![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Howard Stern is thoroughly disgusted by the deposition in the Carroll case given by his one-time BFF, Trump: https://uproxx.com/viral/howard-stern-trump-e-jean-carroll-deposition/
Trump found guilty of 'sexual abuse' (not rape). He still has to pay five million though.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic: Trump found guilty of 'sexual abuse' (not rape). He still has to pay five million though.
Here is The Times version:
The NY Times - Jury Sides With Writer Who Says That Trump Sexually Abused Her
breaking
Trump is found liable for sexual abuse in civil trial.
A Manhattan jury on Tuesday found former President Donald J. Trump liable for the sexual abuse of the magazine writer E. Jean Carroll in a widely watched civil trial that sought to apply the accountability of the #MeToo era to a dominant political figure.
The federal jury of six men and three women took only three hours before returning a verdict.
They also held Mr. Trump, 76, liable for defaming Ms. Carroll when he posted a statement on his Truth Social website in October, calling her case “a complete con job” and “a Hoax and a lie.”
Although more than a dozen women have accused Mr. Trump of sexual misconduct over the years, Ms. Carroll’s case is the first claim to be successfully tested before a jury.
The jury determined that Carroll had proven Mr. Trump sexually abused her, but they rejected the accusation that she had been raped.
Sexual abuse is defined in New York as subjecting someone to sexual contact without their consent. Rape is defined as sexual intercourse without consent.
The jury awarded Ms. Carroll, 79, a total of $5 million in damages.
The jury’s unanimous verdict came in Federal District Court in lower Manhattan. Its findings are civil, not criminal, meaning Mr. Trump has not been convicted of any crime and faces no prison time.
Jury also found that Mr. Carroll proved, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Ms. Carroll was injured as a result of Trump’s publication of his denial of her accusations on his Truth Social account in October 2022.
The jury determined that Ms. Carroll had proved, by clear and convincing evidence, that Mr. Trump knew his statement was false when he said her accusation was a hoax, a legal standard known as “actual malice.”
EDIT Trump's predictable response:
On Truth Social, Trump responded: “I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHO THIS WOMAN IS. THIS VERDICT IS A DISGRACE - A CONTINUATION OF THE GREATEST WITCH HUNT OF ALL TIME!””
Sideface
His lawyers would have cost more than the fine, I wonder who he will pay first ?
Whilst the difficult we can do immediately, the impossible takes a bit longer. However, miracles you will have to wait for.
Sideface:
EDIT Trump's predictable response:
On Truth Social, Trump responded: “WAH WAH LOOK AT ME AND GIVE ME ATTENTION, I'M SUCH A VICTIM, WHY CAN'T I DO ANYTHING I WANT ANYTIME AT ALL WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES, NO MATTER HOW BAD IT IS??? IT'S NOT FAIRRRRRRR!!!””
(alternate response)
Good job, jury made the right call. But even more predictably now he'll appeal, and it will drag on forever. Hope his lawyer likes working for free.
FineWine:His lawyers would have cost more than the fine, I wonder who he will pay first ?
PAY + Trump = A mutually exclusive equation!
Read the Completed Jury Verdict Form in the Trump-Carroll Case
NY Times, 09 May 2023
Download the original document (pdf) [free download]
An interesting document in plain English, prepared for the jury.
Sideface
That's a common thing of his I've noticed when Trump's boxed into a corner - he trots out the line of "I don't know this person" or "I barely know this person", never mind the photographic evidence that proves it 🙄
The NY Times - The Complete List of Trump’s Twitter Insults (2015-2021)
published Jan 2021
As a political figure, Donald J. Trump used Twitter to praise, to cajole, to entertain, to lobby, to establish his version of events - and, perhaps most notably, to amplify his scorn.
This list documents the verbal attacks Mr. Trump posted on Twitter, from when he declared his candidacy in June 2015 to Jan. 8 [2021], when Twitter permanently barred him.
Encyclopedic - literally thousands of insults! You have been warned. 🙂
Sideface
The kind of people who adore Trump will probably see this verdict as some sort of twisted badge of achievement, in the sense that he did something most of them would not have a problem with and many would probably like to do.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Speaking of which...
https://boingboing.net/2023/05/09/told-to-stfu-trump-immediately-violates-a-judges-orders.html
I knew it wouldn't take him long to trot out the tired old "witch hunt" line. But more importantly is there anything they can do to gag him from saying this kind of crap in public? Hold him in contempt of court or something?
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |