Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




9011 posts

Uber Geek


# 255728 26-Aug-2019 13:54
Send private message

National Party seems to started campaigning, highlights so far:

 

Drill baby, drill.  Because... why?  It's okay - we know why.
Flog an extra couple of years work out of the elderly - but that's OK, apparently, because Bridges would have to wait an extra couple of years too.
"We'll eliminate two old regulations for every new one we introduce" I wonder where they got that idea?  No - I don't need to wonder - almost verbatim.
Vague promises of tax cuts.
90 day trials reintroduced, despite no evidence at all that they improved employment rates.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
357 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2306579 27-Aug-2019 08:55
One person supports this post
Send private message

90 day trials was never about increasing employemnt opportunities, but instead to make it easier for small(*) businesses to let people go without the normal due process.

 

I feel the National Super is going the wrong way, we should be looking to make eligibilty younger and phase it in to a UBI scheme. I have seen a lot of places where older people are holding on to jobs preventing younger people from being able to move up. This ends up with higher youth unemployment.

 

Arbitrary targets to cut regulations is just plain knee-jerk reactionary rubbish. It neglects the reasons most regulations were introduced in the first place. They say that safety rules are written in blood. Often the reason a regulation exists to prevent certain actions is because someone was doing it and it was causing problems for other people. Sure it is often a good idea to review and revise/update regulations as technologyt changes etc. However just setting a target to cut X many regulations without looking at the bigger picture is problematic. I think they are already seeing issues in the US with the rollback of many regulations under the Trump admin.

 

 

 

Bridges leaning in to the Trump style of politics is a worrying sign for our country. I just hope our voters see through him andsend the message we don't want that sort of thing here.

 

 

 

 

 

*Definition of small is subject to change depending on needs.




9011 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2306626 27-Aug-2019 10:07
Send private message

Varkk:

 

90 day trials was never about increasing employemnt opportunities, but instead to make it easier for small(*) businesses to let people go without the normal due process.

 

*Definition of small is subject to change depending on needs.

 

 

I think as the law stands now, small businesses (<20 employees) can still use 90 day trials anyway.

 

 

 

 

 

 


 
 
 
 


1556 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2306643 27-Aug-2019 10:42
Send private message

Varkk:

 

Bridges leaning in to the Trump style of politics is a worrying sign for our country. I just hope our voters see through him andsend the message we don't want that sort of thing here.

 

 

This is the second time I will point this out, but there is a bombastic Minister in the current government who likes to antagonise businesses, dish out money with little care for official oversight and was photographed in the last election campaign with a 'Put New Zealand First' cap. 

 

If you want to hand-wring about Trump-style populism, maybe try the current coalition partner who think human rights should be dished out by referendum. 

 

But I'm guessing most people are only going to see something if they think National is doing it. 

 

 




9011 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2306676 27-Aug-2019 11:37
Send private message

GV27:

 

Varkk:

 

Bridges leaning in to the Trump style of politics is a worrying sign for our country. I just hope our voters see through him andsend the message we don't want that sort of thing here.

 

 

This is the second time I will point this out, but there is a bombastic Minister in the current government who likes to antagonise businesses, dish out money with little care for official oversight and was photographed in the last election campaign with a 'Put New Zealand First' cap. 

 

 

True, but that's whataboutism.

 

Bridges seems to have embraced a form of neoliberalism that's a mainly discredited relic from the early '90s.  If they want to go full populist, they'll dump him.


1556 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2306720 27-Aug-2019 13:11
Send private message

Fred99:

 

True, but that's whataboutism.

 

Bridges seems to have embraced a form of neoliberalism that's a mainly discredited relic from the early '90s.  If they want to go full populist, they'll dump him.

 

 

Yes, I expected it would be. It generally tends to be when being critical of the current government. 

 

National don't really deserve to govern at this point anyway. Their Wellington MPs are saying they are missing out on infrastructure so Auckland can have Light Rail. The Auckland MPs seem to think people have infinite time and money to waste being stuck in traffic and oppose the 'slow trams' and keep mislabelling it as such. And everyone ignores that the light rail Auckland is supposedly getting at the expense of everyone else is stagnating to the point where even transport activists are vocally pissed off. But it's not a sixteen lane motorway project so National doesn't care.

 

Not good enough. 


SJB

1468 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2307198 28-Aug-2019 11:17
One person supports this post
Send private message

Ardern is outstanding at empathy and useless at everything else. The rest of her team is hopeless at everything.

 

That's one better than National where the whole team is hopeless at everything.

 

And the rest of them? Words fail me.

 

As it stands I won't be voting for anybody.

 

 


1556 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2307217 28-Aug-2019 11:43
Send private message

I wonder if we'll see the shackles come off the Government at the election. There's a few big attention-grabbing things they can do; lift the debt to GDP limit, aggressive write-offs of student loans, etc.

 

We are heading towards a 2005-style election with a muddling National Party and a muddling Labour Party. Huge spend-ups are not out of the question even if someone rules things out now. 


 
 
 
 


195 posts

Master Geek


  # 2307265 28-Aug-2019 13:34
Send private message

GV27:

 

I wonder if we'll see the shackles come off the Government at the election. There's a few big attention-grabbing things they can do; lift the debt to GDP limit, aggressive write-offs of student loans, etc.

 

We are heading towards a 2005-style election with a muddling National Party and a muddling Labour Party. Huge spend-ups are not out of the question even if someone rules things out now. 

