Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

gzt

8886 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1186


  Reply # 1841301 8-Aug-2017 16:56
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

gzt: From Onehunga you have to cross the bridge. You might be better off going Airport, Mangere, Otahuhu.

Edit: thread kicked into politics forum lol


 


The subject is an election policy by one party, it's political.


No objection from me.



484 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 41


  Reply # 1841473 8-Aug-2017 21:11
Send private message quote this post

frednz:

 

rb99:

 

Mentioned before previously, but I see no reason why we all shouldn't contribute. Auckland is 4 hours drive away for me, so what. Kaikoura is a lot further away and I'm helping to pay for their roads and railway to be fixed after their recent little seismic events.

 

 

If we all contributed, the tax would certainly raise a lot more money than originally anticipated by Labour's Gurus. But, because a regional fuel tax can't be implemented (as Bill English claims) then don't you think that Labour needs to go back to the drawing board urgently and issue a statement that clarifies the situation? Labour can't simply ignore the research that National has obviously done on this issue.

 

You would think that, if elected, Labour should be able to introduce a regional fuel tax even if it means that new systems need to be designed to implement it. But, in light of the statement by Bill English, Labour needs to explain why National is wrong on this issue (if they are).

 

In any event, I can imagine a lot of people outside Auckland won't vote for a Labour Green Alliance if they think some of their petrol bill is going to pay for Auckland's transport woes! So, Jacinda, get cracking and explain how you're going to do it!

 

 

This morning on the AM show, Jacinda said that she disagreed with National's assertion that a regional fuel tax can't be implemented, but she didn't provide any details about how Labour can do this.


 
 
 
 


8828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1339

Trusted

  Reply # 1841475 8-Aug-2017 21:16
Send private message quote this post

frednz:

 

frednz:

 

rb99:

 

Mentioned before previously, but I see no reason why we all shouldn't contribute. Auckland is 4 hours drive away for me, so what. Kaikoura is a lot further away and I'm helping to pay for their roads and railway to be fixed after their recent little seismic events.

 

 

If we all contributed, the tax would certainly raise a lot more money than originally anticipated by Labour's Gurus. But, because a regional fuel tax can't be implemented (as Bill English claims) then don't you think that Labour needs to go back to the drawing board urgently and issue a statement that clarifies the situation? Labour can't simply ignore the research that National has obviously done on this issue.

 

You would think that, if elected, Labour should be able to introduce a regional fuel tax even if it means that new systems need to be designed to implement it. But, in light of the statement by Bill English, Labour needs to explain why National is wrong on this issue (if they are).

 

In any event, I can imagine a lot of people outside Auckland won't vote for a Labour Green Alliance if they think some of their petrol bill is going to pay for Auckland's transport woes! So, Jacinda, get cracking and explain how you're going to do it!

 

 

This morning on the AM show, Jacinda said that she disagreed with National's assertion that a regional fuel tax can't be implemented, but she didn't provide any details about how Labour can do this.

 

 

What reasons did Bill provide that it cannot be done?


9376 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2829

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1841493 8-Aug-2017 22:16
Send private message quote this post

I'd say the biggest reason is that you'll only score in the areas too far from the boundary to make it worth leaving the taxed area to fill up.

 

You see that in the US where a State borders another that has lower fuel taxes - anyone close enough will cross to the other State to fill up.






8828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1339

Trusted

  Reply # 1841525 9-Aug-2017 06:47
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

I'd say the biggest reason is that you'll only score in the areas too far from the boundary to make it worth leaving the taxed area to fill up.

 

You see that in the US where a State borders another that has lower fuel taxes - anyone close enough will cross to the other State to fill up.

 

 

True, but that doesnt mean it cannot be done. Simply apply a levy in the billing systems of gas stations that are in AKL and surrounds, thats it. The few that decide to waste time and money on the fringes are miniscule. 


8828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1339

Trusted

  Reply # 1841528 9-Aug-2017 07:04
Send private message quote this post

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.


