![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Handsomedan:They're not just underage kids with no ability to vote - there's a massive fanbase who see her (for some weird reason) as the Messiah.
Well for someone who's so witty and knowledgeable about computer security you've got to admire her.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/trump-bucks-scam-1234743556/
Not sure if this was posted in here already or not, and it's from last year, but it goes a long way to proving the old adage "a fool and his money are soon parted".
and pretending it's your own.
I wonder if these Trump coin-things would go up in value after he dies? (note that I don't want him dead or anything, but genuinely curious).
I can see the MAGA crowd falling over themselves to get their hands on this junk (which is literally what it is) but I don't imagine much interest from the general public outside that group otherwise.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Trump heads to US Supreme Court with a familiar claim: He is untouchable
WASHINGTON, Feb 5 (Reuters) - Donald Trump will try to persuade the U.S. Supreme Court this week to reverse a judicial decision to kick him off the ballot in Colorado over his actions concerning the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack, arguing that the constitutional provision his opponents cite does not apply to him as a former president.
It may not be the only time Trump makes this type of assertion to the justices. As he fights four criminal cases and civil litigation in lower courts, Trump has repeatedly advanced a bold argument: that he is formally immune or otherwise not subject to these legal challenges.
"Trump appears obsessed with trying to place himself above the law. The theme running throughout these claims is that he cannot be held liable at law for anything he has done," said constitutional law expert Michael Gerhardt, a University of North Carolina law professor. "No president or former president has made such outlandish, self-serving claims."
The Supreme Court, whose 6-3 conservative majority includes three Trump appointees, is scheduled* to hear Trump's appeal of a ruling by Colorado's top court that disqualified him from the state's Republican primary ballot under the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment for engaging in insurrection. ...
* on Thursday
Sideface
I don't think his immunity argument really holds weight, eh. If that really was the case, there's nothing to stop any president (not just Trump) assassinating someone for example, then claiming "immunity". It sounds ridiculous, but it's probably totally plausible in his world 🙄
in 1978, Congress lifted disqualification for dead Confederates traitors for general Robert E. Lee and Confederate president Jefferson Davis.
gzt: Lee recanted and wanted his citizenship back. Jefferson was the exact opposite. Over 100 years later longtime southern democratic politician President Carter was the reason for the pardon. Some say it was the price of Carter's pardon for Vietnam era draft objectors. Perhaps this is something Trump can look forward to in 100 years.
Turns out Trump's immunity bs case was just that, a bs case: https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-court-ruling-immunity-election-subversion-prosecution/index.html
Of course, he's going to appeal and waste more time (and his supporter's money) 🙄
I hope that all gets thrown out too.
quickymart: Turns out Trump's immunity bs case was just that, a bs case ...
The NY Times - Federal Appeals Court Rejects Trump’s Claim of Absolute Immunity
A federal appeals court on Tuesday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s claim that he was immune to charges of plotting to subvert the results of the 2020 election, ruling that he must go to trial on a criminal indictment accusing him of seeking to overturn his loss to President Biden.
The unanimous ruling, by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, handed Mr. Trump a significant defeat. But it was unlikely to be the final word on his claims of executive immunity: Mr. Trump, who is on a path to locking up the Republican presidential nomination, is expected to continue his appeal to the Supreme Court. ...
The panel, composed of two judges appointed by Democrats and one Republican appointee, said in its decision that, despite the privileges of the office he once held, Mr. Trump was subject to federal criminal law like any other American. ...
The three judges cast Mr. Trump’s immunity claims as a danger to the nation’s constitutional system.
“At bottom, former President Trump’s stance would collapse our system of separated powers by placing the president beyond the reach of all three branches. Presidential immunity against federal indictment would mean that, as to the president, the Congress could not legislate, the executive could not prosecute and the judiciary could not review. We cannot accept that the office of the presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter.”
Despite this verdict, Trump has again succeeded in his main objective - delay, delay, delay ... 🙄
EDIT: A quote from the panel of judges :
“For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant.
"... any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as president no longer protects him against this prosecution.”
Sideface
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |