euro destinations. The Trident had the nickname of ground grubber because of its long takeoff roll however it had a very high cruise speed, quite a bit faster than say an A320.

 

http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=381739          (Optional fourth engine for takeoff)


2313 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 907

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001432 24-Apr-2018 10:35
Send private message quote this post

Sounds like RR have new compressor and turbine blades that doesn't suffer the fatigue issue. So no replacement engines required - just replacement fan blades. But they can't get them manufactured fast enough.

 

RR facing US$315 million expense over this debacle - hardly crippling for them. This issue is also affecting A380s with Trent 900 engines:

 

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/rolls-royce-takes-hit-on-787-and-a380-blade-flaws-446528/

 

"The manufacturer expects its solutions to the Trent 1000 problems, including redesigned parts, to be "fully embodied" in the fleet by 2022." - yikes.


3356 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 568

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001455 24-Apr-2018 10:57
Send private message quote this post

amiga500:

kryptonjohn:


Item:


Just flew AKL->Singapore and back again.


 


Outbound was direct flight, normal, on time etc. On the way back they were offering a hotel and $500 to get bumped in an effort to reduce passenger and luggage weight and thus engine thrust needed to take off but to no avail - we ended up having to detour to Sydney to take on fuel as they were forced to reduce weight here instead.


 


Overall (we took off late) about 2 hours added to the journey.



2 hrs is a bugger ... hopefully better than just bumping some random poor buggers off like United et al do?


 



Is this reduced thrust thing part of the FAA directive? Not exactly confidence inspiring...


Another option to reduce thrust on those engines would be to fit an extra take-off engine in the tail similar to the HS Trident 3. The Brits. managed to cripple this aircraft by giving it low powered engines & enough range to get to Paris and other fairly close Euro destinations. The Trident had the nickname of ground grubber because of its long takeoff roll however it had a very high cruise speed, quite a bit faster than say an A320.


http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=381739          (Optional fourth engine for takeoff)



This is tongue in cheek right? As discussed earlier in the thread, even the option of changing out the engine type to one already certified is prohibitive. Adding an extra engine, wow!

My understanding is the fatigue issue in the compressor is caused by harmonics at particular combinations of speed and inlet conditions. Something that is very difficult to calculate during design, but probably should have been found during testing. The reduced loads (takeoff weight) will be to avoid the necessity to run one or both the engines in that harmonic inducing range for extended periods.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

903 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 218


  Reply # 2001460 24-Apr-2018 11:04
quote this post

Yep! Very tongue in cheek like Winston suggesting a free trade agreement for North Korea!smile


2313 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 907

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001461 24-Apr-2018 11:06
Send private message quote this post

Oh, Winston was tongue in cheek? I thought he'd spend a bit too long in the Green Parrot and meant to say South Korea!

 

After all, who would want a trade agreement with a country that has no hard currency (other than that derived from illegal arms and slave trading)?

 

Whoops, sorry, went OT.




17563 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5055

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001488 24-Apr-2018 11:23
Send private message quote this post

Might have been asked and answered, but why isn't rolls royce just sending out new engines out that don't have the defect? 


26772 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6249

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001527 24-Apr-2018 12:00
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

Might have been asked and answered, but why isn't rolls royce just sending out new engines out that don't have the defect? 

 

 

Because they don't have any.

 

Some engines destined for new aircraft (AOG) were being pulled from the supply chain, but that doesn't result in an immediate fix. That also causes grief for Boeing who then can't build planes.

 

While I haven't seen an actual figure it's safe to assume RR are capable of building 1-2 engines per day and there are a few hundred affected engines.

 

 


2313 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 907

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001564 24-Apr-2018 12:44
Send private message quote this post

Yeah and according to Wiki they're worth about US$42 mil each so you wouldn't want to be sitting on a large inventory of them or handing them over without a fight.


903 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 218


  Reply # 2001639 24-Apr-2018 13:51
quote this post

It seems that Air NZ were able to get quite a few of the Trent 1000 'Ten' type engines so they could have a Type 'C' and a type 'Ten' engine on each plane. So it might mean that Air NZ were more pro-active than some other airlines in managing the risk.


2313 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 907

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2001649 24-Apr-2018 13:59
Send private message quote this post

amiga500:

 

It seems that Air NZ were able to get quite a few of the Trent 1000 'Ten' type engines so they could have a Type 'C' and a type 'Ten' engine on each plane. So it might mean that Air NZ were more pro-active than some other airlines in managing the risk.

 

 

I can't see how that helps... as if the Ten fails the TypeC still has the distance/time/power restriction?

 

 


903 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 218


  Reply # 2001653 24-Apr-2018 14:09
quote this post

kryptonjohn:

 

amiga500:

 

It seems that Air NZ were able to get quite a few of the Trent 1000 'Ten' type engines so they could have a Type 'C' and a type 'Ten' engine on each plane. So it might mean that Air NZ were more pro-active than some other airlines in managing the risk.

 

 

I can't see how that helps... as if the Ten fails the TypeC still has the distance/time/power restriction?

 

 

 

 

I think it is  better than having two of the Type C engines if those engines have the same number of cycles. However, you are right seeing how the FAA have put a 140 minutes' ETOPS on the aircraft. I read on another forum that the FAA have a lot of concern about the engines whether Type 'C' or Type '10'.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Intel introduces new NUC kits and NUC mini PCs
Posted 16-Aug-2018 11:03


The Warehouse leaps into the AI future with Google
Posted 15-Aug-2018 17:56


Targus set sights on enterprise and consumer growth in New Zealand
Posted 13-Aug-2018 13:47


Huawei to distribute nova 3i in New Zealand
Posted 9-Aug-2018 16:23


Home robot Vector to be available in New Zealand stores
Posted 9-Aug-2018 14:47


Panasonic announces new 2018 OLED TV line up
Posted 7-Aug-2018 16:38


Kordia completes first live 4K TV broadcast
Posted 1-Aug-2018 13:00


Schools get safer and smarter internet with Managed Network Upgrade
Posted 30-Jul-2018 20:01


DNC wants a safer .nz in the coming year
Posted 26-Jul-2018 16:08


Auldhouse becomes an AWS Authorised Training Delivery Partner in New Zealand
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:55


Rakuten Kobo launches Kobo Clara HD entry level reader
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:44


Kiwi team reaches semi-finals at the Microsoft Imagine Cup
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:38


KidsCan App to Help Kiwi Children in Need
Posted 26-Jul-2018 15:32


FUJIFILM announces new high-performance lenses
Posted 24-Jul-2018 14:57


New FUJIFILM XF10 introduces square mode for Instagram sharing
Posted 24-Jul-2018 14:44



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.