Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
17258 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4930

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 550346 26-Nov-2011 16:47
Send private message

nonprayingmantis, they were addressed in the other thread you were just completely unprepared to accept other points of view on it.

6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 550348 26-Nov-2011 16:50
Send private message

stuzz:
NonprayingMantis: we had a similar discussion in another thread, and lots of people voiced the opinion similar to "you can't complain about the government if you didn't vote" but despite repeated requests, nobody explained to me why this is. Anybody care to explain in this thread?


I guess it could be the opinion, that if you do not exercise your right to vote, then it could be taken that you don't care. Therefore if you don't like what the resulting changes/policies that happen are, then your complaint could fall on deaf ears also.


why? voting is probably one of the least effective things you can do to change policy. if you actually cared about policy then you would spend your time doing something much more effective (like campaigning to persuade other people to vote! :P  )

12597 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5912

Trusted

  Reply # 550349 26-Nov-2011 16:50
Send private message

freitasm: If we see a complaint from you in the next couple of years regarding the party that is in power, then we will come back at you pointing out your own fault.



Not Voting is a valid democratic choice, if you do not see a worthy candidate in your electorate you should not pick any at random, it makes less sense than abstaining.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 550350 26-Nov-2011 16:51
Send private message



networkn: nonprayingmantis, they were addressed in the other thread you were just completely unprepared to accept other points of view on it.


I apologise, I must have missed the explanation.  could you provide a link

2661 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 222

Trusted

  Reply # 550351 26-Nov-2011 16:52
Send private message

If you don't vote then you have no right to moan when the 'wrong' party gets voted in.

Don't vote = You're a Fool.




Check out my LPFM Radio Station at www.thecheese.co.nz cool


17258 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4930

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 550352 26-Nov-2011 16:55
Send private message

NonprayingMantis:

networkn: nonprayingmantis, they were addressed in the other thread you were just completely unprepared to accept other points of view on it.


I apologise, I must have missed the explanation.  could you provide a link


/me senses trolling.

You are welcome to go back to any of the posts I made on the other thread and re-read if you wish. 

6434 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1571


  Reply # 550356 26-Nov-2011 17:06
Send private message

networkn:
NonprayingMantis:

networkn: nonprayingmantis, they were addressed in the other thread you were just completely unprepared to accept other points of view on it.


I apologise, I must have missed the explanation.  could you provide a link


/me senses trolling.

You are welcome to go back to any of the posts I made on the other thread and re-read if you wish. 


I just did.  I didn't see any valid explanations for the idea that if you don't vote, this means you are not allowed to complain about anything the government did.

Okay, let's say you are right, and that voting gives you the right to complain and that is why you should do it.  If the reason for voting is so you can complain about the government, then surely if you vote for the winning government that also removes your right to complain (even more so since not only were you not neutral, you actually supported the party who is doing the stuff you don't like). 

That being the case, it would seem the most sensible voting strategy is to vote for a party you know definitely won't win (say, the legalise cannabis party).  Your vote still won't make any difference whatsoever to the actual result (i.e. the same people will get voted in, and the parties will win the same number of seats), but at least you will have the right to moan about the government in power.  That is the logical outcome of the argument that the reason to vote is so you can complain about the government.

263 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 23


  Reply # 550357 26-Nov-2011 17:08
Send private message

KiwiNZ: Not Voting is a valid democratic choice, if you do not see a worthy candidate in your electorate you should not pick any at random, it makes less sense than abstaining.

I felt that there was a choice for me to vote for but I do sort of agree with the above in that there could be a none-of-the-above or no confidence vote to add to the statistics. So we could split the apathetic/uninformed/unaware from the actively passive in the election results. Just submitting an empty form wouldn't really feel the same I imagine.

BDFL - Memuneh
60790 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 11672

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 550358 26-Nov-2011 17:09
Send private message

I wouldn't say voting gives anyone the rights to complain, or not voting takes the right to complain away.

But I am saying that I reserve my right of not listening or even considering someone's complaints later if the person didn't vote.

Voting is the chance anyone has to try and change the government in a acceptable way.






1598 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  Reply # 550397 26-Nov-2011 19:26
Send private message

codyc1515: What's the point? Tell me who's going to get in: 1) National or 2) Labour. Funny, theres no one else on that list.

Funny how nobody else has replied to this. Can somebody point me to a time when someone other than National or Labour has been "voted" in?

17258 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4930

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 550399 26-Nov-2011 19:37
Send private message

Cody: The point has been mentioned a number of times, its a chance for you to have your say, and based on the polls the only two parties who could lead, are National, which is far and away the most likely, then Labour.

1598 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  Reply # 550400 26-Nov-2011 19:42
Send private message

networkn: Cody: The point has been mentioned a number of times, its a chance for you to have your say, and based on the polls the only two parties who could lead, are National, which is far and away the most likely, then Labour.

So what is the point in voting for any of the smaller parties then?

17258 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4930

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 550403 26-Nov-2011 19:57
Send private message

Because it gives them a proportion of the votes, so they can't LEAD, but they can CONTRIBUTE and perhaps provide some balance to a particularly left or right leading party.. It allows minority views to still be heard.

606 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 38


  Reply # 550405 26-Nov-2011 19:59
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
freitasm: If we see a complaint from you in the next couple of years regarding the party that is in power, then we will come back at you pointing out your own fault.



Not Voting is a valid democratic choice, if you do not see a worthy candidate in your electorate you should not pick any at random, it makes less sense than abstaining.


This is true, not voting is your right, but every voting choice sends a message - including a non vote.

After each election, the parties will analyse voting patterns to determine how each demographic votes and which polices influence their choice.

If you belong to a demographic where only 50% vote, while in another group, over 90% vote, guess which group gets the most attention from the parties when it comes to policy review?

So if you want to send a message to the parties, make sure the message you send isn't "I don't care", because if that is your message, they won't care either.





#include <standard.disclaimer>

17258 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 4930

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 550407 26-Nov-2011 20:01
Send private message

alexx:
KiwiNZ:
freitasm: If we see a complaint from you in the next couple of years regarding the party that is in power, then we will come back at you pointing out your own fault.



Not Voting is a valid democratic choice, if you do not see a worthy candidate in your electorate you should not pick any at random, it makes less sense than abstaining.


This is true, not voting is your right, but every voting choice sends a message - including a non vote.

After each election, the parties will analyse voting patterns to determine how each demographic votes and which polices influence their choice.

If you belong to a demographic where only 50% vote, while in another group, over 90% vote, guess which group gets the most attention from the parties when it comes to policy review?

So if you want to send a message to the parties, make sure the message you send isn't "I don't care", because if that is your message, they won't care either.



That is a great point you make alexx despite knowing it, it hadn't occurred to point it out. 

PrayingMantis that is a reason to vote regardless!
 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.