Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




19552 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5876

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

Topic # 245655 14-Feb-2019 21:20
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

https://www.stuff.co.nz/travel/news/110610300/embarrassing-blow-for-airbus-as-it-says-it-will-stop-making-the-a380-superjumbo

 

 

 

I am a little disappointed to see this didn't do better. Considering the R&D and time cost, and what it promised.

 

I liked the big lady, she was pretty smooth to fly on, unfortunately, my only experiences were with airlines who put the old old old IFE into them, with tiny non-touchscreens.

 

My preference is to fly the 787 though their technical issues give me the heebie jeebies as an anxious flyer.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
5623 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 253

Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178581 14-Feb-2019 21:20
Send private message quote this post

Allow me to introduce you folks to our new travel community: TravelTalk NZ.

 

We hope to see you there!

 





I am the Geekzone Robot and I am here to help. I am from the Internet. I do not interact. Do not expect other replies from me.



2003 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 854

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2178589 14-Feb-2019 21:58
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

It's not surprising but unfortunate. It was a great solution for a problem which didn't exist anymore.

 

It's still my favourite plane while in the air - it's so much quieter than anything else.

 

 


 
 
 
 




19552 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5876

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178590 14-Feb-2019 22:00
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Handle9:

 

It's not surprising but unfortunate. It was a great solution for a problem which didn't exist anymore.

 

It's still my favourite plane while in the air - it's so much quieter than anything else.

 

 

 

 

I didn't find it quieter than the 787, however I do like how big it is so turbulence seems less sharp. 

 

I would very much like to take an A350 at some stage, I hear they are amazing. I am not sure any route I am flying any time soon has them.

 

 


Webhead
2213 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 760

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178594 14-Feb-2019 22:14
Send private message quote this post

Really disappointed as well. Both at Airbus and Emirates.

 

My favourite way to get to Norway is through Dubai with the A380 on the longest leg between NZ or AUS and Dubai.

 

 





2003 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 854

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2178596 14-Feb-2019 22:19
Send private message quote this post

I don't think that the Auckland route will change from the A380, most of the time the loadings are pretty good.

 

The last few times I've flown from Europe to Dubai the loadings have been horrible (great for passengers). I've had a whole row to myself more often than not. They don't have this problem on 777 routes.

 

Emirates are expecting moderate growth in their Emirates products. They are expecting significant growth for FlyDubai which fly 737-800 and codeshare a bit with Emirates. In that context (point to point LCC) the A380 doesn't make sense.




19552 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5876

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178598 14-Feb-2019 22:23
Send private message quote this post

My favourite route and plane to date is the 777-300 via SIA to Singapore originating in Auckland. It's a wonderful craft. Quiet, comfortable, excellent IFE. I have flown in business and economy, and it's one of the only craft where if I fly Economy, I don't spend the entire time wishing I was in business.

 

The 777-200 is noticeably different. 

 

 


pdh

94 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 24


  Reply # 2178606 14-Feb-2019 23:26
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

Remember 20 years ago - when Airbus and Boeing gambled on two different futures ?

 

Airbus's crystal ball showed continued hub-to-hub growth - which would need lots of mega-craft to carry herds of cattle between the few big 'hub' airports. EG: feeder-flight from Auckland to Sydney, then a hub-to-hub flight Sydney to Dubai - then on to the final destination.

 

Collect people into a hub - then route traffic between hubs - then distribute out to the end-points.

 

Boeing's vision was for nimbler planes to go directly between the smaller cities - as we see in Auckland-Houston.

 

Two different ways to reduce the cost-per-mile - huge planes run with the same staff & fees, or lighter (but more technically difficult) aircraft with better range & fuel economy.

 

As a mechanical engineer with one brief (summer) job in the aircraft business, I was always rooting for Boeing - it was the 'harder' and more elegant solution, that needed geeky quantum leaps (eg: carbon-fibre) instead of the 'safer' route of 'just-make-it-bigger'.

 

Yes, Boeing's had more teething trouble (than they would have hoped) with the 787 - but it hasn't been as bad as the Comet was (a similar engineering leap).


Mad Scientist
19821 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2681

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178637 15-Feb-2019 07:33
Send private message quote this post

When I first heard of the A380, I thought to myself - that seriously requires A LOT of bums to keep the flights going. I guess not enough bums to fill the seats huh. I really thought the 747 capacity was the maximum you'd want on a route. Sometimes bigger isn't always better.

 

Now what does that mean for the 747-8 ... anyone flown that before?





Swype on iOS is detrimental to accurate typing. Apologies in advance.


