If I had considered 100k to be important, there are other things I could have done.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
If I had considered 100k to be important, there are other things I could have done.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
MikeB4:
I will be brutally honest here, I think the attitude displayed here regarding sport is snobbery mixed with envy and is total bollocks.
Sport in itself is of no value to society other than as entertainment. Thought there is a flow-on effect as those millionaires spend their earnings. But our appreciation and admiration for those professional athletes is disproportional to their public benefit. Personally I'm as guilty of it as any kiwi, but it's irrational.
Is it a societal problem? No I don't think so, but there is a societal shift that places less emphasis on academic achievement, more emphasis on non-academic subjects. There is a sporting industry though, but it is not a big employer. I think that it can still be a career choice, but like any choice it needs to be weighed up carefully, like any profession. Training as a lawyer by no means guarantees success, though likelihood of success is probably relative to remuneration, which is a pretty basic economic theory.
Maybe people just enjoy watching sport more than say, watching... I don't know, TedX talks?
Believe it or not, there are people who get more enjoyment from watching a chess match or robot wars than rugby.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
GV27:
Maybe people just enjoy watching sport more than say, watching... I don't know, TedX talks?
I think i'm in that boat. Does that justify idolizing the good players?
Rikkitic:
Believe it or not, there are people who get more enjoyment from watching a chess match or robot wars than rugby.
So what? I enjoy lots of different things. Music, Rugby, Squash and Sport in General, movies, tv. They are all valid.
Rikkitic:
Believe it or not, there are people who get more enjoyment from watching a chess match or robot wars than rugby.
I do believe it. I'm not the one who insists people should like the things I say they should like.
GV27:Rikkitic:Believe it or not, there are people who get more enjoyment from watching a chess match or robot wars than rugby.
I do believe it. I'm not the one who insists people should like the things I say they should like.
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996
I have seen two articles in 2 days rating the Labour politicians and then their first 6 months. Both written by left-leaning journalists. I'd agree with some, but some of the ratings are awfully wrong. They gave PM 8/10, and I am unsure which country they live, but she is a 6 at best. She has shown next to NO leadership. She does the popular trendy things but what has SHE actually done? Shane Jones got an 8. Seriously!? Winston Peters an 8. I'd likely rate him in 7 and mostly because he hasn't really opened his mouth yet.
As for the break down of how they have tracked in 6 months, it's obvious they needed to mention the things you couldn't not mention that were bad, but the weight they have put on the "plusses" is just crazy.
Back towards the topic then...
There's some interesting insight to be gained from this (unscientific, but large sample size) poll that NewsHub ran the other day.
It seems that even amongst voters who elected this government, there is a growing realisation that while they may have had high hopes, the reality is a bit of a flop.
networkn: 60% sit between awful and bad combined. Even trump is above 40 percent lol
Ssshhhh! We must not compare Jacinda with Trump. She will be infuriated ;-)
I would not give that poll much credence
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |