Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | ... | 733
Glurp
9524 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4522

Subscriber

  Reply # 1670838 14-Nov-2016 15:43
Send private message quote this post

frankv:

 

 

 

Actually, his well-documented utterance wasn't that he thought it was fine to grope the genitals of women. What he actually said was "And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." This doesn't say anything about whether he thinks it's fine... just that some women are so star-struck that they will allow anything.

 

 

I don't want to get mired in arguments about minutiae, but I think there is a case for implied approval here.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


Awesome
4841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1096

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1670844 14-Nov-2016 15:56
Send private message quote this post

shk292:

 

 

 

Just to clarify - are you referring to the lefties who are protesting in the streets of NZ and burning USA flags here?  Or some other group?  Just that the former don't tend to hide under rocks

 

 

Some tweets from the Trump himself from 2012 when Obama won a second term http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-2012-election-tweetstorm-resurfaces-popular-electoral/story?id=43431536

 

"The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy."
"We can't let this happen. We should march on Washington and stop this travesty. Our nation is totally divided!"
"Lets fight like hell and stop this great and disgusting injustice! The world is laughing at us."
"This election is a total sham and a travesty. We are not a democracy!"

 

The very same "sham", "travesty" and "disaster" he described in 2012 just handed him the presidency, despite losing the popular vote (Even Obama won that both times). But will he now push for change to the system to fix the very problems he highlighted, which would delegitimise his win? Don't think so.

 

And that's all you really need to know about the guy.





Twitter: ajobbins


 
 
 
 


Awesome
4841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1096

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1670853 14-Nov-2016 16:08
Send private message quote this post

And to add to the above, Trump tweeted last week "Just had a very open and successful presidential election. Now professional protesters, incited by the media, are protesting. Very unfair!"

 

He's calling unfair the very thing he was suggesting in 2012 when he tweeted "We should march on Washington and stop this travesty".





Twitter: ajobbins


7998 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4338


  Reply # 1670855 14-Nov-2016 16:19
Send private message quote this post

ajobbins:

 

And to add to the above, Trump tweeted last week "Just had a very open and successful presidential election. Now professional protesters, incited by the media, are protesting. Very unfair!"

 

He's calling unfair the very thing he was suggesting in 2012 when he tweeted "We should march on Washington and stop this travesty".

 

 

 

 

I think he realised the hypocrisy - or someone close to him pointed it out.  Next day he tweeted:

 

"Love the fact that the small groups of protesters last night have passion for our great country. We will all come together and be proud!"

 

 


4700 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2646

Trusted

  Reply # 1670856 14-Nov-2016 16:19
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Don't forget that it was only gonna be unfair and rigged if he lost!


JWR

751 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 238


  Reply # 1670859 14-Nov-2016 16:25
One person supports this post
quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

Geektastic:

 

Is it likely to produce more general happiness if we force them not to do that because we think they should not do it or if we create places where they can lead their lives the way they want to? Which will lead to a more peaceful society? For example, Indian reservations in the US or Israel are places where this kind of approach has already been taken.

 

 

I believe in right and wrong. I believe these are absolutes, not shades of. The confinement of American Indians to reservations was an obscenity, one of the big lies upon which America is built. The position of the Palestinians is similar and is probably directly and indirectly responsible for the tens of thousands of murders that have taken place in the Middle East. Israel is not a happy place, for almost anyone living there. Unemployment, poverty and drunkenness are the main defining characteristics of reservation life. Whose happiness is being looked after here? 

 

A slave-owner allowed to keep his plantations and human propterty may well be happier, but that doesn't make it right. A society that is fair to all may make those who don't believe in equal opportunity for everyone unhappy, but for me that is no reason at all to go in that direction.

 

 

 

 

I disagree with the idea of absolutes in right and wrong.

 

I do agree that there are things that almost everyone would agree are wrong/bad or right/good.

 

But, the World is far, far more grey than it is black and white.

 

If fact, I think it is dangerous to oversimplify things like this.

 

A lot of injustice and oppression starts with this type of thinking.


Glurp
9524 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4522

Subscriber

  Reply # 1670865 14-Nov-2016 16:30
Send private message quote this post

Fair enough but I respectfully disagree. Some things you just have to stand for.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


2681 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1295

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1670870 14-Nov-2016 16:58
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

frankv:

 

 

 

Actually, his well-documented utterance wasn't that he thought it was fine to grope the genitals of women. What he actually said was "And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything ... Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." This doesn't say anything about whether he thinks it's fine... just that some women are so star-struck that they will allow anything.

 

 

I don't want to get mired in arguments about minutiae, but I think there is a case for implied approval here.

 

 

Yeah, I'm happy to let it drop. The (probably) last thing I'll say is...

