Fred99:
The demographics behind that name change make a remarkable statement about how divided America is:
The biggest surprise there is that Fox has the highest "trustworthiness" rating among independents, I wouldn't have expected that.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Fred99:
The demographics behind that name change make a remarkable statement about how divided America is:
The biggest surprise there is that Fox has the highest "trustworthiness" rating among independents, I wouldn't have expected that.
You are talking about America. Fox has bamboozled a lot of people there. Also, 'independent' does not necessarily mean 'progressive'. A lot of those people may rank Fox with the 'liberal' media. The real alt-right is convinced that everything is a huge government conspiracy.
I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
Rikkitic:
You are talking about America. Fox has bamboozled a lot of people there. Also, 'independent' does not necessarily mean 'progressive'. A lot of those people may rank Fox with the 'liberal' media.
My brother lives in the USA and voted for Trump. He's not stupid or racist or sexist or xenophobic or islamophobic. The reasons for that vote were that he wanted change, and didn't trust Hillary. I believe that a lot of Americans are in the same boat.
Despite me, um, "sharing my concerns" about Trump, I believe my brother still supports him (although the vehemence seems to have dropped a notch). One argument that he used was that we outsiders are fed a diet of distortion and fake news by CNN et al. And, having recently visited there, I can confirm that the news we see *is* different from what they see. For one thing, there's a lot more Trump on our news than theirs. And of course Trump news is all negative (there being no actual positives, IMHO). But my point is that we are equally bamboozled by whatever news sources we rely on. It could even be that Fox is right.
Another interesting thing is that Trump really isn't all that important to Americans (presumably that's why he's not on the news as much). They have a great deal of faith in their Constitution and legal systems and so on to filter any radical ideas that *any* American (President, Senator, judge, general, or Joe Public) into a moderate change. So it doesn't matter terribly to have a crazy POTUS because the checks and balances will keep the country from doing anything crazy. I think that Bernie Sanders (viewed by many as a loony left pinko) got to be a Senator on the same basis... he's kinda crazy, but has some good ideas.
The real alt-right is convinced that everything is a huge government conspiracy.
The alt.left too. ;)
Fred99:The demographics behind that name change make a remarkable statement about how divided America is:
frankv:
Rikkitic:
You are talking about America. Fox has bamboozled a lot of people there. Also, 'independent' does not necessarily mean 'progressive'. A lot of those people may rank Fox with the 'liberal' media.
My brother lives in the USA and voted for Trump. He's not stupid or racist or sexist or xenophobic or islamophobic. The reasons for that vote were that he wanted change, and didn't trust Hillary. I believe that a lot of Americans are in the same boat.
Despite me, um, "sharing my concerns" about Trump, I believe my brother still supports him (although the vehemence seems to have dropped a notch). One argument that he used was that we outsiders are fed a diet of distortion and fake news by CNN et al. And, having recently visited there, I can confirm that the news we see *is* different from what they see. For one thing, there's a lot more Trump on our news than theirs. And of course Trump news is all negative (there being no actual positives, IMHO). But my point is that we are equally bamboozled by whatever news sources we rely on. It could even be that Fox is right.
Another interesting thing is that Trump really isn't all that important to Americans (presumably that's why he's not on the news as much). They have a great deal of faith in their Constitution and legal systems and so on to filter any radical ideas that *any* American (President, Senator, judge, general, or Joe Public) into a moderate change. So it doesn't matter terribly to have a crazy POTUS because the checks and balances will keep the country from doing anything crazy. I think that Bernie Sanders (viewed by many as a loony left pinko) got to be a Senator on the same basis... he's kinda crazy, but has some good ideas.
The real alt-right is convinced that everything is a huge government conspiracy.
The alt.left too. ;)
What I bolded is what I have always thought. Its a common issue in elections when one party has been in power for a while. Plus, not being a politician can easily be seen as a positive, especially given how Americans view politicians in general
@frankv:
Another interesting thing is that Trump really isn't all that important to Americans (presumably that's why he's not on the news as much). They have a great deal of faith in their Constitution and legal systems and so on to filter any radical ideas that *any* American (President, Senator, judge, general, or Joe Public) into a moderate change. So it doesn't matter terribly to have a crazy POTUS because the checks and balances will keep the country from doing anything crazy. I think that Bernie Sanders (viewed by many as a loony left pinko) got to be a Senator on the same basis... he's kinda crazy, but has some good ideas.
What people seem to ignore is that a Constitution is as good as the people defending it. How many times we've seen countries with good Constitutions just going down the path of dictatorships? A weak leader, a revolt and some opportunist that can claim "I alone can solve this!" followed by "But I need you to understand some changes are needed" and down goes the Constitution...
Sharesies investment funds | Geekzone broadband switch | Backblaze backup (Geekzone aff) | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) | My technology disclosure
frankv:The reasons for that vote were that he wanted change, and didn't trust Hillary. I believe that a lot of Americans are in the same boat.
