Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | ... | 59
671 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 183


  Reply # 1900211 13-Nov-2017 13:56
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

I see the anti-everything brigade at the greens have struck the first blow to the "harmonious" Labour/NZF/Greens alliance -

 

 

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11943461

 

 


535 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 116


  Reply # 1900217 13-Nov-2017 14:17
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

sen8or:

 

I see the anti-everything brigade at the greens have struck the first blow to the "harmonious" Labour/NZF/Greens alliance -

 

 

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11943461

 

 

 

 

FYI:

 

She said Labour had always known the Greens would oppose it and it was made clear in negotiations before it signed up for its confidence and supply agreement.

 

It would not impact on the Government's ability to sign up to the CPTPP.

 

 

 

You were saying?


 
 
 
 


535 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 116


  Reply # 1900221 13-Nov-2017 14:28
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

MaxLV:

 

Pumpedd:

 

I am not sure the thread is anti Jacinda, but more anti Labour. They are running at the moment with an air of arrogance including several Ministers and the PM.

 

They are need to settle down a bit quicker and start working like a cohesive team. They desperately need some leadership and discipline.

 

Time will tell. If Jacinda can settle down and start speaking to all of NZ instead of a select few she could be one of the best PMs ever.

 



She, and her coalition government already speak for 50.4% of us.

This thread is mostly from some of the 44% who still haven't realised the majority of New Zealanders wanted and got New Zealand changed from the 'I'm all right Jack, keep your hands off my stack' previous government.

 

 

 

 

To the "We'll steal your stack and give it to those who have not earned it" government, I presume.

 

 

 

It's also a long bow to draw to claim that she speaks for 54% of the population. She doesn't. There is no evidence that a person who voted NZF wanted her or her party as PM etc, or that one who voted Green did.

 



So you think the taxes you pay is stealing by the government? I rest my case.

You're right, it's not 54%, but 50.4% of us voted for a change of government. Isn't it time you accepted that fact?

BTW I voted for NZF (party vote) and Labour (electorate vote) and as others have pointed out I wasn't the only one. As for the greens, They had an agreement with Labour to change the government. You might want to rethink your position on that.


1056 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 117


  Reply # 1900235 13-Nov-2017 14:51
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

sen8or:


I see the anti-everything brigade at the greens have struck the first blow to the "harmonious" Labour/NZF/Greens alliance -


 


http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11943461


 




What blow? From the article seems that National will support it.
Still goes through without greens.

I don't like the thought of multinational companies having power to sue our govternment if we make a law that effects their business, nothing can do about it when both big parties seem to be happy to give them that power though.

405 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 77


  Reply # 1900238 13-Nov-2017 14:53
2 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

MaxLV:

 

You're right, it's not 54%, but 50.4% of us voted for a change of government. Isn't it time you accepted that fact?

 

That's an oversimplification of the existing MMP environment. Winston Peters may claim that, however voters going into the election voted on a number of key policies many of which many were not aligned at all between Labour, the Greens, NZ First or National. That isn't representative of voting for a change of government, rather some moderate changes in direction. Indeed many NZ First supporters I've interacted with are disappointed that he chose to go with Labour instead of National, others are concerned about the Greens influence, and others are okay with going with Labour on some issues. Hardly a cohesive "change of government" arrangement is it.


671 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 183


  Reply # 1900248 13-Nov-2017 15:26
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

MaxLV:

 

sen8or:

 

I see the anti-everything brigade at the greens have struck the first blow to the "harmonious" Labour/NZF/Greens alliance -

 

 

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11943461

 

 

 

 

FYI:

 

She said Labour had always known the Greens would oppose it and it was made clear in negotiations before it signed up for its confidence and supply agreement.

 

It would not impact on the Government's ability to sign up to the CPTPP.

 

 

 

You were saying?

