Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
4948 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2007


  Reply # 1985431 29-Mar-2018 14:43
Send private message

Freedom of speech includes freedom not to speak.

 

If you want to force someone to answer a question you would need to drag them into a court proceeding or Royal Commission or similar.  There would be law changes required if ministers are currently exempt from those issues. I'd question the point of going to all that trouble.  If someone has a mind to be uncooperative, their answers can be just as frustrating and unhelpful as their silence.

 

The Coleman-Fergusson interview underlines an apparent issue with current NZ journalists.  They only prepare one line of questioning.  When that stalls all they have the wit to do is repeat, repeat, repeat.

 

 





Mike

2534 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1196


  Reply # 1985538 29-Mar-2018 17:44
Send private message

1.  You do realise that it is the Board of the DHB not the Minister that is responsible for the maintenance and condition of the DHB's assets don't you? The law is clear on this. If the Board never disclosed the issue to the Minister, and he says that they didn't, then why should he be held accountable and for what?

 

2.  He can actually be compelled to answer questions about what he knew or did. Select Committees, and the courts have the power to require him to attend, and there can be sanctions if he does not answer a Select Committee's questions. The Auditor-General and Ombudsman also have some powers in appropriate circumstances. However a journalist cannot, and indeed should not be able to, compel anyone to answer questions just because they feel they have a story. Can you imagine how nasty things could get if any journalist or blogger had that power?

 

3.  When the question has been answered and the journalist is just badgering him, then hanging up is perfectly reasonable.


2534 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1196


  Reply # 1986112 30-Mar-2018 17:22
Send private message

Plus:

 

4.  If the journalist thinks he is lying, she can always make Official Information Act requests to the DHB and/or the Ministry of Health, for any advice that was provided to the former Minister.

 

So I think this is a non-issue.




Glurp
7970 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3711

Subscriber

  Reply # 1986150 30-Mar-2018 17:57
One person supports this post
Send private message

That's a lot of verbiage for a non-issue.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


703 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 67

Trusted

  Reply # 1986219 31-Mar-2018 01:40
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

That's a lot of verbiage for a non-issue.

 

 

 

 

Isn't it just.

 

 

 

Quite the comedy...

 

 

 

Quite instructional. I think you will find many of those who are all for Coleman being blameless, have been seen in previous threads prattling about Responsibility, Professionalism, Integrity...

 

Your question was not a difficult one to understand Rikkitic. The point was not vague or confused. Your opposition is biased. The saddest thing of all however is they honestly cannot see it.

 

 


67 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1994381 11-Apr-2018 17:22
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

Geektastic:

 

How can he be accountable after the fact? Ministers are not responsible for the daily running and maintenance of hospitals any more than Theo Spierings is responsible for who milks the cows.

 

 

Isn't the Minister responsible for policy? If a hospital is rotting from poor maintenance due to inadequate funding and wilful refusal to allow necessary finance for repair, surely that is something a Minister should be held accountable for? As Truman said, the buck stops at the top. Otherwise why have a Minister at all?

 

 

 

 

Quoting Patrick Smelley, as reported here

 

"Is pedantic to question the narrative about under-investment at Middlemore when today’s DHB stats show the capital budget is significantly underspent? I.e., under-funding can’t be the issue if money for capital upgrades is going unspent."

 

So I am inclined to think that no, the previous government did not have responsibility for this smokescreen


4948 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2007


  Reply # 1994628 12-Apr-2018 09:10
Send private message

What's interesting is to see what Middlemore did choose to spend capital on in the last few years.

 

Not hard info to find.

 

Do a little research and form your own conclusions.

 

 





Mike

2534 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1196


  Reply # 1995226 13-Apr-2018 09:49
Send private message

Also an interesting take on the story in a Herald column here

 

Even given that Hooton's well known political sympathies, he makes some good points.

 

It is starting to smell like a political beat-up, which the media are breathlessly reporting without checking up on things first.

 

 


648 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 554


  Reply # 1995245 13-Apr-2018 10:17
Send private message

JimmyH:

 

Also an interesting take on the story in a Herald column here

 

Even given that Hooton's well known political sympathies, he makes some good points.

 

It is starting to smell like a political beat-up, which the media are breathlessly reporting without checking up on things first.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agreed.   Here are some of the highlights:

 

  • Middlemore Hospital continues to function, including its highly regarded intensive care and burns units. Would such services continue were sewage really seeping down the walls as implied?
  • no one in authority seems to have been told about the alleged sewage or even the alleged extent of leaky buildings
  • just two-and-a-half weeks ago, new Health Minister David Clark and local MP Louisa Wall also denied being told about the watertightness issue, let alone the "sewage-in-the-walls" story
  • Counties Manukau District Health Board (CMDHB) didn't mention the issue when it presented to Parliament's health select committee in February
  • this week, former CMDHB chair Lee Mathias told RNZ she didn't know about leaking sewage.
  • The Government also confirms that Middlemore's building problems can be fixed for just $27.5 million, less than 0.28 per cent of its $9.9 billion capital allowance for the next three years and a fraction of $298m spent on Middlemore's new Clinical Services Block.
  • CMDHB also planned to spend $8.6m this financial year extending its innovation hub but not $7.3m to re-clad its children's hospital. Its capital budget has been significantly underspent

JimmyH:

 

It is starting to smell like a political beat-up, which the media are breathlessly reporting without checking up on things first.