 

You did say "My visceral dislike of Trump is based entirely on what I have seen him say and do." and then went on to use something he did NOT say "that he thought it was fine to grope the genitals of women" as an example. Instead, it's based (in part) on the "implied approval" *you* have inferred from his words. As I hope everyone here knows, I'm no Trump fan. But IMHO you do need to base your visceral dislike on things he actually said.

 

While I'm at it, I'll also reply to this:

 

Fred99:

 

 

Oh yeah that's right.  Bad enough for Billy Bush to be suspended and then resigning for standing alongside as he was saying it, but not so bad that the President Elect of the USA brushes it off as "locker room talk" - the kind of thing we all say, apparently. 

 

 

I don't know *why* Billy Bush was suspended and then resigned. Do you? It could be because he released the recording. But could it have been because he didn't allow his employer to make as much out of this money-spinner of a recording secret?  Or maybe he was bonking the editor's wife? Maybe he just wasn't bringing in the ratings, so he got a golden handshake? Maybe it was pressure from Trump himself, or some insider in the Republican Party, or Hillary Clinton, or some insider in the Democrat Party. Maybe he was just collateral damage in the media beatup of the whole thing.

 

The presence of groupies around rock groups is an example of exactly the same thing... sex of any kind is available on demand from strangers for famous people. I heard Robbie Williams say essentially the same thing, complete with anecdotal example, on a TV chat show a week or two ago. I've had "locker room" discussions on this subject before (although not in locker rooms)... I guess I'm just fortunate or clever or insignificant enough not to have been recorded saying it, and that no-one cares anyway. I don't understand the motivation of the groupies, but it's undeniable that they exist. I view that with incredulity, so maybe *I* heard an overtone of incredulity in Trump's voice as he was explaining essentially the same thing to the DJ.

 

And I'm somewhat incredulous that the whole thing blew up into such a media feeding frenzy of moral outrage, and that a whole group of people took *this* as a rallying cry against Trump.

 

 

 


Glurp
9524 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4522

Subscriber

  Reply # 1670876 14-Nov-2016 17:40
Send private message quote this post

Applause. You make good points and I am happy to concede them. I agree that I was sloppy about that example, but I still think Trump is a rotten human being. Even if he didn't actually say that, he also did not go out of his way to condemn it. But okay, what are some other things that have brought about my visceral dislike? I guess I could mention his coyness about his tax returns, or his apparently fraudulent actions with Trump University. What about his many proven lies (I can't cite them all here but the fact-checking sites have them) against his opponents during the campaigns? Apparently he is now backing off many of his more outrageous campaign promises, like his much-vaunted wall and deporations. Are those more lies or just excusable hyperbole? I found his lack of respect for the democratic institutions (unwillingness to accept the election results if they went against him) alarming. There are many other things, and if I am forced to, I am prepared to look them up and document them, but the bottom line is that he is an unpleasant and possibly dangerous person and I don't like him. I would like to emphasise that I don't like him because I find him unlikeable, not because of his politics as such. I preferred Barack Obama as President at the time, but I would have had no problem accepting John McCain (though Sarah Palin is another matter). Also not Mitt Romney. All of these people have their drawbacks, but I would not qualify them as rotten human beings. Donald Trump I would.

 

My moral outrage is not dependent on the pussy video. There is plenty more to be outraged about.





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1631 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 859


  Reply # 1670878 14-Nov-2016 17:43
Send private message quote this post

ajobbins:

 

And to add to the above, Trump tweeted last week "Just had a very open and successful presidential election. Now professional protesters, incited by the media, are protesting. Very unfair!"

 

He's calling unfair the very thing he was suggesting in 2012 when he tweeted "We should march on Washington and stop this travesty".

 

 

I can imagine the headline "Politician in change of mind scandal" - because that has never happened before, has it?

 

Don't get me wrong, I don't like him - I've said elsewhere that I think he's an idiot.  But he is a product of the USA's democratic system, and I think democracy should be respected, even if it sometimes produces the "wrong" (for a given value of "wrong") result.  It's just that some groups tend to protest more loudly when it doesn't go their way - the same applied to Brexit quite recently.  And I'm totally against flag burning, book burning, car burning or effigy burning of any sort, especially as a demonstration against a democratic result.


BDFL - Memuneh
62692 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 13381

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1670879 14-Nov-2016 17:50
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

 

ajobbins:

 

And to add to the above, Trump tweeted last week "Just had a very open and successful presidential election. Now professional protesters, incited by the media, are protesting. Very unfair!"

 

He's calling unfair the very thing he was suggesting in 2012 when he tweeted "We should march on Washington and stop this travesty".

 

 

I think he realised the hypocrisy - or someone close to him pointed it out.  Next day he tweeted:

 

"Love the fact that the small groups of protesters last night have passion for our great country. We will all come together and be proud!"

 

 

This is another big deal... Does he need someone to tug his sleeve every time he says something stupid and then has to retract? Just shows what they elected...





Glurp
9524 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4522

Subscriber

  Reply # 1670881 14-Nov-2016 18:00
Send private message quote this post

shk292:

 

 

 

I can imagine the headline "Politician in change of mind scandal" - because that has never happened before, has it?

 

Don't get me wrong, I don't like him - I've said elsewhere that I think he's an idiot.  But he is a product of the USA's democratic system, and I think democracy should be respected, even if it sometimes produces the "wrong" (for a given value of "wrong") result.  It's just that some groups tend to protest more loudly when it doesn't go their way - the same applied to Brexit quite recently.  And I'm totally against flag burning, book burning, car burning or effigy burning of any sort, especially as a demonstration against a democratic result.

 

 

I agree with you on this. I also don't see the point of violence or burning things as a form of protest. I also don't think that those who do this are representive of any serious political grouping and I get a little tired of those who mindlessly toss labels like 'leftist' around.

 

Trump did win legimately, no question about that, and those who allowed him to should get what they deserve. Maybe it will be a useful object lesson. The election result must be respected. I am apprehensive, because that unmentionable Austrian also achieved power by democratic means, and I don't trust Trump to respect the rules once he is in power because he has shown no respect for them up to now. But I will hope for the best. What other choice do we have?

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


12562 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4157

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1670904 14-Nov-2016 18:40
Send private message quote this post

JWR:

Rikkitic:


Geektastic:


Is it likely to produce more general happiness if we force them not to do that because we think they should not do it or if we create places where they can lead their lives the way they want to? Which will lead to a more peaceful society? For example, Indian reservations in the US or Israel are places where this kind of approach has already been taken.



I believe in right and wrong. I believe these are absolutes, not shades of. The confinement of American Indians to reservations was an obscenity, one of the big lies upon which America is built. The position of the Palestinians is similar and is probably directly and indirectly responsible for the tens of thousands of murders that have taken place in the Middle East. Israel is not a happy place, for almost anyone living there. Unemployment, poverty and drunkenness are the main defining characteristics of reservation life. Whose happiness is being looked after here? 


A slave-owner allowed to keep his plantations and human propterty may well be happier, but that doesn't make it right. A society that is fair to all may make those who don't believe in equal opportunity for everyone unhappy, but for me that is no reason at all to go in that direction.


 



I disagree with the idea of absolutes in right and wrong.


I do agree that there are things that almost everyone would agree are wrong/bad or right/good.


But, the World is far, far more grey than it is black and white.


If fact, I think it is dangerous to oversimplify things like this.


A lot of injustice and oppression starts with this type of thinking.



Also history is rife with things that were wrong and are now right and vice versa.

Things change as do morals.





19554 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5876

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1670908 14-Nov-2016 18:47
Send private message quote this post

It has occurred to me that what I considered a remarkably unlikely event could potentially come to pass, making my objections to those against gun control look .. wrong. 

 

A lot of people who believe in the right to bear arms (of any type) do so because they want protection not against burglars or such, but from a potential attack by the Government. There is the potential for the violence and protests to go from what it is now, to a major (much more major) thing, which causes the Government to step in (right or wrongly) and then the situation has played itself out

 

as the fear mongers have predicted. 

 

Unthinkable just a matter of weeks ago (to me), it's now seeming potentially possible (though still very unlikely).

 

 


2509 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 687


  Reply # 1670956 14-Nov-2016 19:30
Send private message quote this post

For all the Trump bashers out there, 50 year old warning:

https://youtu.be/_se8c-wN35M

But is that really him?

1 | ... | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | ... | 733
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic


Donate via Givealittle


Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Amazon introduces new Kindle with adjustable front light
Posted 21-Mar-2019 20:14


A call from the companies providing internet access for the great majority of New Zealanders, to the companies with the greatest influence over social media content
Posted 19-Mar-2019 15:21


Two e-scooter companies selected for Wellington trial
Posted 15-Mar-2019 17:33


GeForce GTX 1660 available now
Posted 15-Mar-2019 08:47


Artificial Intelligence to double the rate of innovation in New Zealand by 2021
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:47


LG demonstrates smart home concepts at LG InnoFest
Posted 13-Mar-2019 14:45


New Zealanders buying more expensive smartphones
Posted 11-Mar-2019 09:52


2degrees Offers Amazon Prime Video to Broadband Customers
Posted 8-Mar-2019 14:10


D-Link ANZ launches D-Fend AC2600 Wi-Fi Router Protected by McAfee
Posted 7-Mar-2019 11:09


Slingshot commissions celebrities to design new modems
Posted 5-Mar-2019 08:58


Symantec Annual Threat Report reveals more ambitious, destructive and stealthy attacks
Posted 28-Feb-2019 10:14


FUJIFILM launches high performing X-T30
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:40


Netflix is killing content piracy says research
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:33


Trend Micro finds shifting threats require kiwis to rethink security priorities
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:27


Mainfreight uses Spark IoT Asset Tracking service
Posted 28-Feb-2019 09:25



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.