Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
To post in this sub-forum you must have made 100 posts or have Trust status or have completed our ID Verification



Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
Affiliate link
 
 
 

Affiliate link: Find your next Lenovo laptop, desktop, workstation or tablet now.
Dratsab
3803 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1722537 19-Feb-2017 09:36
Send private message

Rikkitic:

Dratsab:


Rikkitic: Most recently he emphasised there was no prospect whatsoever of any softening of marijuana laws. This in response to a question about the change regarding medical marijuana approvals. 


That's because he's not willing to conflate marijuana laws which are aimed at curbing the use/abuse of an illicit substance and medical cannabis extracts.



This issue and all related ones has been thoroughly thrashed out on the drugs thread.


 


As MikeB4 says, you're the one who brought this subject up on the first place. Now you object to it. My response was directly related to what you said.

Rikkitic

Awrrr
15467 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1722556 19-Feb-2017 10:33
Send private message

This is just silly. If the two of you have such a need to attack me, at least find something substantive to do it with. My reference to cannabis in my original post was in passing. The post was about Peter Dunne and MMP, not the drug laws. There is another thread for that and I pointed it out. Enough said.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


MikeB4
17077 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1722628 19-Feb-2017 12:53
Send private message

Rikkitic:

This is just silly. If the two of you have such a need to attack me, at least find something substantive to do it with. My reference to cannabis in my original post was in passing. The post was about Peter Dunne and MMP, not the drug laws. There is another thread for that and I pointed it out. Enough said.


 



Please yourself, you do seem to forget or gloss over thing you post earlier in many threads. We don't need to get your consent as to what to post.

As for drugs in this thread, Mr Dunne is the Associate Minister of health so it's very much on topic.



Rikkitic

Awrrr
15467 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1722633 19-Feb-2017 13:07
Send private message

The reason I made my comment was that I felt the thread was veering off-topic and there was already another thread on the drug subject. It is the privilege of the originator of a thread to lay out what the thread is about. Staying on-topic is a convention that is generally encouraged on Geekzone. 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


gzt

gzt
13578 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1722634 19-Feb-2017 13:13
Send private message

Dunne and his reforms or lack of them are within the scope of the topic. General discussion of policy and war on drugs is best in the other topic imo.

Pumpedd
1759 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1722696 19-Feb-2017 15:45
Send private message

The post was just a trill imo....title says it all.


dickytim
2514 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1722853 20-Feb-2017 06:51
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Pumpedd:

 

Rikkitic:

 

There is a difference between what he says and what he does. Most recently he emphasised there was no prospect whatsoever of any softening of marijuana laws. This in response to a question about the change regarding medical marijuana approvals. He has been in parliament forever. He has been a Minister much of that time. He has been on all sides of the political spectrum. He has had more than time enough to actually do something. It is way past time for a change.  

 

But you are right. I don't like the bow tie either.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

One Associate Minister can't do much( I dont believe he is even in cabinet)....softening marijuana laws would probably be a conscious vote  and it wouldnt have a hope in hell of passing. Not only is National against it so are most of the others. Dunne was probably just preaching the obvious...

 

 

That may be so but he has had long enough. It is time to try someone new.

 

 

 

 

That simple isn't your decision to make, it is his electorate and party voters.

 

I am pleased you are trying to make our minds up for us, but I am more please there is a democratic process in place to stop you Mr Rikkitic Trump.

 

Edited for spelling.




Dratsab
3803 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1722883 20-Feb-2017 09:08
Send private message

Rikkitic:

This is just silly. If the two of you have such a need to attack me, at least find something substantive to do it with. My reference to cannabis in my original post was in passing. The post was about Peter Dunne and MMP, not the drug laws. There is another thread for that and I pointed it out. Enough said.


 


I'd like you to point out exactly where it is that I attacked you?

Rikkitic

Awrrr
15467 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1722904 20-Feb-2017 09:50
Send private message

dickytim:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That simple isn't your decision to make, it is his electorate and party voters.

 

I am pleased you are trying to make our minds up for us, but I am more please there is a democratic process in place to stop you Mr Rikkitic Trump.

 

 

As part of our democratic process I am saying what I think about it and explaining why I think that. 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


MikeB4
17077 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Subscriber

  #1722905 20-Feb-2017 09:54
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

dickytim:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

That simple isn't your decision to make, it is his electorate and party voters.

 

I am pleased you are trying to make our minds up for us, but I am more please there is a democratic process in place to stop you Mr Rikkitic Trump.