 

 

It will only not impact the Government signing because they can get the support of National, without it, it will not pass. Ofcourse, it is not know what (if any) further changes to the legislation that the select committee will have or if National will want any concessions to help pass legislation. I would hope National doesn't do any "politicing" with the deal, if it looks good and is good for the country, then they should support it rather than try and use it as a chance to score points against Labour.

 

What happens to the next piece of legislation that goes against the Greens morals, will "Labour have always known they Greens would oppose it" too?

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11942657

 

you spin me right round baby right round like a record baby right round round round......


10114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3101

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1900366 13-Nov-2017 20:04
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

MaxLV:

Geektastic:


MaxLV:


Pumpedd:


I am not sure the thread is anti Jacinda, but more anti Labour. They are running at the moment with an air of arrogance including several Ministers and the PM.


They are need to settle down a bit quicker and start working like a cohesive team. They desperately need some leadership and discipline.


Time will tell. If Jacinda can settle down and start speaking to all of NZ instead of a select few she could be one of the best PMs ever.




She, and her coalition government already speak for 50.4% of us.

This thread is mostly from some of the 44% who still haven't realised the majority of New Zealanders wanted and got New Zealand changed from the 'I'm all right Jack, keep your hands off my stack' previous government.



 


To the "We'll steal your stack and give it to those who have not earned it" government, I presume.


 


It's also a long bow to draw to claim that she speaks for 54% of the population. She doesn't. There is no evidence that a person who voted NZF wanted her or her party as PM etc, or that one who voted Green did.




So you think the taxes you pay is stealing by the government? I rest my case.

You're right, it's not 54%, but 50.4% of us voted for a change of government. Isn't it time you accepted that fact?

BTW I voted for NZF (party vote) and Labour (electorate vote) and as others have pointed out I wasn't the only one. As for the greens, They had an agreement with Labour to change the government. You might want to rethink your position on that.



Again, I can't agree entirely. For example, the change some of them may have wanted was not necessarily the one they got. They may have been voting to get a different National coalition rather than the Labour one. However, as we have seen, voters do not necessarily get to do the choosing in NZ!





gzt

9165 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1291


  Reply # 1900378 13-Nov-2017 20:49
3 people support this post
Send private message quote this post

They chose to vote for Peters to represent them, and Peters chose to vote for Labour. Voters in NZ have more choices than the UK for example and have substantially more influence.

10203 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1638

Trusted

  Reply # 1900391 13-Nov-2017 21:51
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

rugrat:
sen8or:

 

I see the anti-everything brigade at the greens have struck the first blow to the "harmonious" Labour/NZF/Greens alliance -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11943461

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



What blow? From the article seems that National will support it.
Still goes through without greens.

I don't like the thought of multinational companies having power to sue our govternment if we make a law that effects their business, nothing can do about it when both big parties seem to be happy to give them that power though.

 

That right. If the Greens sunk it, thats democracy. As it happens, Labour wasnt in favour but have got concessions. National wants it, as now does Labour. The process works. No FTA will be 100% for everyone, but IMHO, this one does satisfy most, if not the Greens. 


55 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 43


  Reply # 1900444 14-Nov-2017 03:18
Send private message quote this post

Geektastic:

 

MaxLV:

 

So you think the taxes you pay is stealing by the government? I rest my case.

You're right, it's not 54%, but 50.4% of us voted for a change of government. Isn't it time you accepted that fact?

BTW I voted for NZF (party vote) and Labour (electorate vote) and as others have pointed out I wasn't the only one. As for the greens, They had an agreement with Labour to change the government. You might want to rethink your position on that.

 



Again, I can't agree entirely. For example, the change some of them may have wanted was not necessarily the one they got. They may have been voting to get a different National coalition rather than the Labour one. However, as we have seen, voters do not necessarily get to do the choosing in NZ!

 

You need to wipe your glasses, they're all fogged up with desperation and blubbery tears.

 

NZF voters did not vote for a different National or a new Labour. They voted to get as many of the NZF policies over the line in the next three years. That's what they chose, that's what they got.

