Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
15358 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2984
Inactive user


  Reply # 2196760 12-Mar-2019 20:37
Send private message quote this post

Tracer:

 

PolicyGuy:

 

I don't believe any new / changed B737 MAX software or hardware has been approved or issued.
The only changes as far as I know, is to include documentation in the flight crew reference manuals that the MCAS exists, and how it works.

 

There are probably very serious discussions going on between Boeing and the main certification authorities (FAA & EASA) about how a system that is critical to flight safety can rely on a single sensor (Angle of Attack indicator) input with no redundancy, no 'voting', not even a 'disagree flag'
Just my $0.02

 

 

And whether FAA's decision to not require a new type rating given MCAS was the right one. Will be interesting to see if they double down, or ground all MAX until pilots can be trained for a new type rating. So far they appear to be doubling down.

 

 

IIRC the upgrade was minor, pilots do the boring familiarity training, also boring, as it was the same aircraft but modified. But it wasn't, the behaviour was not what a 737-xxx pilot expects. This new crash is that same reason, and if so its on the airline. Ethiopian has an apparently good record.


4250 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 825

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2196775 12-Mar-2019 20:47
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

Beccara:

 

Hmmmm, Reminds me of the rudder hard over issues with the 737 in the 90's. As a general point I tend to avoid new models from both Boeing and Airbus for at least 3-4 years, New designed in aviation tend to be proven in blood (mostly). This wouldn't be the first time a new class in the same family causes problems with pilot training (Thinking Kegworth)

 

 

I was going to mention that, but there were two issues. Wasn't sure the exact details. One, two went down, the rudder went hard over. The case was the rear door detached, airflow took it to the rudder. The other was a rudder hardcover due to a jammed piston that had ice buildup, but want sure if that was 737 or not. 

 

 

I'm not familiar with the incident of a cargo door hitting the rudder, but the rudder hardcover incidents relating to jammed PCU servo slides certainly involved 737 aircraft. There were two catastrophic accidents, one in 1991 and another in 1994. If I recall correctly it wasn't until 1996 when an aircraft encountered the same fault but managed to recover, and that lead investigators to finally determine the cause of those earlier two accidents.


 
 
 
 


15358 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2984
Inactive user


  Reply # 2196778 12-Mar-2019 20:52
Send private message quote this post

alasta:

 

tdgeek:

 

Beccara:

 

Hmmmm, Reminds me of the rudder hard over issues with the 737 in the 90's. As a general point I tend to avoid new models from both Boeing and Airbus for at least 3-4 years, New designed in aviation tend to be proven in blood (mostly). This wouldn't be the first time a new class in the same family causes problems with pilot training (Thinking Kegworth)

 

 

I was going to mention that, but there were two issues. Wasn't sure the exact details. One, two went down, the rudder went hard over. The case was the rear door detached, airflow took it to the rudder. The other was a rudder hardcover due to a jammed piston that had ice buildup, but want sure if that was 737 or not. 

 

 

I'm not familiar with the incident of a cargo door hitting the rudder, but the rudder hardcover incidents relating to jammed PCU servo slides certainly involved 737 aircraft. There were two catastrophic accidents, one in 1991 and another in 1994. If I recall correctly it wasn't until 1996 when an aircraft encountered the same fault but managed to recover, and that lead investigators to finally determine the cause of those earlier two accidents.

 

 

Yep I recall that. The flight went over the Arctic, it froze and left the grill jammed with ice. At the crash site the ice, the "criminal" had melted

 

The other was the rear passenger door, happened also twice. They knew it was a rudder issue, but the rudder was fine. A fault in the door lock I recall was the issue, it went always to the rudder went it broke, Ill see if I can find it


166 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 2196782 12-Mar-2019 21:10
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

Beccara:

 

TBH I've always been a little bit uneasy with the certification process for new models of the existing family, I understand the commercial reasons for it but if it turns out that these crashes are because of pilot unfamiliarity then it's another kegworth and another reason pilots at the very least shouldn't be bouncing between different models with 3-10 sim hours and a check ride

 

 

Im probably not up to date on this, I thought after Lion Air the issue was the new model is not the same as the old model, software wise. That was supposed to be fixed and updated across all aircraft? You cant just hop in the simulator to do the legal catchup.

 

 

No, FAA forced Boeing to expedite that software update as of today. They have until April. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-airplane-boeing/boeing-to-upgrade-software-in-737-max-8-fleet-in-weeks-idUSKBN1QT04X


166 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 2196784 12-Mar-2019 21:12
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

IIRC the upgrade was minor, pilots do the boring familiarity training, also boring, as it was the same aircraft but modified. But it wasn't, the behaviour was not what a 737-xxx pilot expects. This new crash is that same reason, and if so its on the airline. Ethiopian has an apparently good record.

 

 

The difference in behaviour is why it should be a separate type rating. Of course Boeing had a strong commercial interest to avoid that, because a big selling point of the MAX is that pilots don't need retrained if they already have 737 type rating.


1027 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 198

UberGroup

  Reply # 2196808 12-Mar-2019 21:49
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

alasta:

 

tdgeek:

 

Beccara:

 

Hmmmm, Reminds me of the rudder hard over issues with the 737 in the 90's. As a general point I tend to avoid new models from both Boeing and Airbus for at least 3-4 years, New designed in aviation tend to be proven in blood (mostly). This wouldn't be the first time a new class in the same family causes problems with pilot training (Thinking Kegworth)

 

 

I was going to mention that, but there were two issues. Wasn't sure the exact details. One, two went down, the rudder went hard over. The case was the rear door detached, airflow took it to the rudder. The other was a rudder hardcover due to a jammed piston that had ice buildup, but want sure if that was 737 or not. 