 

 

As part of our democratic process I am saying what I think about it and explaining why I think that. 

 

 

 

 

And so are they who take an opposite aspect to you.


Rikkitic

Awrrr
15467 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1722918 20-Feb-2017 10:11
Send private message

Dratsab:

 


I'd like you to point out exactly where it is that I attacked you?

 

This was supposed to be a thread about Peter Dunne. Then it started going in the direction of drug policy. I was willing to discuss both, but I felt they should be kept in their separate threads since there was already a drugs thread. I tried to point this out and then MikeB4 started going on about me trying to change the subject and you chimed in. I was perfectly happy to discuss the matter, I just felt it should be done in the correct thread. GZT had no problem with that, and he and I did carry on in the drugs thread. 

 

Here is your statement: 

 

'As MikeB4 says, you're the one who brought this subject up on the first place. Now you object to it. My response was directly related to what you said.'

 

My objection was that you both kept going off-topic. That was all. First it was about Dunne, then about drugs, then about the fact that I suggested the drugs discussion was better placed in the drugs thread. I wanted to get the topic back to Dunne. Yes, drug policy is also related to that, since he has a role in it and I did bring it up in that context, I just felt the focus was getting moved. That was my perception of it. 

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


Rikkitic

Awrrr
15467 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1722919 20-Feb-2017 10:12
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

And so are they who take an opposite aspect to you.

 

 

I wasn't suggesting anything else.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


Dratsab
3803 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1722953 20-Feb-2017 11:02
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Dratsab: I'd like you to point out exactly where it is that I attacked you?

 

This was supposed to be a thread about Peter Dunne. Then it started going in the direction of drug policy. I was willing to discuss both, but I felt they should be kept in their separate threads since there was already a drugs thread. I tried to point this out and then MikeB4 started going on about me trying to change the subject and you chimed in. I was perfectly happy to discuss the matter, I just felt it should be done in the correct thread. GZT had no problem with that, and he and I did carry on in the drugs thread. 

 

Here is your statement: 

 

'As MikeB4 says, you're the one who brought this subject up on the first place. Now you object to it. My response was directly related to what you said.'

 

My objection was that you both kept going off-topic. That was all. First it was about Dunne, then about drugs, then about the fact that I suggested the drugs discussion was better placed in the drugs thread. I wanted to get the topic back to Dunne. Yes, drug policy is also related to that, since he has a role in it and I did bring it up in that context, I just felt the focus was getting moved. That was my perception of it. 

 

As demonstrated above, you're unable to point out where I attacked you because it simply didn't happen. I have pointed out a factual occurrence, nothing more.

 

As I said before, all I did was respond, pertinently, to a point you raised. If you think the point was off topic, that's because you took it there. You need to learn to accept that people are perfectly entitled to make comments in public forums such as this. Back to Peter Dunne now or do you want to keep dragging out this OT point?


Rikkitic

Awrrr
15467 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1722963 20-Feb-2017 11:12
Send private message

You seem to be the one making this about me but if you have anything meaningful to say on the topic I will do my best to respond.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


Pumpedd
1759 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1722977 20-Feb-2017 11:48
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

You seem to be the one making this about me but if you have anything meaningful to say on the topic I will do my best to respond.

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is not a meaningful topic and it should be closed.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

D-Link G415 4G Smart Router Review
Posted 27-Jun-2022 17:24


New Zealand Video Game Sales Reaches $540 Million
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:49


Github Copilot Generally Available to All Developers
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:37


Logitech G Introduces the New Astro A10 Headset
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:20


Fitbit introduces Sleep Profiles
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:11


Synology Introduces FlashStation FS3410
Posted 26-Jun-2022 14:04


Intel Arc A380 Graphics First Available in China
Posted 15-Jun-2022 17:08


JBL Introduces PartyBox Encore Essential Speaker
Posted 15-Jun-2022 17:05


New TVNZ+ streaming brand launches
Posted 13-Jun-2022 08:35


Chromecast With Google TV Review
Posted 10-Jun-2022 17:10


Xbox Gaming on Your Samsung Smart TV No Console Required
Posted 10-Jun-2022 00:01


Xbox Cloud Gaming Now Available in New Zealand
Posted 10-Jun-2022 00:01


HP Envy Inspire 7900e Review
Posted 9-Jun-2022 20:31


Philips Hue Starter Kit Review
Posted 4-Jun-2022 11:10


Sony Expands Its Wireless Speaker X-series Range
Posted 4-Jun-2022 10:25









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.