 

National will not hold your simplistic viewpoint on NZ politics thankfully, they will be working out how to get more parliamentary friends so they have a fighting chance next election, otherwise they'll lose again.


42 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 18


  Reply # 1900455 14-Nov-2017 07:24
Send private message quote this post

Fred99: I believe two objections to the TPP were ISDS and IP laws - particularly when the USA was to be a partner. With the USA out, then who knows what? I'm not in NZ atm, scouring of NZ news sites doesn't seem to indicate the media are interested. The original TPPA would have given NZ a very small net gain from increased access to markets, offset by a loss on increased cost of pharmaceutical and medical devices due to increased patent duration. It would seem to be nuts if TPPA with no USA would include that increase to patents - as only the US wanted it. I bloody well hope that Labour won't betray NZ interests in the vain hope of giving way to US demands, when now the US will offer nothing at all in return.

 

 

 

USA's contribution to global economic output is 25%. The current 11 countries put together make 15%. Without USA, this isn't that great a deal. The current 11 nations would be more than happy to sign FTAs with NZ without much fuss anyway.


55 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 43


  Reply # 1900463 14-Nov-2017 07:51
Send private message quote this post

mrfte:

 

Fred99: I believe two objections to the TPP were ISDS and IP laws - particularly when the USA was to be a partner. With the USA out, then who knows what? I'm not in NZ atm, scouring of NZ news sites doesn't seem to indicate the media are interested. The original TPPA would have given NZ a very small net gain from increased access to markets, offset by a loss on increased cost of pharmaceutical and medical devices due to increased patent duration. It would seem to be nuts if TPPA with no USA would include that increase to patents - as only the US wanted it. I bloody well hope that Labour won't betray NZ interests in the vain hope of giving way to US demands, when now the US will offer nothing at all in return.

 

 

 

USA's contribution to global economic output is 25%. The current 11 countries put together make 15%. Without USA, this isn't that great a deal. The current 11 nations would be more than happy to sign FTAs with NZ without much fuss anyway.

 

 

Hrm. Let's get TPPA 12 negotiations under way - bring in China. They're in the fairly rapid process of replacing the US anyway, might as well bring them on board.

 

 

 

 


42 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 18


  Reply # 1900464 14-Nov-2017 07:52
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

dwilson:

 

mrfte:

 

Fred99: I believe two objections to the TPP were ISDS and IP laws - particularly when the USA was to be a partner. With the USA out, then who knows what? I'm not in NZ atm, scouring of NZ news sites doesn't seem to indicate the media are interested. The original TPPA would have given NZ a very small net gain from increased access to markets, offset by a loss on increased cost of pharmaceutical and medical devices due to increased patent duration. It would seem to be nuts if TPPA with no USA would include that increase to patents - as only the US wanted it. I bloody well hope that Labour won't betray NZ interests in the vain hope of giving way to US demands, when now the US will offer nothing at all in return.

 

 

 

USA's contribution to global economic output is 25%. The current 11 countries put together make 15%. Without USA, this isn't that great a deal. The current 11 nations would be more than happy to sign FTAs with NZ without much fuss anyway.

 

 

Hrm. Let's get TPPA 12 negotiations under way - bring in China. They're in the fairly rapid process of replacing the US anyway, might as well bring them on board.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We already have an FTA with them which saw our exports increase 4 times over the decade since it was signed.


1150 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 507


  Reply # 1901191 15-Nov-2017 12:10
Send private message quote this post

I do not get what Adern and Co. are trying to do here with Manus Island. 

 

Australia created this issue and it is Australia's to deal with. Many times Australia have said a clear NO to us yet Arden doesnt let it go. She has now offered $2.7M to help these people. Why? I dont want Australia's problems here!!

 

She has created a rift between the 2 countries now. Has she not got enough to do? If she really wanted to help she was standing beside  the Myanmar President quite a lot and did she offer them money as well to assist them in their humanitarian issues?

 

I also read in todays papers that Treasury are preparing to borrow NZ$billions more than Labour promised to satisfy their appetite for debt. 

