Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45
13583 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6366

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1717032 8-Feb-2017 09:51
Send private message

freitasm:

 

 

 

 

 

 

That was profound tongue-out





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


BDFL - Memuneh
61784 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 12437

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1717035 8-Feb-2017 09:54
One person supports this post
Send private message
 
 
 
 


13583 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6366

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1717037 8-Feb-2017 09:56
Send private message

freitasm:

 

Enable Javascript and you might see a Tweet there. Basically government relaxing rules for medical use of marijuana - RNZ.

 

 

 

 

*shudder* I'll pass.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


5294 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2147


  Reply # 1717040 8-Feb-2017 09:57
One person supports this post
Send private message

JimmyH: Ultimately, I think the bar for harm to others has to be set quite high to ban something for adults. I tend to think that the default should be that adults can make their own decisions about what they do to themselves, and there should be a pretty overwhelming case for serious harm to others before the government takes that freedom away.

 

I don't objectively care if you enjoy tobacco and are prepared to risk cancer. I do care if you enjoy meth and have a material probability of killing me or someone else in a psychotic rage. Hence how I got to the position above.



 

I find this quite a difficult issue in NZ. 

 

We socialise the costs of accidents and illness to a high extent, so risk taking behaviour impacts everyone via tax rates and ACC levies.  With ACC to some extent this can be managed via different rates for different activities.

 

i.e there is a direct public interest in minimising risky behaviour.

 

 





Mike



Glurp
8696 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3995

Subscriber

  Reply # 1717085 8-Feb-2017 10:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

freitasm:

 

Enable Javascript and you might see a Tweet there. Basically government relaxing rules for medical use of marijuana - RNZ.

 

 

I also get a blank page with javascript enabled on two different browsers. However, I am familiar with the story from another source. Hopefully it is a sign that there will finally start to be some movement on this issue.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1759 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 900


  Reply # 1717113 8-Feb-2017 11:01
Send private message

It still seems pathetic that the Ministry of Health has to sign off on medical cannabis for seriously ill patients...WTF. It is far less potent that opium based medicines that GP's can sign for yet Cannabis has less side effects for seriously ill patients. I guess the Government is saying it has no trust in the GP's or Specialists!!! 

 

and

 

It will still cost the patient more than purchasing it illegally.

 

 


13583 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6366

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1717117 8-Feb-2017 11:10
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

It still seems pathetic that the Ministry of Health has to sign off on medical cannabis for seriously ill patients...WTF. It is far less potent that opium based medicines that GP's can sign for yet Cannabis has less side effects for seriously ill patients. I guess the Government is saying it has no trust in the GP's or Specialists!!! 

 

and

 

It will still cost the patient more than purchasing it illegally.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is not unusual, I have two medications that require MOH approval that has to be done every six months.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


1759 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 900


  Reply # 1717121 8-Feb-2017 11:13
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

Pumpedd:

 

It still seems pathetic that the Ministry of Health has to sign off on medical cannabis for seriously ill patients...WTF. It is far less potent that opium based medicines that GP's can sign for yet Cannabis has less side effects for seriously ill patients. I guess the Government is saying it has no trust in the GP's or Specialists!!! 

 

and

 

It will still cost the patient more than purchasing it illegally.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is not unusual, I have two medications that require MOH approval that has to be done every six months.

 

 

 

 

I too have a drug that requires MoH approval, but at least the GP can prescribe it. Most MoH approvals are based on cost as they dont trust GP's not to over prescribe. This isnt a cost issue as the patient has to pay full costs of the drug.




Glurp
8696 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3995

Subscriber

  Reply # 1717137 8-Feb-2017 11:43
One person supports this post
Send private message

Official attitudes towards marijuana have been hysterically disproportionate since the days of Reefer Madness in the 1930s. This is a small step in the right direction, but at least it is a step.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


5294 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2147


  Reply # 1717142 8-Feb-2017 12:02
Send private message

I do think it is time for medical cannabis extract to be able to be prescribed. 

