Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31
Affiliate link
 
 
 

Affiliate link: Free kids accounts - trade shares and funds (NZ, US) with Sharesies.
networkn
27304 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2377760 18-Dec-2019 13:16
Send private message

afe66: Slightly off topic but my other half did BA Heathrow nervous flier course which is run by senior pilots with many many hours.

One person asked one of the pilots had they been nervous due to turbulence. I think he had 20k plus hours or something ridiculous flying wide body jets, and he said only once and that was for about 5 minutes. His comment was the planes are very over engineered.

 

Despite having done quite a few hundred flights in my life, I *hate* flying. Every sound, bump, movement. Even when I understand it's supposed to be happening, it's still me holding the seat with a death grip and sweating.

 

I have found ensuring a good nights sleep the night before makes a big difference, along with flying business where I can. Noise Cancelling Headphones helped quite a bit.

 

 


  #2380681 24-Dec-2019 08:04
Send private message

Boeing board sacks CEO

https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/boeing-ceo-resigns/

tehgerbil
932 posts

Ultimate Geek

ID Verified
Subscriber

  #2380742 24-Dec-2019 09:05
Send private message

I think was that the was inevitable conclusion. And now the Board can hire someone under the guise of 'improving culture', fire a whole bunch of desk jockeys and rinse and repeat.

 

 

 

The shareholder mantra of constant growth is such a toxic culture.




kingdragonfly
7005 posts

Uber Geek


  #2380747 24-Dec-2019 09:27
Send private message

Of course, Boeing did not respond to questions about how much Muilenburg will collect in severance pay.

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg has a severance package of $40M and an $800K annual pension according to company filings.

You could say the whole fiasco is a business successfully working with politicians to weaken the FAA. Ultimately it's the politicians' fault, with the lion-share of fault going to the Republicans.

I bet many car manufacturers would love to self-certify cars they were selling instead of submitting it to various independent agencies for crash-tests.

Technofreak
5414 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2380751 24-Dec-2019 09:42
Send private message

PolicyGuy: Boeing board sacks CEO

https://www.avweb.com/aviation-news/boeing-ceo-resigns/ 

 

 

 

Now starts the horse trading to get all the Alphabets (FAA, EASA, CAAC, CASA, CAA, Air Transport Canada etc) to sign off on the fix.

 

It's my guess the "fixes" have been designed, very thoroughly tested, and tested and tested and are ready for release into the wild. The rest of the process is now political.

 

Here's how I think this is possibly playing out behind the scenes.

 

Boeing have to be seen to be making organisational changes, Muilenburg's resignation is the start. Ultimately for Boeing, there needs to be quite a change at the top away from private equity money people, but that is another story.

 

The FAA have been accused of being too cosy with Boeing, they will make sure this process is seen to be squeaky clean and that their processes have changed. They will have to be seen to have had a significant input and oversight. Possibly to the extent of requiring changes and testing which may not be really necessary just to show they have been "doing their job".

 

Some of the other Alphabets will have a point to prove, they won't just accept the FAA sign off. They will want their own input. In the case of the Chinese it was reported that their very prompt suspension of Max flights was more to do with the Chinese/US trade war than concerns about the Max. This is another type of factor that also enters the mix.

 

How long the political game will carry on for is anyone's guess. Sadly it will not likely lead to any beneficial changes to the Max BUT will cost significant amounts of money.

 

There were hints many weeks ago that the Max could be in service again by year end 2019. That to me indicated the fixes had been made and tested awaiting approval. Now there are reports of the Max being removed from airline schedules out as far as mid 2020. Perhaps due to a protracted politicised approval process?





Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


Technofreak
5414 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2380755 24-Dec-2019 09:49
Send private message

kingdragonfly: Of course, Boeing did not respond to questions about how much Muilenburg will collect in severance pay.

Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg has a severance package of $40M and an $800K annual pension according to company filings.

You could say the whole fiasco is a business successfully working with politicians to weaken the FAA. Ultimately it's the politicians' fault, with the lion-share of fault going to the Republicans.

I bet many car manufacturers would love to self-certify cars they were selling instead of submitting it to various independent agencies for crash-tests.

