Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6

gzt

9070 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1245


  Reply # 1841301 8-Aug-2017 16:56
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

gzt: From Onehunga you have to cross the bridge. You might be better off going Airport, Mangere, Otahuhu.

Edit: thread kicked into politics forum lol


 


The subject is an election policy by one party, it's political.


No objection from me.



565 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 56


  Reply # 1841473 8-Aug-2017 21:11
Send private message quote this post

frednz:

 

rb99:

 

Mentioned before previously, but I see no reason why we all shouldn't contribute. Auckland is 4 hours drive away for me, so what. Kaikoura is a lot further away and I'm helping to pay for their roads and railway to be fixed after their recent little seismic events.

 

 

If we all contributed, the tax would certainly raise a lot more money than originally anticipated by Labour's Gurus. But, because a regional fuel tax can't be implemented (as Bill English claims) then don't you think that Labour needs to go back to the drawing board urgently and issue a statement that clarifies the situation? Labour can't simply ignore the research that National has obviously done on this issue.

 

You would think that, if elected, Labour should be able to introduce a regional fuel tax even if it means that new systems need to be designed to implement it. But, in light of the statement by Bill English, Labour needs to explain why National is wrong on this issue (if they are).

 

In any event, I can imagine a lot of people outside Auckland won't vote for a Labour Green Alliance if they think some of their petrol bill is going to pay for Auckland's transport woes! So, Jacinda, get cracking and explain how you're going to do it!

 

 

This morning on the AM show, Jacinda said that she disagreed with National's assertion that a regional fuel tax can't be implemented, but she didn't provide any details about how Labour can do this.


 
 
 
 


9728 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1505

Trusted

  Reply # 1841475 8-Aug-2017 21:16
Send private message quote this post

frednz:

 

frednz:

 

rb99:

 

Mentioned before previously, but I see no reason why we all shouldn't contribute. Auckland is 4 hours drive away for me, so what. Kaikoura is a lot further away and I'm helping to pay for their roads and railway to be fixed after their recent little seismic events.

 

 

If we all contributed, the tax would certainly raise a lot more money than originally anticipated by Labour's Gurus. But, because a regional fuel tax can't be implemented (as Bill English claims) then don't you think that Labour needs to go back to the drawing board urgently and issue a statement that clarifies the situation? Labour can't simply ignore the research that National has obviously done on this issue.

 

You would think that, if elected, Labour should be able to introduce a regional fuel tax even if it means that new systems need to be designed to implement it. But, in light of the statement by Bill English, Labour needs to explain why National is wrong on this issue (if they are).

 

In any event, I can imagine a lot of people outside Auckland won't vote for a Labour Green Alliance if they think some of their petrol bill is going to pay for Auckland's transport woes! So, Jacinda, get cracking and explain how you're going to do it!

 

 

This morning on the AM show, Jacinda said that she disagreed with National's assertion that a regional fuel tax can't be implemented, but she didn't provide any details about how Labour can do this.

 

 

What reasons did Bill provide that it cannot be done?


9784 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2976

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1841493 8-Aug-2017 22:16
Send private message quote this post

I'd say the biggest reason is that you'll only score in the areas too far from the boundary to make it worth leaving the taxed area to fill up.

 

You see that in the US where a State borders another that has lower fuel taxes - anyone close enough will cross to the other State to fill up.






9728 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1505

Trusted

  Reply # 1841525 9-Aug-2017 06:47
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

I'd say the biggest reason is that you'll only score in the areas too far from the boundary to make it worth leaving the taxed area to fill up.

 

You see that in the US where a State borders another that has lower fuel taxes - anyone close enough will cross to the other State to fill up.

 

 

True, but that doesnt mean it cannot be done. Simply apply a levy in the billing systems of gas stations that are in AKL and surrounds, thats it. The few that decide to waste time and money on the fringes are miniscule. 


9728 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1505

Trusted

  Reply # 1841528 9-Aug-2017 07:04
Send private message quote this post

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.


9784 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2976

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1843231 10-Aug-2017 09:17
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?





