Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 
5147 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2398


  Reply # 1869967 21-Sep-2017 09:22
Send private message quote this post

networkn:

 

Rikkitic:

 

networkn:

 

It's a nightmare for a small business under a Labour Government. The repealing of the 90 day thing is especially difficult. Apparently they are going to replace it with a fast simple system, which I imagine will be something like: 

 

If you employ someone, no matter how unsuitable they are for the position, what they do or don't do, how they behave, you will need to pay them a years salary to get rid of them.

 

What Labour continues to misunderstand, mostly because no-one who is a Labour MP has ever run a business or had responsibility for staff, is that as a business owner, staff are your biggest asset. If a staff member is good, you will do everything you can to keep them. Equally, if it's required to remove someone from your business, the costs are already significant.

 

 

 

 

As an employer, do you really need 90 days to determine if an employee is suitable? This is a genuine question. I have never been en employer but I would think that if someone was not up to the job or had hidden character flaws, that would become fairly obvious within a month. How important is the 90 days, really?

 

 

 

 

Yes, in my profession 90 days is minimum. I have had staff I've had a pretty good feeling about after a few weeks, others take time to learn the breadth of the job, prove they can handle paperwork. There is a lot of work that goes into good employees in a service business. Some people are good hamsters can churn away at preset jobs but can't really cope with stuff outside the normal, other people can be a bit more flexible but don't handle paperwork/record keeping.  

 

Outside of the 90 days, there is a series of steps required to remove someone from a business position, which involves meeting, outlining shortfallings, providing support to help them acheive the requirements, more meetings more support. It can *easily* take 3 months unless someone did something seriously bad, and even then...  

 

During the 90 days, I would typically meet with new staff many times, making sure they are comfortable in the role, letting them outline issues, raising our own, trying to work together to get a solution to issues that works for everyone. 

 

I have had bizarre situations where people have made up CV's, with invented certifications and forged certifications lied about attending onsite etc. That same person provided fake references.

 

 

 

 

My wife - when she had to employ staff - found that the impact of the 90 day rule was that those parasitic leeches who were smart and deceptive enough to bluff their way through the interview process were also always smart enough to be able to keep the bluff up until day 91 - when they became "permanent".

 

I don't think it makes much difference.

 

I've been running a service business for a friend for a while.  I can see the frustration that entails, it's a good business (that I didn't manage to destroy LOL) but extremely hard to get staff who'd share the vision when on wages - and without the vision, you're doomed. 


15142 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3935

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1869997 21-Sep-2017 09:40
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

 

My wife - when she had to employ staff - found that the impact of the 90 day rule was that those parasitic leeches who were smart and deceptive enough to bluff their way through the interview process were also always smart enough to be able to keep the bluff up until day 91 - when they became "permanent".

 

I don't think it makes much difference.

 

I've been running a service business for a friend for a while.  I can see the frustration that entails, it's a good business (that I didn't manage to destroy LOL) but extremely hard to get staff who'd share the vision when on wages - and without the vision, you're doomed. 

 

 

Unfortunately, I tend to try and see the good in people a little too much. If I can see a glimmer of hope, I'll try and turn that into something more. I have learned to be a little harder recently. Replacing staff is a real challenge, which is why will argue vehemently against those who claim that business owners are out to exploit staff for their own profits. It's the hardest part of running my business, and largely I have good staff. 

 

Having been both an employee and an employer, I can see both sides. It really opened my eyes to what a terrible employee I was (Not really but I was challenging for sure, though honest and exceptionally hard working).

 

I have had a couple of instances where I have used the 90 day period (Both were very clear cut) and one person I managed out of my business using the proper methods. It took 7 months. Probably cost $20,000.

 

 

 

 


 
 
 
 


957 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 363


  Reply # 1870111 21-Sep-2017 11:16
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

jonathan18:

 

 

 

That said, I'd have thought Wiggum's politics were far to the right of National anyway, so as long as his criticism applies to both parties!

 

 

I try to put my criticism where its due. In this case its at both national and labour. That said, more on labour because what labour is proposing here is actually just making an already bad policy worse.

 

But saying that, Don't I have the right to put my criticism anywhere I please? Even if I'm biased and its not at both parties, thats still my right. What you seems unable to grasp is that even if I was a going to vote on red shirts alone, thats still my right. I can apply criticism to blue shirts. it does not matter if the red shirts are grubby/and full of holes. I want a red shirt. You can't tell people where to put their opinions/and how to apply them, thats sounds very undemocratic to me. 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39


UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26


The Warehouse Group to adopt IBM Cloud to support digital transformation
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:22


Dimension Data peeks into digital business 2018
Posted 11-Dec-2017 10:55


2018 Cyber Security Predictions
Posted 7-Dec-2017 14:55


Global Govtech Accelerator to drive public sector innovation in Wellington
Posted 7-Dec-2017 11:21


Stuff Pix media strategy a new direction
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:37


Digital transformation is dead
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:31


Fake news and cyber security
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:27


Dimension Data New Zealand strengthens cybersecurity practice
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:27


Epson NZ launches new Expression Premium Photo range
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:26


Eventbrite and Twickets launch integration partnership in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:23


New Fujifilm macro lens lands in New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:16



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.