gzt:quickymart:
How did the "unholy alliance" between Brian Tamaki and "lawyer" Sue Grey come to pass? This article explains why they think they have a good chance in the election this year (lol).
Paywall. A short quote from the article illustrating your main point and the value of the article is always a good thing for more than one reason.
Apologies, I didn't realise it was paywalled (I was reading it at work) - here's a portion of the article and it's an interesting read:
Despite his 2004 claim his church would “rule NZ” by 2008, the Destiny New Zealand Party tanked in the 2005 election, scoring just 14,000 votes. Its most successful electorate candidate got only 1100.
In 2019, Tamaki launched Coalition NZ, saying the new party would be led by his wife Hannah Tamaki and that the pair had been weighing up a move into politics for a number of months.
Later renamed Vision NZ, that party also tanked, earning just 4236 votes in the 2020 election.
Still, Tamaki reckons he’s got a good shot at Parliament in this coming election. Not that he’s had any other shot at Parliament, of course.
“If the public want safety and want someone to do the job ... Then we’ll make a difference.”
That “we” Tamaki’s referring to is a combination of his Freedoms NZ party and the Outdoors Party, previously called the Outdoors and Freedom Party, which is led by Sue Grey. Last election it got 3000 votes.
This seemingly unlikely union of fringe beliefs and religious ideology was Tamaki’s idea, and he says the pair get on like a house on fire.
“We disagree about a lot of things - abortion probably – and we talked about that. We need to join together on what we agree with not what we disagree with and put our differences aside. We both love our country, and we’re doing this for our country.”
Really? He's doing this for...the country?? I thought it was all about his grifti...sorry..."the donations"! 😄