3723 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 772

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178638 15-Feb-2019 07:36
Send private message quote this post

I look at the billions of dollars spent around the world's airports on infrastructure particularly for the A380. From double stacked airbridges to strengthened runways and widened taxiways. Every passenger passing through those airports pays for those 'improvements' whether they travel on an A380 or not. Auckland Airport had 5 A380s a day, now I think it has 2 (1EQ 1SQ).
The economics of large four engined aeroplanes are not stacking up for a lot of operators and there is a distinct possibility that soon Emirates will be the only operator of the A380.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

2003 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 854

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2178639 15-Feb-2019 07:39
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

The airport investment isn't particularly excessive. 777 actually require stronger runways than an A380 as they have a higher point load. Similarly the dual bridges can generally be used in a left and right configuration as well as up and down.

They aren't stopping flying A380s, they just aren't making any more.

3723 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 772

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178653 15-Feb-2019 08:26
Send private message quote this post

Handle9: The airport investment isn't particularly excessive. 777 actually require stronger runways than an A380 as they have a higher point load. Similarly the dual bridges can generally be used in a left and right configuration as well as up and down.

They aren't stopping flying A380s, they just aren't making any more.


I didn't say they weren't going to continue flying them. Boeing has finished production of the 747 passenger version (the last ones all Fs I think), delivering the last one to Korean in 2017. Now seeing the "Queen of the Skies" is becoming more and more rare.
The next big change for airliners will either be speed, or constraints forced by environmental concerns.




Areas of Geek interest: Home Theatre, HTPC, Android Tablets & Phones, iProducts.

6829 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2329

Trusted

  Reply # 2178654 15-Feb-2019 08:30
Send private message quote this post

Flew first class on a 380 and loved it, so roomy and was super super quiet on the top deck near the cockpit. Business was also really good and being that extra level higher than the engines and wing surfaces really makes for a noise reduction.
I went for a wander around the plane and loved the bar and had a few drinks, checked out a few things and talked a bit of crap with some flight staff.
Really is a good plane to fly on but I must admit it was overdue a refit as the times have changed drastically since their release.

I think AKL int make good money from the A380, I understand Emirates park their 3 380's on the tarmac every night or second night, fuel up to the brim and then fly to BNE, MEL, SYD. This must have some form of benefit for us. They did spend money extending for them but then again it is expansion that caters to all.





 


4250 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 825

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2178655 15-Feb-2019 08:36
Send private message quote this post

It brings back memories of the L-1011 Tristar - brilliant technologically but a total commercial failure.


2626 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1249

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2178658 15-Feb-2019 08:49
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

I don't like flying it the A380. Sure its comfortable, but it's just so big it scares me - the wing span is enormous. I feel happier in smaller single level planes. My dislike is irrational, I know, but it is what it is.

 

And, yes, the interiors feel very dated relative to the new twin engine wide bodied jets.


27574 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 7035

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2178664 15-Feb-2019 08:59
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Coil:

 

 I understand Emirates park their 3 380's on the tarmac every night or second night, fuel up to the brim and then fly to BNE, MEL, SYD. This must have some form of benefit for us. 

 

 

Emirates have't flown the A380 TT for several years now. There is a single A380 flight to DXB every day.

 

I'd also be highly surprised if they ever flew TT with anything but minimum fuel requirements. Filling them with fuel would be totally pointless.

 

 

 

 


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic


Donate via Givealittle


Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon introduces new Kindle with adjustable front light
Posted 21-Mar-2019 20:14


A call from the companies providing internet access for the great majority of New Zealanders, to the companies with the greatest influence over social media content
Posted 19-Mar-2019 15:21


Two e-scooter companies selected for Wellington trial
Posted 15-Mar-2019 17:33


GeForce GTX 1660 available now
Posted 15-Mar-2019 08:47


Artificial Intelligence to double the rate of innovation in New Zealand by 2021
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:47


LG demonstrates smart home concepts at LG InnoFest
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:45


New Zealanders buying more expensive smartphones
Posted 11-Mar-2019 09:52


2degrees Offers Amazon Prime Video to Broadband Customers
Posted 8-Mar-2019 14:10


D-Link ANZ launches D-Fend AC2600 Wi-Fi Router Protected by McAfee
Posted 7-Mar-2019 11:09


Slingshot commissions celebrities to design new modems
Posted 5-Mar-2019 08:58


Symantec Annual Threat Report reveals more ambitious, destructive and stealthy attacks
Posted 28-Feb-2019 10:14


FUJIFILM launches high performing X-T30
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:40


Netflix is killing content piracy says research
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:33


Trend Micro finds shifting threats require kiwis to rethink security priorities
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:27


Mainfreight uses Spark IoT Asset Tracking service
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:25



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.