 

Stay at home Adern and look after the Kiwis you said you would!!! We are not a wealthy country like Australia. 

 

and PS

 

Jacinda you looked a bit like a school girl on the diplomatic stage over the last 10 days. If you want to be taken seriously you need to look like a serious diplomat and also earn the reputation.


50 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 17


  Reply # 1901237 15-Nov-2017 13:11
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

dwilson:

 

Geektastic:

 

MaxLV:

 

So you think the taxes you pay is stealing by the government? I rest my case.

You're right, it's not 54%, but 50.4% of us voted for a change of government. Isn't it time you accepted that fact?

BTW I voted for NZF (party vote) and Labour (electorate vote) and as others have pointed out I wasn't the only one. As for the greens, They had an agreement with Labour to change the government. You might want to rethink your position on that.

 



Again, I can't agree entirely. For example, the change some of them may have wanted was not necessarily the one they got. They may have been voting to get a different National coalition rather than the Labour one. However, as we have seen, voters do not necessarily get to do the choosing in NZ!

 

You need to wipe your glasses, they're all fogged up with desperation and blubbery tears.

 

NZF voters did not vote for a different National or a new Labour. They voted to get as many of the NZF policies over the line in the next three years. That's what they chose, that's what they got.

 

National will not hold your simplistic viewpoint on NZ politics thankfully, they will be working out how to get more parliamentary friends so they have a fighting chance next election, otherwise they'll lose again.

 

 

I agree with what you say.

 

To say that the majority of the voters voted for "change" sounds very nice, very idealistic, very aspirational. But let's be honest, when you cast your vote, you are specifically giving your support to that party/person and their policies. To paint some parties as a 'change' vote over against others is not correct. For sure, Labour was offering more change than Nat's. But what's the first thing Jacinda does? Continues the fight for the TPP the same as National had been doing for the last few years. National was somewhat campaigning on more of the same, but certainly for improvement and progress, not status quo.

 

A vote for a possible (or likely) coalition partner is not a vote for the major party, to consider it like that will end in the demise of the minor parties - which is what we've seen in this election. The minor parties are there to represent the minorities, the major parties represent the mainstream - and NZ needs both.

 

People who voted Green should feel short-changed, because they have been sold out cheap. They had every bit as much negotiating power as Winston/NZF but they got the thin end of the stick. So to say that a vote for Greens was a vote to get as many Green policies over the line should have been true, however, in this case all it has done is prop up labour, who have in turn rode roughshod over the greens opposition to the TPP.

 

So is this coalition a true representation of all the voters: Lab/NZF/Green? Not really. I think a Nat/Green or Nat/NZF coalition would have provided a better representation of the respective voters than this current govt.

 

(btw, i'm all for the TPP)


1 | ... | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | ... | 59
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Mobile market competition issues ComCom should watch
Posted 18-Dec-2017 10:52


New Zealand government to create digital advisory group
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:47


Australia datum changes means whole country moving 1.8 metres north-east
Posted 16-Dec-2017 08:39


UAV Traffic Management Trial launching today in New Zealand
Posted 12-Dec-2017 16:06


UFB connections pass 460,000
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:26


The Warehouse Group to adopt IBM Cloud to support digital transformation
Posted 11-Dec-2017 11:22


Dimension Data peeks into digital business 2018
Posted 11-Dec-2017 10:55


2018 Cyber Security Predictions
Posted 7-Dec-2017 14:55


Global Govtech Accelerator to drive public sector innovation in Wellington
Posted 7-Dec-2017 11:21


Stuff Pix media strategy a new direction
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:37


Digital transformation is dead
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:31


Fake news and cyber security
Posted 7-Dec-2017 09:27


Dimension Data New Zealand strengthens cybersecurity practice
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:27


Epson NZ launches new Expression Premium Photo range
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:26


Eventbrite and Twickets launch integration partnership in Australia and New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2017 20:23



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.