 

 

Yes - and an incredibly poorly-executed beat-up at that.  No surprises there.


67 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 6


  Reply # 1995248 13-Apr-2018 10:26
Send private message

6FIEND:

 

JimmyH:

 

Also an interesting take on the story in a Herald column here

 

Even given that Hooton's well known political sympathies, he makes some good points.

 

It is starting to smell like a political beat-up, which the media are breathlessly reporting without checking up on things first.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Agreed.   Here are some of the highlights:

 

  • Middlemore Hospital continues to function, including its highly regarded intensive care and burns units. Would such services continue were sewage really seeping down the walls as implied?
  • no one in authority seems to have been told about the alleged sewage or even the alleged extent of leaky buildings
  • just two-and-a-half weeks ago, new Health Minister David Clark and local MP Louisa Wall also denied being told about the watertightness issue, let alone the "sewage-in-the-walls" story
  • Counties Manukau District Health Board (CMDHB) didn't mention the issue when it presented to Parliament's health select committee in February
  • this week, former CMDHB chair Lee Mathias told RNZ she didn't know about leaking sewage.
  • The Government also confirms that Middlemore's building problems can be fixed for just $27.5 million, less than 0.28 per cent of its $9.9 billion capital allowance for the next three years and a fraction of $298m spent on Middlemore's new Clinical Services Block.
  • CMDHB also planned to spend $8.6m this financial year extending its innovation hub but not $7.3m to re-clad its children's hospital. Its capital budget has been significantly underspent

JimmyH:

 

It is starting to smell like a political beat-up, which the media are breathlessly reporting without checking up on things first.

 

 

Yes - and an incredibly poorly-executed beat-up at that.  No surprises there.

 

 

Yes - and from the previous article

 

"Now the nature of Government is you always get unexpected expenses. This is why Governments normally allow $1.5 billion a year or so of operational allowances to cater for unexpected expenses. The problem Labour has is that they have pre-allocated almost all of their future operational allowances – this is the point Steven Joyce was trying to make.

 

"The mould issue at Middlemore is not a hugely expensive one. An estimate I’ve seen is it might cost $25 million to fix. The Government spends over $70 billion a year.

 

"The previous Government had huge unexpected expenses. $20 billion or so on the Christchurch earthquakes. Hundreds of millions on Kaikoura. Pike River. The Rena cost $50 million etc. To have Labour cry shock and horror because one DHB has an unanticipated expense just shows how unused to governing they are."

 

 


399 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 181


  Reply # 1995446 13-Apr-2018 12:52
One person supports this post
Send private message

StructureDr:

 

"The previous Government had huge unexpected expenses. $20 billion or so on the Christchurch earthquakes. Hundreds of millions on Kaikoura. Pike River. The Rena cost $50 million etc. To have Labour cry shock and horror because one DHB has an unanticipated expense just shows how unused to governing they are."

 

 

Especially ironic given how much Cullen paid for Kiwirail and, by some accounts, deliberately spent down the surplus in the 2008 budget because the writing was on the wall. All the while not thinking to raise beneficiary payments that hadn't been lifted for years.


17937 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5169

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2005243 30-Apr-2018 15:06
2 people support this post
Send private message

Kind of amusing that this started out looking like it was National at fault (according to Labour and Reporting by NZ Media), but yet again just turns out to be Labour failing to do what they were elected to do, plan and execute policy. Instead, it's lying and deflect blame. 




Glurp
7970 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3711

Subscriber

  Reply # 2005247 30-Apr-2018 15:11
Send private message

One propaganda thread isn't enough for you? This one has to be dragged down as well?

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


17937 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5169

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 2005248 30-Apr-2018 15:12
One person supports this post
Send private message

Rikkitic:

 

One propaganda thread isn't enough for you? This one has to be dragged down as well?

 

 

 

 

I'm sorry, shouldn't the truth be present in all threads?

 

 




Glurp
7970 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3711

Subscriber

  Reply # 2005253 30-Apr-2018 15:21
Send private message

Sure, but then it has to be truth. Some of your assertions are backed by reasonably solid fact but some are also just telling whoever will listen for the hundredth time that the government lies and doesn't know how to govern. That is opinion, and not very objective opinion either. The truth in nearly all cases is somewhere in-between the claims and counterclaims. This government has made mistakes. So did the last one. It is not all one or the other.

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.