That I can almost understand. What I don't understand is the continued support now that after several months in office he has proven to be ineffective at best.
freitasm:
@frankv:
Another interesting thing is that Trump really isn't all that important to Americans (presumably that's why he's not on the news as much). They have a great deal of faith in their Constitution and legal systems and so on to filter any radical ideas that *any* American (President, Senator, judge, general, or Joe Public) into a moderate change. So it doesn't matter terribly to have a crazy POTUS because the checks and balances will keep the country from doing anything crazy. I think that Bernie Sanders (viewed by many as a loony left pinko) got to be a Senator on the same basis... he's kinda crazy, but has some good ideas.
What people seem to ignore is that a Constitution is as good as the people defending it. How many times we've seen countries with good Constitutions just going down the path of dictatorships? A weak leader, a revolt and some opportunist that can claim "I alone can solve this!" followed by "But I need you to understand some changes are needed" and down goes the Constitution...
All I can say is that so far it seems to be working. Trump has (so far) proved to be quite ineffectual when it comes to actually implementing his changes. The States, the Supreme Court, the DOJ; all seem to be keeping him in line.
Paul1977:
frankv:The reasons for that vote were that he wanted change, and didn't trust Hillary. I believe that a lot of Americans are in the same boat.
That I can almost understand. What I don't understand is the continued support now that after several months in office he has proven to be ineffective at best.
Yeah, I'm not saying I fully understand it either.
I suspect there's some confirmation bias; people see in Trump what they want to see.
And that there's a patriotic, nationalistic aspect; it's seen as disrespectful to your country to diss its leader. Plus, a country should unite behind its leader, even if they disagree with him.
And no-one wants to admit they've made a mistake; sit it out for another 3.5 years and they'll never have to do that. Especially since he's been ineffective. You can blame his impotence on the Dems and the SCOTUS and anyone else, and sing the praises of the pie in the sky that would surely have come to be if it hadn't been for all those negative people. Whilst privately being glad he's being prevented from doing any real harm, and counting down to November 2020.
frankv:
Paul1977:
frankv:The reasons for that vote were that he wanted change, and didn't trust Hillary. I believe that a lot of Americans are in the same boat.
That I can almost understand. What I don't understand is the continued support now that after several months in office he has proven to be ineffective at best.
Yeah, I'm not saying I fully understand it either.
I suspect there's some confirmation bias; people see in Trump what they want to see.
You mention this in a couple of paragraphs later but reality is that not many people are tall enough to stand up and say "I was wrong, and I voted for the wrong ideas".
frankv:
And that there's a patriotic, nationalistic aspect; it's seen as disrespectful to your country to diss its leader. Plus, a country should unite behind its leader, even if they disagree with him.
And that's the worst thing... Patriotism is not following the leader blindly. Patriotism is the support of one's country, not of one's President. You can respect the Office but not necessarily have respect by the occupant of the office.
"Dissent is the highest form of patriotism" is often attributed to Thomas Jefferson. Regardless it's absolutely true. If one sees that their country is being taken the utmost patriotic action is to show dissent.
Sharesies investment funds | Geekzone broadband switch | Backblaze backup (Geekzone aff) | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) | My technology disclosure
Apparently Trumpy said this about his dad: "Back in the early 2000s, my father starting losing his grip on reality. He started to believe that everyone was out to get him."
DarthKermit:
Apparently Trumpy said this about his dad: "Back in the early 2000s, my father starting losing his grip on reality. He started to believe that everyone was out to get him."
No, Trump didn't say that. This quote comes from this article and the author is talking about her dad, not Trump talking about his dad. Read again for context.
Sharesies investment funds | Geekzone broadband switch | Backblaze backup (Geekzone aff) | Amazon (Geekzone aff) | MightyApe (Geekzone aff) | My technology disclosure
freitasm:
DarthKermit:
Apparently Trumpy said this about his dad: "Back in the early 2000s, my father starting losing his grip on reality. He started to believe that everyone was out to get him."
No, Trump didn't say that. This quote comes from this article and the author is talking about her dad, not Trump talking about his dad. Read again for context.
Proves how easy fake news is able to be propagated....
frankv:freitasm:@frankv:Another interesting thing is that Trump really isn't all that important to Americans (presumably that's why he's not on the news as much). They have a great deal of faith in their Constitution and legal systems and so on to filter any radical ideas that *any* American (President, Senator, judge, general, or Joe Public) into a moderate change. So it doesn't matter terribly to have a crazy POTUS because the checks and balances will keep the country from doing anything crazy. I think that Bernie Sanders (viewed by many as a loony left pinko) got to be a Senator on the same basis... he's kinda crazy, but has some good ideas.
What people seem to ignore is that a Constitution is as good as the people defending it. How many times we've seen countries with good Constitutions just going down the path of dictatorships? A weak leader, a revolt and some opportunist that can claim "I alone can solve this!" followed by "But I need you to understand some changes are needed" and down goes the Constitution...
All I can say is that so far it seems to be working. Trump has (so far) proved to be quite ineffectual when it comes to actually implementing his changes. The States, the Supreme Court, the DOJ; all seem to be keeping him in line.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |