Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | ... | 45
2253 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1073


  Reply # 1530091 11-Apr-2016 14:57
One person supports this post
Send private message

networkn:

 

 

 

Right, but those politicians are voted in by their constituents, based on the policies they offer at the time of electioneering. If a politician is strongly in favour of a particular stance on drugs, I may or not vote for them depending on what else they are offering in terms of views.

 

In theory, if the system is working properly, the people in parliament should be doing what the majority of people who voted for them, want.

 

 

Our system is based on Party politics, and that was cemented in place with MMP. So, in practice, you get to vote for a package of policies, some of which you you like, and possibly some which you don't like. So the majority of people who voted for a Party may not even like that party's stance on a particular issue. Whether an individual politician is strongly in favour of a particular position is pretty much irrelevant.

 

I suggest that the people in parliament don't particularly know nor care what the majority want. In theory, there could be referenda on significant issues. In practice, when citzen-initiated referenda were introduced, they were made non-binding, because it's much better to get on with doing whatever they want to do than having to do what their constituents want.

 

 


11647 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2003

Trusted

  Reply # 1530105 11-Apr-2016 15:34
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Wow. My posts must be having some good effect if they are arousing so much passion in my critics. For the record, yes, I did mean politicians, as in those who sit in Parliament. As has been pointed out, they are elected to represent us and part of that process is our right and duty to lobby them about the issues we find important. Democracy is not casting your vote and going away for three years to let them get on with it. Democracy is about monitoring your representatives, informing them, and expressing your disagreement when you don’t like the direction they are going in. That is why we have select committees, amongst other things.

 

I withdrew from the firm captain thread because I didn’t want to inflame things further but I do think there is an effort underway to silence me and I think those engaged in it are guilty of precisely the things they accuse me of. They are trying to undermine my arguments and intimidate me by sticking labels on me and by accusing me of things like trolling. That is merely a tactic. It has no substance. In any case, a troll is one who makes outrageous statements purely to evoke a response. As it happens, I believe in the opinions I express. Some of them, such as those relating to drug decriminalisation and copyright, I believe in strongly and I am prepared to defend them strongly. Because those who disagree with me cannot produce better arguments, they are now resorting to the labelling they accuse me of. But calling me a troll is tantamount to questioning my sincerity, and I find that unfortunate. I can assure everyone that I am utterly sincere.

 

This will be my last statement on this subject unless I am forced to respond to other unfounded accusations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

You have it all wrong. No one here has an issue with anyone disagreeing. It is your labelling, not ours. I used the word labelling early on, now you repeat that over and over here right now. The many critics you mention do not likek the ongoing criticism that you level to everything, then when soemone disagrees you tell them io get head out of sand etc  etc etc. Many here dislike that aggressive and "I am right" attitude. Its like me saying, I think NZ is too cold, and anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot. 

 

 

 

Take this thread. Your thread, its devoid of such antics, and its good. But don't turn it around and make out like we all are ganging up. Your OTT posts have been feeding this, not ours. Agreeing or disagreeing has nothing to do with it, well, not from our end anyway.

 

 

 

Take this

 

" I am prepared to defend them strongly. Because those who disagree with me cannot produce better arguments"

 

Now, look at it this way. You have stated categorically that anybne who doesn't agree with you cannot proudce a better arguments. Hiow can you say that, as your belief

 

will off couse not agree. This is the problem. One says A, one say B. Both opinions, but your right and we are wrong

 

 

 

I do beleive that you are sincere, but not able to look at things from both sides, blinkers on. hard for anybody to fight that instinct though


 
 
 
 


Try Wrike: fast, easy, and efficient project collaboration software


6869 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3220

Subscriber

  Reply # 1530114 11-Apr-2016 16:01
Send private message

I think we should take this somewhere else, preferably PM. It is becoming about me, not the subjects that deserve exploration. What I said, or at least meant, is that I do not believe better arguments (than mine) have been presented so far so people are trying to attack me in other ways. That is my opinion about that matter. Of course your opinion will be different. If you wish to continue this elsewhere, maybe start a thread about opinion vs fact, or debating techniques, I will respond there but don't make it only about me.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


11647 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2003

Trusted

  Reply # 1530116 11-Apr-2016 16:14
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

I think we should take this somewhere else, preferably PM. It is becoming about me, not the subjects that deserve exploration. What I said, or at least meant, is that I do not believe better arguments (than mine) have been presented so far so people are trying to attack me in other ways. That is my opinion about that matter. Of course your opinion will be different. If you wish to continue this elsewhere, maybe start a thread about opinion vs fact, or debating techniques, I will respond there but don't make it only about me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I give up, as others have. Your always right, your are facts we are opinions and so on. Attack? Well, there you go. I try to explain whats happening but its attacks back, or more to the point, justifcation. Everything can and will be justified I get it now. But I made an effort to explain matters, so we can all move in with a we can agree to disagree, but that was a waste of time so I won't bother any more. I won't be participating in any more one way traffic, anti establishment threads


2435 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 652


  Reply # 1530117 11-Apr-2016 16:15
Send private message

I was the one who called 'Troll'... but only in a politically thread you started with the exact opposite opinion of the title you presented , and after seeing your name as thread starter on the top three (controversial) threads on the trending column of the GZ live page.

 

If you state your opinions up front, defend them righteously, and be prepared to change them (or acknowledge differing opinions as equally relevant/valid) and you'll get a much better response here.

 

 

 

I'm also one to "call a spade a spade" but I try very hard not to offend when doing so, and to acknowledge that not all might agree with my perspective either...




6869 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3220

Subscriber

  Reply # 1530121 11-Apr-2016 16:31
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

 

 

I give up, as others have. Your always right, your are facts we are opinions and so on. Attack? Well, there you go. I try to explain whats happening but its attacks back, or more to the point, justifcation. Everything can and will be justified I get it now. But I made an effort to explain matters, so we can all move in with a we can agree to disagree, but that was a waste of time so I won't bother any more. I won't be participating in any more one way traffic, anti establishment threads

 

 

Point of information: It wasn't me who ever made any head in the sand comment. That was Frankv, on page 8. It took me awhile to find it. You are so obsessed with my 'bad attitude' that you are heaping anything and everything you can find on me, whether I have anything to to do with it or not. I suggest you take a deep breath and calm down.

 

 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 




6869 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3220

Subscriber

  Reply # 1530129 11-Apr-2016 16:44
Send private message

PhantomNVD:

 

I was the one who called 'Troll'... but only in a politically thread you started with the exact opposite opinion of the title you presented , and after seeing your name as thread starter on the top three (controversial) threads on the trending column of the GZ live page.

 

If you state your opinions up front, defend them righteously, and be prepared to change them (or acknowledge differing opinions as equally relevant/valid) and you'll get a much better response here.

 

 

 

I'm also one to "call a spade a spade" but I try very hard not to offend when doing so, and to acknowledge that not all might agree with my perspective either...

 

 

At the very beginning of that thread and again later I said I was not advocating that position, just posing the question. I thought it was an interesting matter to ponder. I didn't see anything wrong with it then and I don't now. Just because I happen to have three active threads running at the same time does not mean I'm 'trolling' or craving attention. I have been a member of this forum since 2007 and nothing like this has ever come up before. I do not see what the issue is here.

 

Apart from that, I am perfectly willing to change my opinion on anything if someone presents me with a convincing argument to do so. In fact, this has happened in the past. Can we now please return this thread to the important subject it is supposed to be discussing?

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


11647 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2003

Trusted

  Reply # 1530142 11-Apr-2016 17:54
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

tdgeek:

 

 

 

I give up, as others have. Your always right, your are facts we are opinions and so on. Attack? Well, there you go. I try to explain whats happening but its attacks back, or more to the point, justifcation. Everything can and will be justified I get it now. But I made an effort to explain matters, so we can all move in with a we can agree to disagree, but that was a waste of time so I won't bother any more. I won't be participating in any more one way traffic, anti establishment threads

 

 

Point of information: It wasn't me who ever made any head in the sand comment. That was Frankv, on page 8. It took me awhile to find it. You are so obsessed with my 'bad attitude' that you are heaping anything and everything you can find on me, whether I have anything to to do with it or not. I suggest you take a deep breath and calm down.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I know that comment wasn't yours, I meant to state like, but no worry. Many many examples if I chose to re read, which I wont be doing. No, I don't need a deep breath or to calm down. Just was trying to explain why many here state what they do, explain. Saying what others have said, and others think, quite simple. I will stick to real comments forthwith, and from others only. Done and sorted 




6869 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3220

Subscriber

  Reply # 1530147 11-Apr-2016 18:07
Send private message

Let others speak for themselves. I will answer them as I have you. Peace.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


BDFL - Memuneh
60043 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11126

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1530159 11-Apr-2016 18:41
5 people support this post
Send private message

Could you guys just let it go? I don't mind you discuss opposing views, but this is now about pointing out about traits not opinions.

 

So you let this go now. I am getting very close to start sending banhammers your way.







6869 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3220

Subscriber

  Reply # 1530185 11-Apr-2016 19:20
Send private message

I have been trying to let it go for quite awhile now. Í am finished with this discussion (not the drug topic) regardless of what anyone else says.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


gzt

9600 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1407


  Reply # 1530206 11-Apr-2016 20:17
Send private message

A Kaitaia GP says it's time for a change:

Lance O'Sullivan, NZHerald: New Zealand's heavy-handed approach over the past 40 years has done little to address the serious health and social harms caused by problematic drug use. It's only made the problem worse, especially for Māori.

