Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
11891 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3855

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1982856 25-Mar-2018 13:38
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

I think I did not do a good job of explaining my point, or people did not understand it. I do not think anyone in any position should be held liable after the fact for things that happened under their watch, as long as no criminality is involved. I do think they should remain accountable, in the sense of having to submit to questions about their performance and the things that happened while they were responsible. I think this should apply to Ministers in particular, but also other officials.The reason I think this is because the things people in charge decide continue to have an effect long after they are gone, and I think it is legitimate to be able to question them about those. The excuse that 'I don't work there any more' should not be sufficient to avoid having to provide any explanations when consequences emerge later. 

 

Your question doesn't apply to me since I am a pensioner, but in principle, yes, I should be required to explain why I made the decisions I did at the time. I shouldn't be accountable  in any liability sense as long as no criminal behaviour was involved, but people are entitled to ask why I did that and didn't do this and they are entitled to the courtesy of a proper reply.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The problem is that such people would be outside the chain of command, could possibly have conflicts of interest which have arisen since leaving, could jeopardise matters going on in their old workplaces which they know nothing about and all sorts of other things.

 

I think, ultimately, in government the correct route is that the current Minister is responsible today and needs to be answering the questions based on briefings from his staff who were in the department at the time. There's little point, really, in a non criminal scenario, in questioning someone about something that happened some while ago, the resolution of which they cannot control any longer and which may well be superseded by other policies and decisions made subsequently.








Glurp
8225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3784

Subscriber

  Reply # 1982861 25-Mar-2018 13:48
Send private message

The intention of my suggestion was that they could be compelled to answer legitimate questions about their time in office if they were not otherwise forthcoming. 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6160

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1982898 25-Mar-2018 16:46
Send private message

Rikkitic:

The intention of my suggestion was that they could be compelled to answer legitimate questions about their time in office if they were not otherwise forthcoming. 


 



Dr Coleman did answer the question numerous times so no issue.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 




Glurp
8225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3784

Subscriber

  Reply # 1982903 25-Mar-2018 16:54
Send private message

Not according to the transcript I saw. He said no-one ever told him about it. The journalist found that remarkable and tried to press him for details. Then he hung up. That is not 'answering the question', but as I have tried to make clear here, my own question is about something else. I was merely using Coleman as an example.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6160

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1982909 25-Mar-2018 17:04
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

Not according to the transcript I saw. He said no-one ever told him about it. The journalist found that remarkable and tried to press him for details. Then he hung up. That is not 'answering the question', but as I have tried to make clear here, my own question is about something else. I was merely using Coleman as an example.


 



Because the journalist did not like an answer it does not make it unanswered. Your example has no weight and there is no issue. If there is negligence, mistakes or illegal action by officials there is already in place processes and sanctions available. We don't need prosecution by press in Aotearoa.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 




Glurp
8225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3784

Subscriber

  Reply # 1982910 25-Mar-2018 17:08
Send private message

Read what I have been saying. I'm not talking about legal culpability, just a refusal to answer questions. It is still a valid point. If you think journalists have no business asking questions of their betters, then I am not surprised that newspapers here are in trouble.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6160

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1982914 25-Mar-2018 17:22
One person supports this post
Send private message

Journalist of course can ask but they must accept when it has been answered even if the answer does not fit their predetermined script. The right not answer is the same as the right to answer.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 




Glurp
8225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3784

Subscriber

  Reply # 1982943 25-Mar-2018 17:32
Send private message

Since you want the last word so badly, I will let you have it. This is going nowhere.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6160

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1982944 25-Mar-2018 17:35
Send private message

Rikkitic:

Since you want the last word so badly, I will let you have it. This is going nowhere.


 



Good grief I was answering YOUR post asking me to read again what you have written. I guess you only want agreement with you, hmm much like the RNZ *cough* journalist.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6160

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1982945 25-Mar-2018 17:35
Send private message

Rikkitic:

Since you want the last word so badly, I will let you have it. This is going nowhere.


 



Good grief I was answering YOUR post asking me to read again what you have written. I guess you only want agreement with you, hmm much like the RNZ *cough* journalist.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


1139 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 462
Inactive user


  Reply # 1982946 25-Mar-2018 17:35
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Since you want the last word so badly, I will let you have it. This is going nowhere.

 

 

So who got the last word here?  wink


13114 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6160

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1982952 25-Mar-2018 17:45
Send private message

Word




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 




Glurp
8225 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3784

Subscriber

  Reply # 1982955 25-Mar-2018 17:55
Send private message

Last

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


479 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 218


  Reply # 1983111 26-Mar-2018 06:40
One person supports this post
Send private message

Here's the rub of it: is Radio NZ currently applying the same levels of scrutiny to any current ministers about their policies, non-existent or otherwise? I think we all know the answer here. 


11891 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3855

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1983290 26-Mar-2018 10:50
Send private message

GV27:

 

Here's the rub of it: is Radio NZ currently applying the same levels of scrutiny to any current ministers about their policies, non-existent or otherwise? I think we all know the answer here. 

 

 

 

 

They do mostly apply the same technique though - ask the same question again and again, even when it has been answered, if you do not like the answer....K Ryan, J Campbell et al take note!






1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.