 

 

They could fulfill some of the promises made during the last campaign. So many promises made yet so few fulfilled.




9011 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2307967 29-Aug-2019 17:50
One person supports this post
Send private message

SJB:

 

As it stands I won't be voting for anybody.

 

 

I can understand that, but really - don't do it.

 

At least with your party vote, pick the party - any party - that has a central policy issue that does matter to you .

 

As they say, democracy is terrible - but better than any of the alternatives. One fault is that democracy allows a party (or coalition) with less than a majority of eligible voters to claim they have a "mandate" to implement unpopular policy. 


JWR

785 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 2308186 30-Aug-2019 02:29
One person supports this post

Fred99:

 

National Party seems to started campaigning, highlights so far:

 

Drill baby, drill.  Because... why?  It's okay - we know why.
Flog an extra couple of years work out of the elderly - but that's OK, apparently, because Bridges would have to wait an extra couple of years too.
"We'll eliminate two old regulations for every new one we introduce" I wonder where they got that idea?  No - I don't need to wonder - almost verbatim.
Vague promises of tax cuts.
90 day trials reintroduced, despite no evidence at all that they improved employment rates.

 

 

 

 

I agree, there are a few worrying signs there.

 

The one that stands out to me is - "We'll eliminate two old regulations for every new one we introduce".

 

That is just a stupid way to run a country!

 

As taxpayers and voters, I think we should expect smart legislation and not some ridiculous policy based on the amount of it.




9011 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2308231 30-Aug-2019 08:31
Send private message

JWR:

 

The one that stands out to me is - "We'll eliminate two old regulations for every new one we introduce".

 

That is just a stupid way to run a country!

 

 

It's populism - pushed by those who'd benefit most from massive deregulation.  (IOW very unlikely to be you or me, and by people who absolutely do not care about you or me).

 

But they can pick issues where we're all hindered by regulation, annoyances with bureaucracy etc, and they'll be dog whistling and using cherry-picked messages in election manifestos. 


SJB

1468 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2308250 30-Aug-2019 09:09
Send private message

I've been wondering why we are experiencing such a low calibre of politician right around the world these days. Or has it always been like this. Maybe the immediacy and volume of news coverage has exposed the ineptitude of our representatives that was always there.

 

As I posted above I can't think of a single politician here that I hold in high regard or admire and it would be the same if I had stayed in the UK and they have a much larger population to choose from.

 

It's downright depressing.

 

 




9011 posts

Uber Geek


  # 2308259 30-Aug-2019 09:34
One person supports this post
Send private message

Maybe they've always been as bad as they seem today, the difference being that there's constant scrutiny now through social media or even this forum, comparatively less through the traditional media.  Hence great cynicism (as opposed to critical scepticism).

 

There's no doubt in my mind that most politicians get into the game with the genuine belief that they're going to achieve what they consider to be change for the good, but an overwhelming belief in themselves as "born to rule", enabled by people telling them how marvellous they are. Pragmatism dictates that they have to give up something, and it won't willingly be their place in the pecking order.

 

Humility as a virtue seems to be a thing of the past - not just with politicians.  

 

 


SJB

1468 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 2308279 30-Aug-2019 10:00
Send private message

Won't be a problem who's in charge in 50 years. The whole planet will be run by an AI whose persona will change depending on each persons preferences.

 

World peace at last.


195 posts

Master Geek


  # 2308329 30-Aug-2019 11:10
Send private message

Fred99:

 

SJB:

 

As it stands I won't be voting for anybody.

 

 

I can understand that, but really - don't do it.

 

At least with your party vote, pick the party - any party - that has a central policy issue that does matter to you .

 

As they say, democracy is terrible - but better than any of the alternatives. One fault is that democracy allows a party (or coalition) with less than a majority of eligible voters to claim they have a "mandate" to implement unpopular policy. 

 

 

So at election time we do due diligence and decide who to vote for, and because of MMP some minor party like NZ First takes control and changes all the key policies I voted for. Its rubbish.


 1 | 2
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Vodafone integrates eSIM into device and wearable roadmap
Posted 17-Jan-2020 09:45


Do you need this camera app? Group investigates privacy implications
Posted 16-Jan-2020 03:30


JBL launches headphones range designed for gaming
Posted 13-Jan-2020 09:59


Withings introduces ScanWatch wearable combining ECG and sleep apnea detection
Posted 9-Jan-2020 18:34


NZ Police releases public app
Posted 8-Jan-2020 11:43


Suunto 7 combine sports and smart features on new smartwatch generation
Posted 7-Jan-2020 16:06


Intel brings innovation with technology spanning the cloud, network, edge and PC
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:54


AMD announces high performance desktop and ultrathin laptop processors
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:42


AMD unveils four new desktop and mobile GPUs including AMD Radeon RX 5600
Posted 7-Jan-2020 15:32


Consolidation in video streaming market with Spark selling Lightbox to Sky
Posted 19-Dec-2019 09:09


Intel introduces cryogenic control chip to enable quantum computers
Posted 10-Dec-2019 21:32


Vodafone 5G service live in four cities
Posted 10-Dec-2019 08:30


Samsung Galaxy Fold now available in New Zealand
Posted 6-Dec-2019 00:01


NZ company oDocs awarded US$ 100,000 Dubai World Expo grant
Posted 5-Dec-2019 16:00


New Zealand Rugby Selects AWS-Powered Analytics for Deeper Game Insights
Posted 5-Dec-2019 11:33



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.