Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




1431 posts

Uber Geek


#223069 11-Sep-2017 12:39
Send private message

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11920804

 

"Winston Peters has set out a firm new condition of going into government with Labour - it must tell him what its tax plans are.

 

New Zealand First could not support any Labour government without knowing its true intentions, he told the Herald.

 

Peters said he believed Labour already knew what it wanted from a proposed tax working group but was instead saying it had not decided."

 

 

 

Is this a reasonable request?

 

Shouldn't we all know what Labour's tax plans are before the election?


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
962 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1862308 11-Sep-2017 12:44
Send private message

But Jacindas smile is so pretty, why do we need details?

 

 

 

OK, sarcasm off, yes we should know details, but this is just Winston getting himself in the limelight making sure his voice is heard. He is essentially trying to hurt National even more by dilluting their "lack of details from Labour" message and put NZ First as a viable option to keep Labour honest.

 

In reality, Winston will serve Winston


15330 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1862309 11-Sep-2017 12:49
Send private message

If Winston Peters gets a call from Jacinda Ardern at 10pm on 23/9/2017 offering him a position in the Government he will be in. 





Mike

 

Consultant

 


The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


 
 
 
 


1199 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1862310 11-Sep-2017 12:51
Send private message

He is not the only one wanting to know these plans.

 

Winston always rocking the boat. But he does seem to be asking some intelligent questions.

 

 


Devastation by stupidity
12455 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1862311 11-Sep-2017 12:53
Send private message

Winston is just jumping on the bandwaggon. Labour's tax policies are a point of contention and people go on about them. In a couple of weeks we will know what the majority of voters think about this.

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 




1431 posts

Uber Geek


  #1862314 11-Sep-2017 12:57
Send private message

Wiggum:

 

He is not the only one wanting to know these plans.

 

Winston always rocking the boat. But he does seem to be asking some intelligent questions.

 

 

 

 

I just wonder whether Winston may be pushing Labour too far on this one.

 

Could it have the potential to make some NZ First supporters switch over to the Greens who don't seem to mind a vague Labour tax policy?


15330 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1862315 11-Sep-2017 13:01
Send private message

I like Labours tax working group, consulting before deciding is a sensible idea. It is similar to what the David Lange government did when they inherited a bankrupt nation.





Mike

 

Consultant

 


The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


1759 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1862325 11-Sep-2017 13:25
Send private message

Labour have had 9 years to work out a tax plan...like Winston I have also decided I want more info from Labour before I vote for them. Even their words around capital gains tax is vague and yet its a huge issue for a lot of people.


 
 
 
 


15330 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1862329 11-Sep-2017 13:30
Send private message

Tax should be based on the now and the future not the past. You have correctly written " huge issue for a lot of people" the working party will give the opportunity for many folk to make submissions instead of just being dished up a tax regime based on a voting majority in the house. Labour does have tax plans detailed already one just has to read their website but they are also looking forward and looking to what NZ wants. That's actually a good thing.

 

disclaimer; I have voted National in the last three elections.





Mike

 

Consultant

 


The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

He waka eke noa


1199 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1862334 11-Sep-2017 13:35
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

Labour have had 9 years to work out a tax plan...like Winston I have also decided I want more info from Labour before I vote for them. Even their words around capital gains tax is vague and yet its a huge issue for a lot of people.

 

 

What I am finding frustrating is that every time Jacinda opens her mouth on the subject, I just get even more confused. Glad to find out its not just me.


Devastation by stupidity
12455 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1862347 11-Sep-2017 14:04
Send private message

Labour keeps getting attacked for lack of clarity about its tax plans. Now National's HomeStart is being criticised as misleading. All I see here is politicians doing politician things in the run-up to an election. Where is the difference?

 

 





I don't think there is ever a bad time to talk about how absurd war is, how old men make decisions and young people die. - George Clooney
 


650 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1862380 11-Sep-2017 15:04
Send private message

Pumpedd:

 

Labour have had 9 years to work out a tax plan...like Winston I have also decided I want more info from Labour before I vote for them. Even their words around capital gains tax is vague and yet its a huge issue for a lot of people.

 

 

Yeah, I bet you're really on the fence about voting for Labour.

 

For all those who are struggling with this issue (and there seem to be many), this is how I have interpreted Labour's position:

 

  • any tax reform is not aimed at raising revenue generally - it is aimed at rebalancing the tax system away from taxing income and towards taxing capital
  • within the broader group of "capital", the top priority is real estate, due to the housing crisis
  • the family home is exempt from any new taxes as owning a home to live in is something Kiwis aspire to and fulfils a valuable societal purpose
  • the first crack at rebalancing the system is extending the bright line test from two years to five
  • if that's not enough to make an appreciable dent in the housing crisis, they reserve the right to take expert advice on and implement other options
  • policies announced by Labour in previous years give the best guidance as to what those other options are likely to be - likely a more comprehensive CGT than the "bright line"
  • other options (like a land tax or financial transaction tax) are still on the table, so the working group has some options to discuss, but Labour has never given any kind of indication that they would favour these taxes

To me this approach is entirely sensible and I am perfectly happy to vote for it.

 

My personal prediction is that the combination of the bright line test 2.0, reduced immigration, stricter controls for landlords and banned foreign ownership, together with the natural end of the most recent boom cycle, will mean there are no house price increases for years to come. If that's the case I cannot imagine how or why Labour would introduce any new taxes at all. I would certainly prefer them to leave the option of doing so open, rather than irrevocably committing to it now. On the other hand - the best time to introduce a CGT is probably during the slow part of the cycle, before the next boom starts. Imagine how much revenue would have been raised if National had introduced a CGT in 2012. Probably could have paid off a few of the $90b they borrowed. Alas...