9728 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1505

Trusted

  Reply # 1843291 10-Aug-2017 09:37
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:
tdgeek:

 

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.

 



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?

 

The infrastructure has not been maintained. It should have been funded annually keeping up to date. So, catching up 10 years of deferred spending cant be funded from one years rates and taxes


964 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 363


  Reply # 1843350 10-Aug-2017 10:26
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

tdgeek:

 

Geektastic:
tdgeek:

 

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.

 



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?

 

The infrastructure has not been maintained. It should have been funded annually keeping up to date. So, catching up 10 years of deferred spending cant be funded from one years rates and taxes

 

 

Too much money being spent on welfare, and probably lots of it lost on walfare fraud too. We need to tighten the reins a bit. We pay way more than enough tax in this country already.


Onward
11256 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4994

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1843360 10-Aug-2017 10:35
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Wiggum:

 

tdgeek:

 

Geektastic:
tdgeek:

 

Or, apply the 10c levy nationwide. The funds are for the respective province. Im not paying for AKL's lack of planning or deferred roading, but Im happy to pay for roading in my province.

 



Isn't that what tax and rates already pay for?

What is the benefit of yet another tax?

 

The infrastructure has not been maintained. It should have been funded annually keeping up to date. So, catching up 10 years of deferred spending cant be funded from one years rates and taxes

 

 

Too much money being spent on welfare, and probably lots of it lost on walfare fraud too. We need to tighten the reins a bit. We pay way more than enough tax in this country already.

 

 

 

 

Levels of benefit abuse and fraud are very low in NZ on international standards.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


964 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 363


  Reply # 1843365 10-Aug-2017 10:44
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4: Levels of benefit abuse and fraud are very low in NZ on international standards.

 

 

After watching the "Turei effect" on this very subject, I don't think I quiet agree with you.


Onward
11256 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4994

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1843366 10-Aug-2017 10:47
Send private message quote this post

Wiggum:

 

MikeB4: Levels of benefit abuse and fraud are very low in NZ on international standards.

 

 

After watching the "Turei effect" on this very subject, I don't think I quiet agree with you.

 

 

 

 

good grief, you base your ummm errr assessment on one incident, I base my statement on over a quarter of a century's professional involvement.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


5682 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2580

Subscriber

  Reply # 1843368 10-Aug-2017 10:48
Send private message quote this post

Benefit bashing is a national sport here. Harp on Turei all you want, it doesn't change the reality for most people. 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


160 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 53


  Reply # 1843409 10-Aug-2017 11:04
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post
964 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 363


  Reply # 1843457 10-Aug-2017 11:47
Send private message quote this post

gulfa:

 

...

 

 

This has already been discussed and I suggest you go do some research.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Vodafone TV — television in the cloud
Posted 17-Oct-2017 19:29


Nokia 8 review: Classy midrange pure Android phone
Posted 16-Oct-2017 07:27


Why carriers might want to embrace Commerce Commission study, MVNOs
Posted 13-Oct-2017 09:42


Fitbit launches Ionic, its health and fitness smartwatch
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:52


Xero launches machine learning automation to improve coding accuracy for small businesses
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:45


Bank of New Zealand uses Intel AI to detect financial crime
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:39


Sony launches Xperia XZ1, a smartphone with real-time 3D capture
Posted 11-Oct-2017 10:26


Notes on Nokia’s phone comeback
Posted 10-Oct-2017 10:06


Air New Zealand begins Inflight Wi-Fi rollout
Posted 9-Oct-2017 20:16


The latest mobile phones in perspective
Posted 9-Oct-2017 18:34


Review: Acronis True Image 2018 — serious backup
Posted 8-Oct-2017 11:22


Lenovo launches ThinkPad Anniversary Edition 25
Posted 7-Oct-2017 23:16


Less fone, more tech as Vodafone gets brand make-over
Posted 6-Oct-2017 08:16


API Talent Achieves AWS MSP Partner Status
Posted 5-Oct-2017 21:20


Stellar Consulting Group now a Domo Partner
Posted 5-Oct-2017 21:03



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.