9376 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2829

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1843231 10-Aug-2017 09:17
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?





8828 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1339

Trusted

  Reply # 1843291 10-Aug-2017 09:37
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:
tdgeek:

 

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.

 



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?

 

The infrastructure has not been maintained. It should have been funded annually keeping up to date. So, catching up 10 years of deferred spending cant be funded from one years rates and taxes


584 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 230


  Reply # 1843350 10-Aug-2017 10:26
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

Geektastic:
tdgeek:

 

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.

 



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?

 

The infrastructure has not been maintained. It should have been funded annually keeping up to date. So, catching up 10 years of deferred spending cant be funded from one years rates and taxes

 

 

Too much money being spent on welfare, and probably lots of it lost on walfare fraud too. We need to tighten the reins a bit. We pay way more than enough tax in this country already.


Departed
10544 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4584

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1843360 10-Aug-2017 10:35
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Wiggum:

 

tdgeek:

 

Geektastic:
tdgeek:

 

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.

 



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?

 

The infrastructure has not been maintained. It should have been funded annually keeping up to date. So, catching up 10 years of deferred spending cant be funded from one years rates and taxes

 

 

Too much money being spent on welfare, and probably lots of it lost on walfare fraud too. We need to tighten the reins a bit. We pay way more than enough tax in this country already.

 

 

 

 

Levels of benefit abuse and fraud are very low in NZ on international standards.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


584 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 230


  Reply # 1843365 10-Aug-2017 10:44
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4: Levels of benefit abuse and fraud are very low in NZ on international standards.

 

 

After watching the "Turei effect" on this very subject, I don't think I quiet agree with you.


Departed
10544 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4584

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1843366 10-Aug-2017 10:47
Send private message quote this post

Wiggum:

 

MikeB4: Levels of benefit abuse and fraud are very low in NZ on international standards.

 

 

After watching the "Turei effect" on this very subject, I don't think I quiet agree with you.

 

 

 

 

good grief, you base your ummm errr assessment on one incident, I base my statement on over a quarter of a century's professional involvement.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


5254 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2389

Subscriber

  Reply # 1843368 10-Aug-2017 10:48
Send private message quote this post

Benefit bashing is a national sport here. Harp on Turei all you want, it doesn't change the reality for most people. 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


87 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 24


  Reply # 1843409 10-Aug-2017 11:04
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post
584 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 230


  Reply # 1843457 10-Aug-2017 11:47
Send private message quote this post

gulfa:

 

...

 

 

This has already been discussed and I suggest you go do some research.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Intel introduces new 8th Generation processors
Posted 21-Aug-2017 19:02


Trend Micro launches Home Network Security
Posted 21-Aug-2017 18:38


Avondale College students at top of Microsoft Office Specialist World Championship
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:11


Garmin introduces inReach SE+ and inReach Explorer+
Posted 21-Aug-2017 14:05


Public Wi-Fi plus cloud file sharing
Posted 18-Aug-2017 11:20


D-Link NZ launches professional Wireless AC Wave 2 Access Point for businesses
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:25


Garmin introduces the Rino 700 five-watt two-way handheld radio
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:04


Garmin announces the Foretrex 601 and Foretrex 701 Ballistic Edition for outdoor and tactical use
Posted 17-Aug-2017 19:02


Brightstar announces new distribution partnership with Samsung Knox platform in Australia
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:07


Free gig-enabled WiFi network extends across Dunedin
Posted 17-Aug-2017 17:04


Samsung expands with connect Gear S3 Frontier
Posted 17-Aug-2017 15:55


Fact-checking Southern Cross Next cable is fastest to USA
Posted 17-Aug-2017 13:57


Thurrott says Microsoft Surface is dead last for reliability
Posted 16-Aug-2017 15:19


LibreOffice 5.4 works better with Microsoft Office files
Posted 16-Aug-2017 13:32


Certus launches Cognition
Posted 14-Aug-2017 09:31



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.