2149 posts

Uber Geek


  #1862385 11-Sep-2017 15:16
Send private message

allio:

 

Yeah, I bet you're really on the fence about voting for Labour.

 

For all those who are struggling with this issue (and there seem to be many), this is how I have interpreted Labour's position:

 

  • any tax reform is not aimed at raising revenue generally - it is aimed at rebalancing the tax system away from taxing income and towards taxing capital
  • within the broader group of "capital", the top priority is real estate, due to the housing crisis
  • the family home is exempt from any new taxes as owning a home to live in is something Kiwis aspire to and fulfils a valuable societal purpose
  • the first crack at rebalancing the system is extending the bright line test from two years to five
  • if that's not enough to make an appreciable dent in the housing crisis, they reserve the right to take expert advice on and implement other options
  • policies announced by Labour in previous years give the best guidance as to what those other options are likely to be - likely a more comprehensive CGT than the "bright line"
  • other options (like a land tax or financial transaction tax) are still on the table, so the working group has some options to discuss, but Labour has never given any kind of indication that they would favour these taxes

To me this approach is entirely sensible and I am perfectly happy to vote for it.

 

My personal prediction is that the combination of the bright line test 2.0, reduced immigration, stricter controls for landlords and banned foreign ownership, together with the natural end of the most recent boom cycle, will mean there are no house price increases for years to come. If that's the case I cannot imagine how or why Labour would introduce any new taxes at all. I would certainly prefer them to leave the option of doing so open, rather than irrevocably committing to it now. On the other hand - the best time to introduce a CGT is probably during the slow part of the cycle, before the next boom starts. Imagine how much revenue would have been raised if National had introduced a CGT in 2012. Probably could have paid off a few of the $90b they borrowed. Alas...

 

 

Imagine if Labour had bought it in when house prices took off in the early 2000s, or when they updated the Income Tax Act in the 2003 or 2007 re-writes. 


1015 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1862398 11-Sep-2017 15:37
Send private message

Labour should have no trouble revealing how they intend to tax if they form a government. Having a committee after being elected is a horrifying idea. They have time to plan, and must do so.

 

Wether they keep taxes as they are, raise them or lower them. They absolutely must reveal their plan. It is NOT an unreasonable request at all.

 

Any political party could go and make tonnes of promises,

 

e.g. We will give everyone money towards a home, pay for their education, build Len Brown's Trainset and massive tunneling projects in the south island. We will increase social spending etc etc. 

But they must know where the money is going to come from. I am extremely concerned about about the general public being completely un-informed. And choosing to vote for a pretty face because she has made some nice promises.

 

 

 

 


1759 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #1862400 11-Sep-2017 15:44
Send private message

Wiggum:

 

Pumpedd:

 

Labour have had 9 years to work out a tax plan...like Winston I have also decided I want more info from Labour before I vote for them. Even their words around capital gains tax is vague and yet its a huge issue for a lot of people.

 

 

What I am finding frustrating is that every time Jacinda opens her mouth on the subject, I just get even more confused. Glad to find out its not just me.

 

 

She is really all wind, but I probably will vote for her cause National have left huge gaps in how lower income people are going to fare. Labour havnt said much on this either especially definitive spending on health.


321 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user


  #1862403 11-Sep-2017 15:49
Send private message

Lets stop bashing Jacinda Ardern for her looks and personality, She has proven in all the debates that she holds her own with Bill English. Look Read and listen to the ommentators after the debates They all agree that she has held her own or in many cases had the better of BE. While many are concerned about a Tax Policy and what it may hold. National also have produced policies that they need to work out and clarify Roading for example they want new roads developed in certain areas but like all new developments there will need to be much discussion and negotiations Education and the second language development they haven't a clue how this is going to work.

Like any new policy discussion and negotiations must take place and adjustments made. Take the Waterview tunnel which was originally proposed by Labour disregarded by National in favour of a above ground then changing their minds after much discussion and reverting to the original plan with the addition of extra lanes. Any sensible Government would follow these procedures so lets accept what Labours wants to do with their tax proposal if elected


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic




News »

Freeview On Demand app launches on Sony Android TVs
Posted 6-Aug-2020 13:35


UFB hits more than one million connections
Posted 6-Aug-2020 09:42


D-Link A/NZ extends COVR Wi-Fi EasyMesh System series with new three-pack
Posted 4-Aug-2020 15:01


New Zealand software Rfider tracks coffee from Colombia all the way to New Zealand businesses
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:35


Logitech G launches Pro X Wireless gaming headset
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:21


Sony Alpha 7S III provides supreme imaging performance
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:11


Sony introduces first CFexpress Type A memory card
Posted 3-Aug-2020 10:05


Marsello acquires Goody consolidating online and in-store marketing position
Posted 30-Jul-2020 16:26


Fonterra first major customer for Microsoft's New Zealand datacentre
Posted 30-Jul-2020 08:07


Everything we learnt at the IBM Cloud Forum 2020
Posted 29-Jul-2020 14:45


Dropbox launches native HelloSign workflow and data residency in Australia
Posted 29-Jul-2020 12:48


Spark launches 5G in Palmerston North
Posted 29-Jul-2020 09:50


Lenovo brings speed and smarter features to new 5G mobile gaming phone
Posted 28-Jul-2020 22:00


Withings raises $60 million to enable bridge between patients and healthcare
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:51


QNAP integrates Catalyst Cloud Object Storage into Hybrid Backup solution
Posted 28-Jul-2020 21:40



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.