An experienced politician/diplomat would be doing everything to deescalate the situation. But that does not appeal to the armchair generals of lounge heroes. Both side of a war are losers. Do you not see that Trumps threats to North Korea are the same as North Korea's? that is why i wrote "Both sides need to can the BS and go back to their sand pits."
I do not, and not even close. yes, we know what he has said, but this issue is decades old, and whatever Trump said, is minor compared to s;licing the arms off all yankees, vapourising the yankee homeland and so on.
I feel that while it is very justifiable to bag the US on MANY issues, bagging them here is wrong. They have been in talks, signed agreements, gave food and oil for a long long time, and it hasnt worked. Now they are being told we will fire missiles at your homeland. That is apparently not that bad. What if the US sad, and did, fire 4 missiles to land 25 miles from a NK port? Same thing, except it is NOT ok. But for NK, it is ok, and it is.
Lets say that an agreement is made, where NK will de nuclearise, back off at the DMZ, be nice, no more snactions, as long as the US leaves. Now, all in the region would be happy for peace, US has no need to stay there defending itself and SK and Japan, every nation will be happy, except one. NZ. KJU doesn't want peace, he doesnt want his people chatting to SK, seeing what they have, he will lose all power. Its suits KJU to be status quo, its his only option