New Zealand is now counted among countries with the highest rates of drug use. We have failed to invest properly in the health of our people, with the government spending more on drug law enforcement and punishment instead of timely prevention, good education and quality treatment.



6869 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3220

Subscriber

  Reply # 1530282 11-Apr-2016 21:45
Send private message

This is very interesting and closely echoes what I believe. I think it shows a growing trend that will only continue to gain momentum. But it is also interesting to read the comments. They are a lot like the comments on this thread. Some are strongly opposed, regardless of what any studies indicate. Others are in favour. There is still a long way to go in the area of public opinion. Something like this will not happen overnight, though every small step gives hope.

 

 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 




6869 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3220

Subscriber

  Reply # 1530854 12-Apr-2016 14:53
One person supports this post
Send private message

In regard to the continuing debate about the consequences of making drugs illegal, I find an article in today's papers revealing. Apparently, a new worldwide study into LSD indicates that it could be a valuable medicine in the treatment of mental illness. That is not yet conclusive, and more work needs to be carried out. What I find so telling, though, is this quote regarding a University of Auckland researcher who participated in the study: "He said LSD was studied extensively in the 1950s and 60s, but there had been almost zero research since it was made illegal."

 

So a potential medicine that possibly could have helped relieve the suffering of millions of ill people and those around them over the past 50 years remained untested and untried because a few wowsers were frightened of young people seeing pretty colours and dropping out of school.

 

The first response to this thread was 'Drugs are bad. The end.' That is a fairly unnuanced view and the evidence is mounting that it is just plain wrong. It has been suggested that I am unwilling to modify my opinions regardless of the evidence presented to me. I wonder if others here may prove to be more malleable in that regard.

 

 

 

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/301273/lsd-could-one-day-treat-mental-illness

 

 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


16508 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4609

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1530886 12-Apr-2016 16:02
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

In regard to the continuing debate about the consequences of making drugs illegal, I find an article in today's papers revealing. Apparently, a new worldwide study into LSD indicates that it could be a valuable medicine in the treatment of mental illness. That is not yet conclusive, and more work needs to be carried out. What I find so telling, though, is this quote regarding a University of Auckland researcher who participated in the study: "He said LSD was studied extensively in the 1950s and 60s, but there had been almost zero research since it was made illegal."

 

So a potential medicine that possibly could have helped relieve the suffering of millions of ill people and those around them over the past 50 years remained untested and untried because a few wowsers were frightened of young people seeing pretty colours and dropping out of school.

 

The first response to this thread was 'Drugs are bad. The end.' That is a fairly unnuanced view and the evidence is mounting that it is just plain wrong. It has been suggested that I am unwilling to modify my opinions regardless of the evidence presented to me. I wonder if others here may prove to be more malleable in that regard.

 

 

 

http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/301273/lsd-could-one-day-treat-mental-illness

 

 

 

 

 

 

Err, so basically if someone suggests it MIGHT have benefit, we are going to retrospectively trash the decision to make it illegal, and make strawman conclusions about the "thousands" of people, it MIGHT have helped? 

 

How about we wait, see if it actually DOES help, properly, and finalize the results before drawing conclusions. You are pretty much treating it as fact already.

 

 


1 | ... | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | ... | 45
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

TCF and Telcos Toughen Up on Scam Callers
Posted 23-Apr-2018 09:39


Amazon launches the International Shopping Experience in the Amazon Shopping App
Posted 19-Apr-2018 08:38


Spark New Zealand and TVNZ to bring coverage of Rugby World Cup 2019
Posted 16-Apr-2018 06:55


How Google can seize Microsoft Office crown
Posted 14-Apr-2018 11:08


How back office transformation drives IRD efficiency
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:15


iPod laws in a smartphone world: will we ever get copyright right?
Posted 12-Apr-2018 21:13


Lightbox service using big data and analytics to learn more about customers
Posted 9-Apr-2018 12:11


111 mobile caller location extended to iOS
Posted 6-Apr-2018 13:50


Huawei announces the HUAWEI P20 series
Posted 29-Mar-2018 11:41


Symantec Internet Security Threat Report shows increased endpoint technology risks
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:29


Spark switches on long-range IoT network across New Zealand
Posted 26-Mar-2018 18:22


Stuff Pix enters streaming video market
Posted 21-Mar-2018 09:18


Windows no longer Microsoft’s main focus
Posted 13-Mar-2018 07:47


Why phone makers are obsessed with cameras
Posted 11-Mar-2018 12:25


New Zealand Adopts International Open Data Charter
Posted 3-Mar-2018 12:48



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.