Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ... | 26
Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5058

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1855876 31-Aug-2017 11:59
Send private message

Along with its Long and medium range liquid fueled missiles North Korea has large numbers of  short range solid fueled rockets that are both chemical and nuclear warhead capable. The range of these means that maritime targets and the Inchon/ Seoul regions of South Korea are targets for these. These missiles and their launch vehicles are very hard to find and very hard to detect when fired. It would be very difficult to take out all those targets in a first strike scenario.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


10026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1580

Trusted

  Reply # 1855880 31-Aug-2017 12:05
Send private message

SaltyNZ:

 

tdgeek:

 

The US will never pre emptively strike. When Nk does something that is seen as a strike, then the US will respond, then the rest of your paragraph will occur, to SK and Japan. SK cannot be defended anyhow

 

 

 

 

You wot!? Pre-emptive war is the US foreign policy signature move of the 20th Century!

 

 

I know, but this is different IMHO. NK is a 100% lying, decieving, game playing Govt, who is winning this "cold" war by a country mile. Ideal for a peaceful regime change, not a war, But China is the guardian, so thats out. If NK fired first, then the US has a free reign with Chinas acceptance, but China wont allow a takeover

 

So, just wait, till its "ok" to go in, if that scenario was to happen. Some may say its going to one day, and the sad losses of life are just pending. If Rikkitics suggestion came to pass that would solve it. Or we accept and love peaceful NK as the lying decieving Govt that is fully nuclear armed and ready, and the US now has 50 warheads ready to fire when the time comes. At leats in the USSE USA cold war it was a deterrent, its not for KJU, where one day his fatalism may be what erupts it all
 


 
 
 
 


1080 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 472


  Reply # 1855994 31-Aug-2017 15:22
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

SaltyNZ:

 

tdgeek:

 

The US will never pre emptively strike. When Nk does something that is seen as a strike, then the US will respond, then the rest of your paragraph will occur, to SK and Japan. SK cannot be defended anyhow

 

 

 

 

You wot!? Pre-emptive war is the US foreign policy signature move of the 20th Century!

 

 

I know, but this is different IMHO. NK is a 100% lying, decieving, game playing Govt, who is winning this "cold" war by a country mile. Ideal for a peaceful regime change, not a war, But China is the guardian, so thats out. If NK fired first, then the US has a free reign with Chinas acceptance, but China wont allow a takeover

 

So, just wait, till its "ok" to go in, if that scenario was to happen. Some may say its going to one day, and the sad losses of life are just pending. If Rikkitics suggestion came to pass that would solve it. Or we accept and love peaceful NK as the lying decieving Govt that is fully nuclear armed and ready, and the US now has 50 warheads ready to fire when the time comes. At leats in the USSE USA cold war it was a deterrent, its not for KJU, where one day his fatalism may be what erupts it all
 

 

 

They have put their money where their mouth is...they are delivering on their threats and they have been helped by another nation/s to get this far. It is my opinion that they will launch a direct attack on a nation sooner rather than later. This will probably deliberately miss in the first instance. They seem to have chosen the waters surrounding Guam as this is where the US bases its Pacific assets. They must be stopped, and its clear diplomacy will not help. It seems either China or Russia are wanting this to occur.


Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5058

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1855997 31-Aug-2017 15:29
Send private message

Are you saying that Russia and China want the Korean Peninsular wiped out?





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


10026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1580

Trusted

  Reply # 1856006 31-Aug-2017 15:39
Send private message

China doesn't as its a warzone in their backyard, and while SK and Japan aren't friendly with China, and while they share trade, its a bad look as the attacker only has one friend, China. Supporting that is China won't interfere if NK attacks first, and they have enforced their own trade blocks on NK, coal I think. China wants NK in one piece, not an NK where SK would have more right than China to take control.

 

NK knows it will be pummelled so no more luxury and ego for KJU, but the open issue is the culture. Pride and honour. he will have a fatalistic approach, if its going bad, go down fighting, translates to fire everything.

 

KJU wants no sanctions and keep nuclear weaponry, choose one, so its an impasse. Should the status quo be retained, NK is intact, KJU enjoys his rule, and this goes on until his people revolt


10026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1580

Trusted

  Reply # 1856007 31-Aug-2017 15:41
Send private message

More likely is NK fire the threat missiles, either at Guam or over Japan again, and Japan or the US shoots them down. NK will say the US just started the war, US will say correctly, that NK started the war. Even then, I doubt it will be all guns blazing, not for the first few hours.


Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5058

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1856012 31-Aug-2017 15:56
2 people support this post
Send private message

It will be almost impossible to control, both leaders are equally as dangerous and it will escalate very quickly. It will be very hard to stop Russia, China and  Japan being drawn into due to overflow incidents.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


1080 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 472


  Reply # 1856014 31-Aug-2017 16:02
Send private message

tdgeek:

 

More likely is NK fire the threat missiles, either at Guam or over Japan again, and Japan or the US shoots them down. NK will say the US just started the war, US will say correctly, that NK started the war. Even then, I doubt it will be all guns blazing, not for the first few hours.

 

 

Will actually be interesting to see if this technology works.

 

But yes, if their missile is shot down, NK will call it the beginning of a conflict.


10026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1580

Trusted

  Reply # 1856015 31-Aug-2017 16:06
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

tdgeek:

 

More likely is NK fire the threat missiles, either at Guam or over Japan again, and Japan or the US shoots them down. NK will say the US just started the war, US will say correctly, that NK started the war. Even then, I doubt it will be all guns blazing, not for the first few hours.

 

 

Will actually be interesting to see if this technology works.

 

But yes, if their missile is shot down, NK will call it the beginning of a conflict.

 

 

Yes, and for years and years, the US and SK are in the seas preparing to attack!


10026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1580

Trusted

  Reply # 1856017 31-Aug-2017 16:09
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

It will be almost impossible to control, both leaders are equally as dangerous and it will escalate very quickly. It will be very hard to stop Russia, China and  Japan being drawn into due to overflow incidents.

 

 

If NK fire missiles at Guam, and the US shot them down, whose at fault? 

 

Are those missiles an act of war?


10026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1580

Trusted

  Reply # 1856020 31-Aug-2017 16:20
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

tdgeek:

 

More likely is NK fire the threat missiles, either at Guam or over Japan again, and Japan or the US shoots them down. NK will say the US just started the war, US will say correctly, that NK started the war. Even then, I doubt it will be all guns blazing, not for the first few hours.

 

 

Will actually be interesting to see if this technology works.

 

But yes, if their missile is shot down, NK will call it the beginning of a conflict.

 

 

And in time, NK will be able to tell the globe that it has warheads aimed at West supporters of the US, that will make him more God than what he thinks he is in NK, and I assume we will want to hold talks.


Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5058

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1856021 31-Aug-2017 16:21
Send private message

One has to remember the NK has a lot of assets including such things as Mig 29s, circa 5,000 tanks, 4,000 rocket launchers, 8,000 artillery 70 submarines. It has circa 1,000,000 regular soldiers but has a reserve of around 5,000,000. Their Navy does not have good surface assets and a lot of the submarines are old but they can cause a lot of issues for US Navy if they want to bring their carriers closer to the peninsular.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


10026 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1580

Trusted

  Reply # 1856022 31-Aug-2017 16:26
Send private message

MikeB4:

 

One has to remember the NK has a lot of assets including such things as Mig 29s, circa 5,000 tanks, 4,000 rocket launchers, 8,000 artillery 70 submarines. It has circa 1,000,000 regular soldiers but has a reserve of around 5,000,000. Their Navy does not have good surface assets and a lot of the submarines are old but they can cause a lot of issues for US Navy if they want to bring their carriers closer to the peninsular.

 

 

I dint doubt that, Mike. My concern is that there has too much US and Trump hate and less realising what the years of failed talks and sanctions have allowed to be created. NK isn't a wild tiger that everyone wants to quite down, its loose now. No matter who is POTUS now, its loose.


Onward
11345 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5058

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1856038 31-Aug-2017 16:41
One person supports this post
Send private message

Don't get me wrong I believe that Kim Jung-Un is very dangerous and the path taken by North Korea is very dangerous and worrying. I just don't believe that military action is the answer for both sides. All possible diplomatic avenues need to be pursued included taking the US out of the diplomacy and replacing them with someone North Korea is prepared to listen to and maybe compromise  If NK does fire first the US will with good reason retaliate in force and the outcome is going to be horrific with a very high regional death toll.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


4028 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1608

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1856057 31-Aug-2017 17:24
Send private message

I wouldn't be overly concerned about their MiG-29s or their submarines. Only a couple of the planes have been observed flying lately so it is unlikely that more than a handful are airworthy and even those are going to be flown by pilots who get an hour in the air every week or two if they're lucky. (See here: http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/should-the-world-fear-north-koreas-air-force-20315)

A similar situation with the submarines. In theory they have 70 but most are barely floating and none other than a single experimental prototype for SLBM forces can fire anything but torpedoes. Nominally dangerous to surface ships but wouldn't last long in reality and useless against civilian targets.

Their artillery and tanks are more of a worry. Also museum pieces but the artillery in particular is still deadly. I don't know how many of their 5000 tanks actually work but to the extent they can roll them over the DMZ they could still cause problems for civilians until they are destroyed.




iPad Air + iPhone SE + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ... | 26
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Symantec selects Amazon Web Services to deliver cloud security
Posted 23-Nov-2017 10:40


New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35


WordPress and Indieweb: Take control of your online presence — 6:30 GridAKL Nov 30
Posted 11-Nov-2017 13:43



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.