Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | ... | 1158
Webhead
2518 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1696285 29-Dec-2016 19:26
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:
And you feel that made Democrats change their vote in huge numbers?

 

 

You know, if the majority were to win in the US, there would be no president. The majority of people didn't vote.

 

At second place was Hillary Clinton, with almost 3 million more votes than Trump. And Hillary got more votes than any other US president of all time, with the exception of Obama.

 

You tell me, does that seem like a healthy democratic system to you?

 

 

People weren't forced or deprived

 

 

Oh people were deprived. The Republicans have been working on "fixing the system" for a good long time. In areas where there are a lot of black voters, that typically vote for the Democratic party, they have made the ID-laws much strickter. To "fix voter fraud" (which isn't an actual problem).

 

 


Webhead
2518 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1696286 29-Dec-2016 19:27
Send private message quote this post

Oh, and there might be at least one person that was forced...

 


 
 
 
 


21156 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1696288 29-Dec-2016 19:28
Send private message quote this post

JWR:

 

tdgeek:

 

JWR:

 

tdgeek: 

Democracy isn't idealistic. And it's not really a preference. The end user, I.e the citizens choose a leader. That's not idealism at all. The only thing I can think of to improve democracy it to make it illegal not to vote. But if you don't have to vote and you don't, that's tough bikkies. The people have spoken, not a law or dictator, that's the difference

 

That is an idealistic reply.

 



I'll correct you. That is your opinion. If you locate a means to allow the populous to vote 100% for a new leader, we have perfection. That will never happen. At the other end is a dictator. End of the day, every few years, the populous votes

 

 

Already said it was my opinion.

 

Yet, you are intent on 'correcting me!', Do you have a CONTROL complex?

 

People have been arguing Democracy for a couple of thousand years.

 

Yet, it is possible to see what is more or less Democratic in the modern World.

 

 


That is an idealistic reply does not infer that is your opinion.
No, I don't have a control complex, although I tire when hackles rise because someone does not agree with someone else.
Give us your learned improvement in democracy then.

Same old thing, a discussion ends up like this. A vs B and not the discussion


21156 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1696289 29-Dec-2016 19:35
Send private message quote this post

jarledb:

tdgeek:
And you feel that made Democrats change their vote in huge numbers?



You know, if the majority were to win in the US, there would be no president. The majority of people didn't vote.


At second place was Hillary Clinton, with almost 3 million more votes than Trump.


You tell me, does that seem like a healthy democratic system to you?



People weren't forced or deprived



Oh people were deprived. The Republicans have been working on "fixing the system" for a good long time. In areas where there are a lot of black voters, that typically vote for the Democratic party, they have made the ID-laws much strickter. To "fix voter fraud" (which isn't an actual problem).


 


I do hear you. We have that here, if many don't vote that's their choice, tough. They have the ability to vote but they didn't. They cannot complain. The answer is compulsory voting which I think Australia has in some form

Here, we change electoral boundaries, same thing, it changes the ability to win or lose a seat. Voter fraud? It exists. Proper ID? Won't that help? But it's like that here, many don't vote. Here, your are legally required to be on the electoral role, but don't have to vote. That should change

gzt

11542 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1696292 29-Dec-2016 19:43
Send private message quote this post

JWR & tdgeek, I hope one of you reduces the quote length on the next reply. ; )

21156 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1696294 29-Dec-2016 19:46
Send private message quote this post

gzt: JWR & tdgeek, I hope one of you reduces the quote length on the next reply. ; )


I know, I'll pay for the ink! Oh no ink needed! I'm outside on the iPad which isn't easy to manage quotes, but your right

126 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user


  #1696297 29-Dec-2016 19:50
Send private message quote this post

jarledb:

 

tdgeek:
And you feel that made Democrats change their vote in huge numbers?

 

 

You know, if the majority were to win in the US, there would be no president. The majority of people didn't vote.