 

 

I'm not familiar with the incident of a cargo door hitting the rudder, but the rudder hardcover incidents relating to jammed PCU servo slides certainly involved 737 aircraft. There were two catastrophic accidents, one in 1991 and another in 1994. If I recall correctly it wasn't until 1996 when an aircraft encountered the same fault but managed to recover, and that lead investigators to finally determine the cause of those earlier two accidents.

 

 

Yep I recall that. The flight went over the Arctic, it froze and left the grill jammed with ice. At the crash site the ice, the "criminal" had melted

 

The other was the rear passenger door, happened also twice. They knew it was a rudder issue, but the rudder was fine. A fault in the door lock I recall was the issue, it went always to the rudder went it broke, Ill see if I can find it

 

 

 

 

Might be talking about two different things here, I'm talking about the PCU issue not involving any Arctic flying, UA 585 and USAir 427. The icing issue you might be referring to could be the 767 heat exchanger? That took out a Bejing to London BA flight IIRC.

 

 

 

The cargo door/rudder also might be the DC-10 and AA 96, Cargo door blew off due to design fault and took out the rudder cables causing a hard right





Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 

3527 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1465

Subscriber

  Reply # 2196822 12-Mar-2019 22:16
Send private message quote this post

The 737 Max has now been grounded in Australia.

https://i.stuff.co.nz/business/111201458/fiji-airways-will-continue-to-fly-boeing-737-max-8-after-ethiopian-airlines-crash





15358 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2984
Inactive user


  Reply # 2196870 13-Mar-2019 07:07
Send private message quote this post

Beccara:

 

 

 

Might be talking about two different things here, I'm talking about the PCU issue not involving any Arctic flying, UA 585 and USAir 427. The icing issue you might be referring to could be the 767 heat exchanger? That took out a Bejing to London BA flight IIRC.

 

 

 

The cargo door/rudder also might be the DC-10 and AA 96, Cargo door blew off due to design fault and took out the rudder cables causing a hard right

 

 

You are no doubt correct, the 737 rung a bell to me for some reason


166 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 2196871 13-Mar-2019 07:08
Send private message quote this post
15358 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2984
Inactive user


  Reply # 2196872 13-Mar-2019 07:10
Send private message quote this post

Tracer:

 

tdgeek:

 

IIRC the upgrade was minor, pilots do the boring familiarity training, also boring, as it was the same aircraft but modified. But it wasn't, the behaviour was not what a 737-xxx pilot expects. This new crash is that same reason, and if so its on the airline. Ethiopian has an apparently good record.

 

 

The difference in behaviour is why it should be a separate type rating. Of course Boeing had a strong commercial interest to avoid that, because a big selling point of the MAX is that pilots don't need retrained if they already have 737 type rating.

 

 

Yes, and that's the kicker. I cant understand why Boeing seems to have gotten away with this so lightly. They seemed to throw out a bulletin soon after LionAir, and its all ok now?


166 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 2196873 13-Mar-2019 07:11
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

MAXs turning around and going back home, must be expecting they'll be grounded for a while.

 


15358 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2984
Inactive user


  Reply # 2196875 13-Mar-2019 07:17
Send private message quote this post

It seems the only ones that don't want to ground it is the US Republican Party and Boeing. Wait for due process. Putting lives behind profits. If the cause was unrelated to LionAir and not a MAX issue it makes no difference, there is too much similarity and to close together to risk another


166 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 68


  Reply # 2196877 13-Mar-2019 07:23
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post
670 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 127


  Reply # 2196941 13-Mar-2019 08:39
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post


BDFL - Memuneh
62703 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 13387

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2196948 13-Mar-2019 08:54
Send private message quote this post
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic


Donate via Givealittle


Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon introduces new Kindle with adjustable front light
Posted 21-Mar-2019 20:14


A call from the companies providing internet access for the great majority of New Zealanders, to the companies with the greatest influence over social media content
Posted 19-Mar-2019 15:21


Two e-scooter companies selected for Wellington trial
Posted 15-Mar-2019 17:33


GeForce GTX 1660 available now
Posted 15-Mar-2019 08:47


Artificial Intelligence to double the rate of innovation in New Zealand by 2021
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:47


LG demonstrates smart home concepts at LG InnoFest
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:45


New Zealanders buying more expensive smartphones
Posted 11-Mar-2019 09:52


2degrees Offers Amazon Prime Video to Broadband Customers
Posted 8-Mar-2019 14:10


D-Link ANZ launches D-Fend AC2600 Wi-Fi Router Protected by McAfee
Posted 7-Mar-2019 11:09


Slingshot commissions celebrities to design new modems
Posted 5-Mar-2019 08:58


Symantec Annual Threat Report reveals more ambitious, destructive and stealthy attacks
Posted 28-Feb-2019 10:14


FUJIFILM launches high performing X-T30
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:40


Netflix is killing content piracy says research
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:33


Trend Micro finds shifting threats require kiwis to rethink security priorities
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:27


Mainfreight uses Spark IoT Asset Tracking service
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:25



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.