Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | ... | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | ... | 34
Glurp
8457 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3881

Subscriber

  Reply # 2112831 23-Oct-2018 17:29
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

You suggested something to this effect before but I don't see the comparison you are making. The Labour Party grew out of the union movement. Its purpose was and is to achieve better conditions for working people. No secret has ever been made of this association. There is nothing nefarious about it.

 

Contrast that to the Exclusive Brethren (and undoubted others) providing secret support to Don Brash and who knows who else? I don't see the equivalence at all. 

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


gzt

10261 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1578


  Reply # 2112838 23-Oct-2018 18:11
Send private message quote this post

There is only one NDA I'm aware of and that person is now talking about it. Peter Goodfellow the party president says that was the only allegation of harrasment (and it is non-sexual) that was brought to him in relation to Ross, and that is the one under NDA.

Personally looks to me like a fail that there were so many issues and there was no promoted process to raise those.

696 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 249


  Reply # 2112842 23-Oct-2018 18:24
Send private message quote this post

6FIEND:

 

elpenguino:

 

We also know donors contribute large amounts to the party and then 'wink wink' a relative attends candidate school. Who knows, they just might get on the list.

 

Is that democracy at work ? Do you want a parliament full of the relatives of wealthy people ?

 

I can guess whose interests they'll be working for.

 

 

 

 

Compare and contrast:

 

 

We also know Unions contribute large amounts to the party and then 'wink wink' a representative attends candidate school. Who knows, they just might get on the list.

 

Is that democracy at work ? Do you want a parliament full of Union representatives?

 

I can guess whose interests they'll be working for.

 

 

 

Errrr ordinary working people , like me? Sounds good !!


5216 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2121


  Reply # 2113128 24-Oct-2018 09:58
Send private message quote this post

Rikkitic:

 

You suggested something to this effect before but I don't see the comparison you are making. The Labour Party grew out of the union movement. Its purpose was and is to achieve better conditions for working people. No secret has ever been made of this association. There is nothing nefarious about it.

 

 

 

 

It's still a vested interest.  Whether it's nefarious depends on your view of the behaviour of unions and whether the fact they have so much influence is good or bad for the country.

 

While I know the unions support the labour party I don't actually know how much or what unwritten back room deals may go with that financial support and public endorsement.

 

I do know that ministries with labour minsters are negotiating with unions over salaries and wages.  I also know that former high profile union people end up as candidates/MPs/Ministers.

 

 

 

As an aside I think the union movement are misguided in nailing their colours permanently to just one political party.  Every National government knows the more wages/salaries are paid to union members, the more money/resource Labour has available to contest elections and the more legislation favour unions, the larger their membership is.

 

As a result unions and their members struggle under every National government and always will, and Labour has to play catch-up every time it is in government. 

 

IMO unions would be better to remain politically neutral and work constructively with whoever is in government .

 

 

 

 

 

 





Mike

512 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 224


  Reply # 2113141 24-Oct-2018 10:29
Send private message quote this post

elpenguino:

6FIEND:


elpenguino:


We also know donors contribute large amounts to the party and then 'wink wink' a relative attends candidate school. Who knows, they just might get on the list.


Is that democracy at work ? Do you want a parliament full of the relatives of wealthy people ?


I can guess whose interests they'll be working for.



 


Compare and contrast:



We also know Unions contribute large amounts to the party and then 'wink wink' a representative attends candidate school. Who knows, they just might get on the list.


Is that democracy at work ? Do you want a parliament full of Union representatives?


I can guess whose interests they'll be working for.




Errrr ordinary working people , like me? Sounds good !!



If unions are so representative then why has membership plunged?

93 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 20


  Reply # 2113148 24-Oct-2018 10:44
Send private message quote this post

Don't the Unions actually decide on Labour Party leader if its outside of an election timeframe? I seem to recall the Unions deciding on Andrew little as leader. It seemed very wrong to me at the time and outdated.




13348 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6277

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2113154 24-Oct-2018 10:58
Send private message quote this post

We are drifting off topic, recent posts are probably better placed in the coalition thread.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


7538 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3951


  Reply # 2113158 24-Oct-2018 11:13
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

It's false equivalence / "whataboutism".  The association between the union movement and the Labour Party is long-standing, overt - and suggestions that there's skullduggery involved by some people who don't like the political ideology - or are critical of the behaviour of unions - is a disingenuous argument in my opinion - and off-topic.

 

The criticism of Bridges/National - following the release of the phone conversation - was that there clearly seemed to be a covert process at play, where list seats could be allocated on grounds of race,  as a reward for donations where the donor wasn't identified (in retrospective fact - though clearly a names was disclosed in the conversation, then denied by the alleged donor).  This by a party who've been consistently opposed to any suggestion of using a "quota system" to influence parliamentary representation - to reflect the racial/ethnic or gender balance of the community.  The argument based on the concept that candidates should be selected on merit - and yet here we are - apparent hypocrisy staring us in the face, and distracted by partisan attack politics.

 

There was also another very clear bias discussed - against certain races mentioned.  That was truly outrageous.

 

And this while from a more global/geopolitical viewpoint, there's much more attention being given to alleged attempts by the Chinese Communist Party to exert their influence.  Of course they do - but so does "NZ", pay lobbyists to promote NZ's position on trade in the US for example.  And how can there be an "open" discussion without risk of opening a massive can of worms?  (inciting widespread xenophobia, risking trade relationships etc).  I don't know if there's anything to be concerned about, perhaps we're at risk of being swept up in the present US regime's information war / trade war, perhaps that's based on pure BS.