 

At second place was Hillary Clinton, with almost 3 million more votes than Trump.

 

You tell me, does that seem like a healthy democratic system to you?

 

 

People weren't forced or deprived

 

 

Oh people were deprived. The Republicans have been working on "fixing the system" for a good long time. In areas where there are a lot of black voters, that typically vote for the Democratic party, they have made the ID-laws much strickter. To "fix voter fraud" (which isn't an actual problem).

 

 

Interesting view you have there.  Actually, voter fraud is fairly common.  Incidentally why wouldn't you expect voters to have IDs?  Is there a problem with a person getting an ID?  Come to think of it, you can't vote anywhere in NZ without proving your identity can you?   Also, why do you suppose it is that minorities generally vote the Democratic party ticket?

 

Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic.  If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.  There would never be a need to go to Podunk, Arkansas to get Billy Bubba's vote.  Each state is worth a different number of representatives and the goal is to sew up those states with the highest representative count.  This is where the term "Fly Over States" comes from.  Who gives a hoot about a scraggly, low-population state.  The coastal states represent the fatted calf and this is where Hillary choked up.  They targeted the big ticket states and neglected the fly-overs.  Unfortunately, the big ticket states had had enough of Obama and didn't want a 3rd term of it.  Consequently, she lost the big ticket states and the fly-over states just ignored her.

 

Peace... good talk.  I enjoy politics.


 
 
 
 


21156 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1696299 29-Dec-2016 19:53
Send private message quote this post

JimsonWeed:

jarledb:


tdgeek:
And you feel that made Democrats change their vote in huge numbers?



You know, if the majority were to win in the US, there would be no president. The majority of people didn't vote.


At second place was Hillary Clinton, with almost 3 million more votes than Trump.


You tell me, does that seem like a healthy democratic system to you?



People weren't forced or deprived



Oh people were deprived. The Republicans have been working on "fixing the system" for a good long time. In areas where there are a lot of black voters, that typically vote for the Democratic party, they have made the ID-laws much strickter. To "fix voter fraud" (which isn't an actual problem).



Interesting view you have there.  Actually, voter fraud is fairly common.  Incidentally why wouldn't you expect voters to have IDs?  Is there a problem with a person getting an ID?  Come to think of it, you can't vote anywhere in NZ without proving your identity can you?   Also, why do you suppose it is that minorities generally vote the Democratic party ticket?


Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic.  If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.  There would never be a need to go to Podunk, Arkansas to get Billy Bubba's vote.  Each state is worth a different number of representatives and the goal is to sew up those states with the highest representative count.  This is where the term "Fly Over States" comes from.  Who gives a hoot about a scraggly, low-population state.  The coastal states represent the fatted calf and this is where Hillary choked up.  They targeted the big ticket states and neglected the fly-overs.  Unfortunately, the big ticket states had had enough of Obama and didn't want a 3rd term of it.  Consequently, she lost the big ticket states and the fly-over states just ignored her.


Peace... good talk.  I enjoy politics.



Had enough of Obama was a huge negative for them. And like here, multi term parties fade "time for a change"

JWR

798 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1696303 29-Dec-2016 20:02
quote this post

gzt: JWR & tdgeek, I hope one of you reduces the quote length on the next reply. ; )

 

LOL. Agreed!

 

System a bit buggy tho:)


gzt

11542 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1696305 29-Dec-2016 20:09
Send private message quote this post

JimsonWeed: Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic. If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.

Once again, your logic is flawed and based on an incorrect understanding of the electoral college.

JWR

798 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1696308 29-Dec-2016 20:12
quote this post

gzt:
JimsonWeed: Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic. If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.

Once again, your logic is flawed and based on an incorrect understanding of the electoral college.

 

 

 

No, they should clearly focus on the marginal states in that scenario.


JWR

798 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1696310 29-Dec-2016 20:17
quote this post

JWR:

 

gzt:
JimsonWeed: Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic. If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.