 

 

 

Sorry, I don't follow your logic. I don't see how this is anything to do with politicians. The way aircraft manufacturers certify their aircraft in the US is the same as in Europe, Canada, Australia, New Zealand etc.

 

I not sure but I suspect car manufacturing isn't much different. There are design rules and the manufacturer has to show compliance with them. 





Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


FineWine
2348 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Nurse (R)
Lifetime subscriber

  #2380835 24-Dec-2019 10:50
Send private message

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50893490 "Boeing has said the MCAS software system, which relied on a single sensor, received erroneous data, which led it to override pilot commands and push the aircraft downwards."

 

I would have thought that a plane this modern and complex would of had double redundancy ?

 

 





iMac 27" [14.2] (late 2013), Airport Time Capsule 5th gen, iPhone13 x 2, iPad6, iPad Mini5, Spark Smart Modem 1st Gen

 

Panasonic TV Viera TH-L50E6Z (1080p), Panasonic Blu-ray PVR DMR-BWT835, Yamaha AVR RX-V1085 [6.1 Surround Speaker System], Apple TV 4k 64Gb (2nd gen)

 

Kia Sportage EX (2019), Mazda Demio (2001)

The difficult we can do immediately. The impossible takes a bit longer. But Miracles you will have to wait for.




Technofreak
5414 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2380862 24-Dec-2019 11:33
Send private message

FineWine:

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50893490 "Boeing has said the MCAS software system, which relied on a single sensor, received erroneous data, which led it to override pilot commands and push the aircraft downwards."

 

I would have thought that a plane this modern and complex would of had double redundancy ?

 

 

 

 

I don't know if you're meaning double redundancy (two separate systems each with their own redundancy) or just redundancy.

 

The redundancy issue has been been debated more than once. An extra sensor on it's own doesn't cut the mustard. When one fails, which one is assumed to be correct?

 

I won't go into great detail but there were other systems that provided validation of the single sensor input to the MCAS. These required pilot interpretation which was poorly executed (due to poor training, poor understanding of the correct procedures or other potential reasons) in the crash aircraft.





Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


alasta
5671 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #2380864 24-Dec-2019 11:34
Send private message

FineWine:

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50893490 "Boeing has said the MCAS software system, which relied on a single sensor, received erroneous data, which led it to override pilot commands and push the aircraft downwards."

 

I would have thought that a plane this modern and complex would of had double redundancy ?

 

 

I think the theory was that in the case of a sensor failure the crew would use the standard runaway trim procedure which would allow the aircraft to continue to fly safely.

 

There is one thing that I still can't understand about this whole situation. Did the runaway trim procedure call for the crew to use the yoke mounted controls to correct the trim before activating the electric trim cut-out switches? Or were they supposed to use the cut-out switches immediately and then use the trim-wheel to correct the trim? It seems like the Ethiopian crew did the latter, but it was impossible for them to use the trim wheel due to their excessive speed.


jarledb
Webhead
2808 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2380952 24-Dec-2019 15:15
Send private message

I still think the fact that the MCAS system was designed the way it was, and that there was no serious training of the pilots on the MAX shows how deeply flawed this whole project was.

 

Would not shed a tear if this breaks Boeing and the Max never fly again.


alasta
5671 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #2380992 24-Dec-2019 16:47
Send private message

jarledb:

 

Would not shed a tear if this breaks Boeing and the Max never fly again.

 

 

The market for large airliners in the western world is a duopoly. If that were to become a monopoly then that would have huge implications.

 

It's a shame we no longer have McDonnell Douglas or Lockheed in the civil aviation market.


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #2380997 24-Dec-2019 16:52
Send private message

jarledb:

 

I still think the fact that the MCAS system was designed the way it was, and that there was no serious training of the pilots on the MAX shows how deeply flawed this whole project was.

 

Would not shed a tear if this breaks Boeing and the Max never fly again.

 

 

I'm the exact opposite. I would happily fly on a MAX tomorrow if they were flying.

 

What is concerning is *every* other aircraft out there that hasn't had the same level of scrutiny that the MAX has now had, and since the 2 MAX crashes the number of flight control changes that have been made by both Airbus and Boeing on other aircraft.