 

Ardern's also not fond of the concept of tightening up campaign finance laws / political donations, IIRC to paraphrase her "we'd have to get all the details of everybody buying a hotdog at fundraising events".  I don't imagine that trying to prevent foreign political donation would be a simple task, nor if it was decided to ban donations and fund campaigns by government, who gets to decide how the pot of campaign money is divided up between candidates/parties?  What's to stop someone overseas targeting NZ voters via social media campaigns, over which NZ has no real control except to ask people like Zuckerberg to please be nice.


Glurp
8457 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3881

Subscriber

  Reply # 2113161 24-Oct-2018 11:19
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

 

It's false equivalence / "whataboutism".  The association between the union movement and the Labour Party is long-standing, overt - and suggestions that there's skullduggery involved by some people who don't like the political ideology - or are critical of the behaviour of unions - is a disingenuous argument in my opinion - and off-topic.

 

Also, people do have a voice. If they don't like the union influence on Labour, they vote for someone else. If they vote for Labour, clearly they aren't bothered by it (unlike some).

 

 





I reject your reality and substitute my own. - Adam Savage
 


512 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 224


  Reply # 2113178 24-Oct-2018 11:53
Send private message quote this post

Fred99:

It's false equivalence / "whataboutism".  The association between the union movement and the Labour Party is long-standing, overt - and suggestions that there's skullduggery involved by some people who don't like the political ideology - or are critical of the behaviour of unions - is a disingenuous argument in my opinion - and off-topic.



I'm critical because Labour chose to exempt unions from the EFA when it brought it in - a partisan change to electoral law for its own benefit. Skullduggery? Yes. Off topic? Also yes. 😂



13348 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6277

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 2113183 24-Oct-2018 12:06
Send private message quote this post

No peace for Simon Bridges with the latest opinion poll.....

 

 

Preferred Prime Minister:

 

 

 

Jacinda Ardern – 42% (up 2%)
Simon Bridges – 7% (down 3%)
Judith Collins – 5% (up 3%)
Winston Peters – 4% (down 1%)


Party Support:

 

 

 

Labour Party – 45% (up 3%)
National Party – 43% (down 2%)
Green Party – 7% (up 1%)
New Zealand First – 5% (steady)
Maori Party – 1% (steady)

 





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 Mac user, Windows curser, Chrome OS desired.

 

The great divide is the lies from both sides.

 

 


512 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 224


  Reply # 2113185 24-Oct-2018 12:37
Send private message quote this post

Pretty good considering the week. Notable that we did not have any polls during Labour's various episodes recently.

5216 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2121


  Reply # 2113191 24-Oct-2018 13:04
Send private message quote this post

Bluntj:

 

Don't the Unions actually decide on Labour Party leader if its outside of an election timeframe? I seem to recall the Unions deciding on Andrew little as leader. It seemed very wrong to me at the time and outdated.

 

 

Effectively yes because the unions delegates vote as a block, so they effectively decide who gets to be leader.  Interestingly their candidates never thrive. 

 

Labour looked like losing the last election under union-selected former union leader Andrew Little.  Ardern was selected by caucus and has proven a good choice for Labour.

 

Suggests to me that the unions don't really reflect the preferences of potential labour voters.





Mike

696 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 249


  Reply # 2113236 24-Oct-2018 14:27
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

No peace for Simon Bridges with the latest opinion poll.....

 

Preferred Prime Minister:

 

Jacinda Ardern – 42% (up 2%)
Simon Bridges – 7% (down 3%)
Judith Collins – 5% (up 3%)
Winston Peters – 4% (down 1%)


Party Support:

 

Labour Party – 45% (up 3%)
National Party – 43% (down 2%)
Green Party – 7% (up 1%)
New Zealand First – 5% (steady)
Maori Party – 1% (steady)

 

 

7 % !!! Wow there's still people who would vote for him !!

 

Last october Bill English said he was determined to lead a "strong, stable" government but since there there's been one (so far) leadership change and a huge rift with leaks , donor 'irregularities' and cash for candidates.

 

One good thing from all this is national's marketing department will stop trotting out that lazy trite phrase.


916 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 137


  Reply # 2113263 24-Oct-2018 16:02
Send private message quote this post

MikeB4:

 

No peace for Simon Bridges with the latest opinion poll.....

 

Preferred Prime Minister:

 

Jacinda Ardern – 42% (up 2%)
Simon Bridges – 7% (down 3%)
Judith Collins – 5% (up 3%)
Winston Peters – 4% (down 1%)


Party Support:

 

Labour Party – 45% (up 3%)
National Party – 43% (down 2%)
Green Party – 7% (up 1%)
New Zealand First – 5% (steady)
Maori Party – 1% (steady)

 

 

 

 

I've never really got the "preferred Prime Minister" poll?

 

You vote for the party, not the Prime Minister (unless you're in the electorate seat)

 

The numbers above only add up to 58%

 

So 42% don't know or can't be bothered or all other candidates only score 3% or less and aren't shown, which doesn't matter anyway.

 

So what's the point of the poll when you compare it to what people actually vote for (the party they want in Government) on the day?

 

 


1 | ... | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | ... | 34
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.