 

Could (initially at least) be treated the same as ADHD meds which requires annual assessment by a specialist, GP prescribes and as it's a restricted med the script is faxed direct to the pharmacy and there is a delayed pickup.  If the patient is in hospital then the specialist could prescribe and the hospital issue.

 

If someone is seriously ill they will be seeing a specialist anyway.





Mike

1759 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 900


  Reply # 1717154 8-Feb-2017 12:29
One person supports this post
Send private message

MikeAqua:

 

I do think it is time for medical cannabis extract to be able to be prescribed. 

 

Could (initially at least) be treated the same as ADHD meds which requires annual assessment by a specialist, GP prescribes and as it's a restricted med the script is faxed direct to the pharmacy and there is a delayed pickup.  If the patient is in hospital then the specialist could prescribe and the hospital issue.

 

If someone is seriously ill they will be seeing a specialist anyway.

 

 

Yes, its usually for the seriously ill or where pain/discomfort cannot be treated conventionally due to immunity or nasty side effects. I see no need for the government to be involved at all other than safety/guideline issues. Overuse of paracetamol can be lethal whereas overuse of cannabis extract is not lethal.


1531 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 218


  Reply # 1717324 8-Feb-2017 18:19
Send private message

Good thing imho.
The loosening I mean.

6276 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1949

Trusted

  Reply # 1717330 8-Feb-2017 18:40
Send private message

This is great news.

 

I hope the option is given to patients INITIALLY. Where they can opt for a Natural pain relief rather than a vicious drug with possible side affects. Because, At the end of the day the worst that can happen is you get stonned ^ and it doesn't relieve pain. Would you rather that or 5 years of drugs not working then trying it to find it works. 

 


I dont believe in treating people as guinea pigs with drugs trying to find what works. Not saying that Medical cannabis is a cure to all but rather they should be testing the natural methods before harsh drugs.
I had a family member here with cancer, He was in inhumane amounts of pain for years and there would be some new drug every 6 months we would try. All it did was cause another side affect or worsen the situation.

 

The best 'new drug' we found was cookies, cant really put it into words the difference it made but you would have to experience it as a family to understand. Step in the correct direction.

 

 ^ (If it contains THC, But medical extract is CBD without the THC component so nothing would happen)





 


1759 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 900


  Reply # 1717358 8-Feb-2017 19:35
Send private message

TimA:

 

This is great news.

 

I hope the option is given to patients INITIALLY. Where they can opt for a Natural pain relief rather than a vicious drug with possible side affects. Because, At the end of the day the worst that can happen is you get stonned ^ and it doesn't relieve pain. Would you rather that or 5 years of drugs not working then trying it to find it works. 

 


I dont believe in treating people as guinea pigs with drugs trying to find what works. Not saying that Medical cannabis is a cure to all but rather they should be testing the natural methods before harsh drugs.
I had a family member here with cancer, He was in inhumane amounts of pain for years and there would be some new drug every 6 months we would try. All it did was cause another side affect or worsen the situation.

 

The best 'new drug' we found was cookies, cant really put it into words the difference it made but you would have to experience it as a family to understand. Step in the correct direction.

 

 ^ (If it contains THC, But medical extract is CBD without the THC component so nothing would happen)

 

 

I dont believe you get high as such from Sativex. Even so most people cannot afford it as it costs $3k just to import it each time plus the thousands the drug costs. It is still crazy that the patient needs to go to a GP...the to a specialist...then the MoH decides. In my mind the Government did nothing today. If Pharmac decide to supply then that would be something.

 

But to still treat this drug as something more difficult to get than opium based drugs is plain stupid. Even more stupid to take the decision away from the patients medical teams.




Glurp
8696 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3995

Subscriber

  Reply # 1719852 14-Feb-2017 09:39
Send private message

Not sure what to make of this but an item on Voxy indicates that Peter Dunne is being taken to court for violation of cannabis laws!

 

http://www.voxy.co.nz/politics/5/274911

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1 | ... | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Geekzone Live »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.