Trump for Prezi...

1 | ... | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | ... | 109

6942 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3609

Reply # 1654884 20-Oct-2016 08:21

...and talking about spying, it turns out that Assange was "unplugged" by the Ecuadorean government - not UK/US "spooks" jamming/cutting communication. They claim they did that because they don't want to be implicated in interference / meddling in the democratic process - that they weren't "leaned on" by the US.

This sideshow has me baffled. The "leaks" so far show up Clinton for being a politician, I don't see anything surprising there, that's what they do - spin stuff to suit the audience. Here too.

Perhaps Assange is sitting on something that could be really disruptive. If Clinton beats Trump, then Assange immediately drops a bombshell when he's plugged back in, that'll be very nice for the USA.

Meanwhile, Assange has changed from being folk hero trying to play the high moral ground ticket, to using Wikileaks as a weapon to retaliate against the entire US, which he appears to hate.

Rikkitic

Glurp
7789 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3635

Subscriber

Reply # 1654907 20-Oct-2016 09:06

I think Assange has good reason to hate the US, but I don't see how unplugging him would stop Wikileaks from publishing anything. He is already at the mercy of the Ecuadorians.

I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage

Batman

Mad Scientist
18695 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2379

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1654909 20-Oct-2016 09:15

It's ok the Russians have Snowden

Fred99

6942 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3609

Reply # 1654916 20-Oct-2016 09:39

Rikkitic:

I think Assange has good reason to hate the US, but I don't see how unplugging him would stop Wikileaks from publishing anything. He is already at the mercy of the Ecuadorians.

In that case you must believe the Ecuadorians in saying that their decision to unplug Assange wasn't due to them being leaned on by the US.

Assange isn't going to sabotage his only refuge - as you say he's at the mercy of the Ecuadorians.

networkn

17551 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5049

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1654944 20-Oct-2016 10:12

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids.

Rikkitic

Glurp
7789 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3635

Subscriber

Reply # 1654951 20-Oct-2016 10:26

Agree completely. I still think Clinton is the lesser of evils but neither is fit to be President. I sure wish they could do this over.

I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage

networkn

17551 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5049

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1654961 20-Oct-2016 10:37

Rikkitic:

Agree completely. I still think Clinton is the lesser of evils but neither is fit to be President. I sure wish they could do this over.

I don't think it would make any difference. Americans CHOSE these candidates. They appeal for a variety of (very) different reasons.

The reality is we will probably never understand, but then we don't really need to, it's not our country.

Fred99

6942 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3609

Reply # 1654962 20-Oct-2016 10:38

networkn:

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids.

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies. Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

networkn

17551 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5049

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1654966 20-Oct-2016 10:45

Fred99:

networkn:

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids.

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies. Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted.

Batman

Mad Scientist
18695 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2379

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1654974 20-Oct-2016 10:51

networkn:

Fred99:

networkn:

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids.

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies. Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted.

Maybe it's her age/health ie not as sharp as you hope she'd be? At least that's what I am getting across from Trump.

Fred99

6942 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3609

Reply # 1654992 20-Oct-2016 11:01

networkn:

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted.

I don't want to be accused of sexism, but it's difficult for a women to "shout down" a male opponent without presenting an appearance of being hysterical. There have certainly been some women who've got over this very very well - Thatcher, our own Helen Clark, and others when in their prime, were extremely quick-witted and talented - with a few off the cuff words delivered with superb timing - they could demolish opposition attacks. That left the male attackers screaming at a woman - an even worse bullying look - so they'd just concede.

Clinton just hasn't got it.

Batman

Mad Scientist
18695 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2379

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1654998 20-Oct-2016 11:12

One person supports this post

Fred99:

Clinton just hasn't got it.

Or that.

Pumpedd

1758 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 894

Reply # 1655056 20-Oct-2016 12:35

networkn:

Fred99:

networkn:

To me, for Clinton to win this last debate, she needs to drop the attacks on him and concentrate on talking about her policies. She can't out nasty him and the last debate was a circus. Neither were shown in a good light, neither looked particularly Presidential bickering like school kids.

Perhaps - but I don't think anybody cares to listen to detail of policies. Trump won't want to discuss policy or facts - they're his greatest failing.

I'm expecting Clinton to follow-up on Obama's attacks on Trump's character over the past few days - and for it to be a very messy debacle. It's not what she says - it's how she delivers it whilst trying to maintain "the high ground" that will decide - I'm not confident that Clinton can deliver, she'll sound "scripted".

Yes, I'd agree she does come across quite wooden during these events. It's a shame. She has the stronger platform, not really sure why she needs to be quite so scripted.

How would you handle debating with a person like Trump knowing he is going to focus on your husband and even having so called husbands ex lovers sitting in room. I think she handled it quite well...she stated at the start that she was going to take the high road...but when confronted with so many lies and garbage she got a bit off topic.

Not saying I support her...but in comparison to her bullying opponent she is miles more ready to be the leader of USA, than the other person.

SaltyNZ

4462 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1962

Trusted

Subscriber

Reply # 1655110 20-Oct-2016 14:18

Pumpedd:

How would you handle debating with a person like Trump knowing he is going to focus on your husband and even having so called husbands ex lovers sitting in room. I think she handled it quite well...she stated at the start that she was going to take the high road...but when confronted with so many lies and garbage she got a bit off topic.

Not saying I support her...but in comparison to her bullying opponent she is miles more ready to be the leader of USA, than the other person.

If it was me, I'd probably lead with something along the lines of 'I honestly don't know how to debate someone who can deny themselves 10 times in 5 seconds and absolutely believe that every statement was true.'

iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.

networkn

17551 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5049

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 1655123 20-Oct-2016 14:43

Wow, so far it's pretty good! Both are better than they have been. Clinton is better, but Trump is somewhat coherent.

1 | ... | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 100 | 101 | 102 | 103 | 104 | 105 | 106 | ... | 109