Well, at least TRY to understand what I am saying about "relevance". I'm not trying to be insulting here but, mate... really...
I reject what you're saying.
You're the one who was making the claim that Obama was/is a sh*t president. You haven't produced a scrap of evidence or any credible allegation to support that claim.
Presented with evidence that with unemployment, job creation, economic growth improving over his 8 year term, you disingenuously argue that that the data is "drivel" and then go on to say that the correlation has nothing to do with Obama, as in your opinion it's an irrelevant coincidence.
That's truly "SAD".