 

 

 

 


kingdragonfly
7005 posts

Uber Geek


  #2381043 24-Dec-2019 17:07
Send private message

I'm very far away from being an aerospace engineer. I read that a set of stairs never caused so much trouble in an aircraft.

The Boeing 737-100 attached stairs to the fuselage that passengers climbed to board. Also ground crews could hand-lift heavy luggage into the cargo holds.

That low-to-the-ground design was a plus in 1968, hampered engineers modernizing the 737. The larger engines and altered aerodynamics meant complex flight control software system.

Boeing executives could have reworked the plane, but instead chose to "play the system" and go for the short term financial gain. They did everything they could to avoid recertification, and its flow on affect to pilot training costs.

I agree that China had ulterior motives for grounding the plane, but they accidentally did the right thing.

Otto von Bismarck: "Laws are like sausages -- it is best not to see them being made."

Technofreak
5414 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2381052 24-Dec-2019 17:59
Send private message

alasta:

FineWine:


https://www.bbc.com/news/business-50893490 "Boeing has said the MCAS software system, which relied on a single sensor, received erroneous data, which led it to override pilot commands and push the aircraft downwards."


I would have thought that a plane this modern and complex would of had double redundancy ?



I think the theory was that in the case of a sensor failure the crew would use the standard runaway trim procedure which would allow the aircraft to continue to fly safely.


There is one thing that I still can't understand about this whole situation. Did the runaway trim procedure call for the crew to use the yoke mounted controls to correct the trim before activating the electric trim cut-out switches? Or were they supposed to use the cut-out switches immediately and then use the trim-wheel to correct the trim? It seems like the Ethiopian crew did the latter, but it was impossible for them to use the trim wheel due to their excessive speed.



I think you are correct. The trim is supposed to be reset to a neutral position uding the control column switches THEN the cut out switches are used.

I think the Ethiopian crew were confused as to the correct process and turned the cut off switches off and on more than once.




Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


Technofreak
5414 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #2381055 24-Dec-2019 18:05
Send private message

sbiddle:

jarledb:


I still think the fact that the MCAS system was designed the way it was, and that there was no serious training of the pilots on the MAX shows how deeply flawed this whole project was.


Would not shed a tear if this breaks Boeing and the Max never fly again.



I'm the exact opposite. I would happily fly on a MAX tomorrow if they were flying.


What is concerning is *every* other aircraft out there that hasn't had the same level of scrutiny that the MAX has now had, and since the 2 MAX crashes the number of flight control changes that have been made by both Airbus and Boeing on other aircraft.


 


 



No one is talking about the uncommanded nose down events that have occurred in Airbus aircraft. Fortunately they occurred at an altitude where the aircraft wasn't in danger of hitting the ground. There were no fatalities but there have been some serious injuries. Look up QF 72.




Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


1 | ... | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

D-Link G415 4G Smart Router Review
Posted 27-Jun-2022 17:24


New Zealand Video Game Sales Reaches $540 Million
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:49


Github Copilot Generally Available to All Developers
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:37


Logitech G Introduces the New Astro A10 Headset
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:20


Fitbit introduces Sleep Profiles
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:11


Synology Introduces FlashStation FS3410
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:04


Intel Arc A380 Graphics First Available in China
Posted 15-Jun-2022 17:08


JBL Introduces PartyBox Encore Essential Speaker
Posted 15-Jun-2022 17:05


New TVNZ+ streaming brand launches
Posted 13-Jun-2022 08:35


Chromecast With Google TV Review
Posted 10-Jun-2022 17:10


Xbox Gaming on Your Samsung Smart TV No Console Required
Posted 10-Jun-2022 00:01


Xbox Cloud Gaming Now Available in New Zealand
Posted 10-Jun-2022 00:01


HP Envy Inspire 7900e Review
Posted 9-Jun-2022 20:31


Philips Hue Starter Kit Review
Posted 4-Jun-2022 11:10


Sony Expands Its Wireless Speaker X-series Range
Posted 4-Jun-2022 10:25









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.