Once again, your logic is flawed and based on an incorrect understanding of the electoral college.

 

 

 

No, they should clearly focus on the marginal states in that scenario.

 

 

Sorry that is also incorrect. .. Focus on marginal states with easiest and/or greatest gains.

 

You would have to do the math to work out what is more or less valuable.


126 posts

Master Geek
Inactive user


  #1696311 29-Dec-2016 20:22
Send private message quote this post

gzt:
JimsonWeed: Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic. If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.

Once again, your logic is flawed and based on an incorrect understanding of the electoral college.

 

 

 

Ah well.. let's agree to disagree.  :)

 

In the meantime, consider the points discussed in this book. You can reference it at books.google.co.nz with the search criteria, "electoral college".

 

 

 

Bugh, G. (Ed.). (2016). Electoral College Reform: Challenges and Possibilities. Routledge.

 

 

 

Cheers


JWR

798 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1696325 29-Dec-2016 20:53
quote this post

JimsonWeed:

 

gzt:
JimsonWeed: Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic. If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.

Once again, your logic is flawed and based on an incorrect understanding of the electoral college.

 

 

 

Ah well.. let's agree to disagree.  :)

 

In the meantime, consider the points discussed in this book. You can reference it at books.google.co.nz with the search criteria, "electoral college".

 

 

 

Bugh, G. (Ed.). (2016). Electoral College Reform: Challenges and Possibilities. Routledge.

 

 

 

Cheers

 


gzt

11542 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1696328 29-Dec-2016 21:00
Send private message quote this post

JimsonWeed:

gzt:
JimsonWeed: Again... relying on the popular vote by itself is flawed logic. If it were just based on popular voting, all the candidates would need to do is focus on California, Florida, New York, and Texas.

Once again, your logic is flawed and based on an incorrect understanding of the electoral college.


 


Ah well.. let's agree to disagree.  :)


In the meantime, consider the points discussed in this book. You can reference it at books.google.co.nz with the search criteria, "electoral college".


 


Bugh, G. (Ed.). (2016). Electoral College Reform: Challenges and Possibilities. Routledge.


 


Cheers


I don't think we are at that stage yet! : ). Fact:

- Florida has approx 17% of the population of the USA
- Florida has approx 17% of the votes in the electoral college

Both true. You are continuing to claim that Donald Trump won because the electoral college was created so that states with large populations would have less influence. That claim is clearly not accurate on many levels.

Those are the facts.


1 | ... | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 189 | 190 | 191 | ... | 1158
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




News »

Freeview On Demand app launches on Sony Android TVs
Posted 6-Aug-2020 13:35


UFB hits more than one million connections
Posted 6-Aug-2020 09:42


D-Link A/NZ extends COVR Wi-Fi EasyMesh System series with new three-pack
Posted 4-Aug-2020 15:01


New Zealand software Rfider tracks coffee from Colombia all the way to New Zealand businesses
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:35


Logitech G launches Pro X Wireless gaming headset
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:21


Sony Alpha 7S III provides supreme imaging performance
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:11


Sony introduces first CFexpress Type A memory card
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:05


Marsello acquires Goody consolidating online and in-store marketing position
Posted 30-Jul-2020 16:26


Fonterra first major customer for Microsoft's New Zealand datacentre
Posted 30-Jul-2020 08:07


Everything we learnt at the IBM Cloud Forum 2020
Posted 29-Jul-2020 14:45


Dropbox launches native HelloSign workflow and data residency in Australia
Posted 29-Jul-2020 12:48


Spark launches 5G in Palmerston North
Posted 29-Jul-2020 09:50


Lenovo brings speed and smarter features to new 5G mobile gaming phone
Posted 28-Jul-2020 22:00


Withings raises $60 million to enable bridge between patients and healthcare
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:51


QNAP integrates Catalyst Cloud Object Storage into Hybrid Backup solution
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:40



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.