Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3
kingjj
Baby Get Shaky!
1678 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #462645 26-Apr-2011 17:46
Send private message

rscole86:
kingjj:
bnapi:  I'm surprised the police didn't get the passengers out of the taxi as it was not their vehicle and the penalty is a fine.


The Police wouldn't remove the people if they are lawful customers with intent to pay. A taxi driver refusing a fare is a civil issue not a criminal issue. The Police would only be there to keep the peace and/or broker an agreement. 


IIRC Police do have the power to issue an infringement against a Taxi driver/operator for failing to take passengers. Also there are other NZTA enforcement officers (which police are part of) who can also issue infringements or start proceedings against, through the courts if required.


I will check up on that tomorrow, happy to be corrected. I was focusing more on the customer getting removed, not the fine to taxi driver. 

rscole86
4411 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #462657 26-Apr-2011 18:01
Send private message

Land Transport Rule: Operator Licensing 2007 [700kb pdf]


3.3(2) A driver may refuse to accept a hire if:
(a) the hirer has failed to pay the fare due for a previous hire and that fare is not paid before the commencement of the
new hire; or
(b) the driver has sought prepayment of the fare but has been refused; or
(c) the vehicle is being used in a registered service, and the prospective hire is not consistent with that service.


4.4(2) A taxi driver must, subject to 3.3(1), 3.3(2), 4.4(4), and 4.4(5), accept:
(a) any hiring offered while the vehicle is available for hire; and
(b) the hirer as a passenger and any other person that the hirer may require the driver to accept, up to the maximum
number prescribed by the certificate of loading or the number of seats provided (whichever is the lesser).


A breach of 4.4(2) above can result in,

4.4(2) Taxi driver, while available for hire, must, with certain exceptions, accept any offered hire and passenger up to the prescribed maximum [source]

Body Corporate conviction $1,000
Individal conviction $5,000
Individual Infringement $200
Body Corporate Infringement $1,000http://nzta.thomsonreuters.co.nz/DLEG-NZL-LTSA-T.LTR-81001.pdf

 
 
 
 


kingjj
Baby Get Shaky!
1678 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #462659 26-Apr-2011 18:04
Send private message

rscole86: Land Transport Rule: Operator Licensing 2007


3.3(2) A driver may refuse to accept a hire if:
(a) the hirer has failed to pay the fare due for a previous hire and that fare is not paid before the commencement of the
new hire; or
(b) the driver has sought prepayment of the fare but has been refused; or
(c) the vehicle is being used in a registered service, and the prospective hire is not consistent with that service.


4.4(2) A taxi driver must, subject to 3.3(1), 3.3(2), 4.4(4), and 4.4(5), accept:
(a) any hiring offered while the vehicle is available for hire; and
(b) the hirer as a passenger and any other person that the hirer may require the driver to accept, up to the maximum
number prescribed by the certificate of loading or the number of seats provided (whichever is the lesser).


A breach of 4.4(2) above can result in,

4.4(2) Taxi driver, while available for hire, must, with certain exceptions, accept any offered hire and passenger up to the prescribed maximum

Body Corporate conviction $1,000
Individal conviction $5,000
Individual Infringement $200
Body Corporate Infringement $1,000


Choice, makes it nice and clear. 

rscole86
4411 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #462663 26-Apr-2011 18:07
Send private message

I have omitted the fact that Taxi drivers can refuse people based on them being intoxicated, eating, disturbing the peace, or prepayment has been refused by hirer. (plus others)

billgates
4240 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #462672 26-Apr-2011 18:16
Send private message

valtam:
billgates: If you want short trips and every passenger served then maybe the taxi association should make minimum bill to be $10 no matter what the distance covered is.


wtf...clearly you're ignorant of the disabled and elderly that frequently are in need of short trips to essential services. Good luck with your fascist state.


It's not so hard or difficult to have exceptions in your business. I guess you would be more that happy to pay for the elderly's min payment to the taxi drivers. What's that you are saying that 'why should I pay?' but you expect the taxi drivers to absord the costs. It's a business in the end. It's up to them to decide what's best for their business. If one company will not offer discounts to elderly's or disabled then another will.




Do whatever you want to do man.

  

valtam
384 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #462694 26-Apr-2011 18:51
Send private message

billgates: I guess you would be more that happy to pay for the elderly's min payment to the taxi drivers. What's that you are saying that 'why should I pay?'


Pulling assumptions out of thin air does not help to strengthen your argument. If you're in a service related business, you cannot discriminate based on the grounds of 'whats best for your business' unless as previously mentioned the customer has in some way breached the law in which case the taxi has every right to refuse a passengers business. If you refuse service, be prepared to defend your 'whats best for your business' position in a court of law. I doubt any Judge will back you on those grounds.




Support a locally made Linux based Operating System, try Linux Lite.
Download Linux Lite

oxnsox
1923 posts

Uber Geek


  #462696 26-Apr-2011 18:52
Send private message

The simple solution would be to go to the Cab at the back of the queue... He has the least to loose (in terms of his place) and gets a fare.

Surely the hirer has the right to choose which Taxi they want, for whatever reason.


 
 
 
 


kobiak
1452 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #462712 26-Apr-2011 19:36
Send private message

I love my $3-4 rides from supermarket with full bags in Auckland central :) never had an issuee with drivers in fact most supermarkets have free taxi call service :)




helping others at evgenyk.nz


MikeB4
15555 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #462742 26-Apr-2011 20:53
Send private message

This is not new regulations for the industry. All taxi owners know it when they enter the business. Quite simple if they feel they cannot comply with the rules governing the business don't enter it or don't stay in it.

billgates
4240 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #462750 26-Apr-2011 21:20
Send private message

valtam:
billgates: I guess you would be more that happy to pay for the elderly's min payment to the taxi drivers. What's that you are saying that 'why should I pay?'


Pulling assumptions out of thin air does not help to strengthen your argument. If you're in a service related business, you cannot discriminate based on the grounds of 'whats best for your business' unless as previously mentioned the customer has in some way breached the law in which case the taxi has every right to refuse a passengers business. If you refuse service, be prepared to defend your 'whats best for your business' position in a court of law. I doubt any Judge will back you on those grounds.



what assumptions? I am not contesting the law. I am saying that Taxi federation need to sort out something for the taxi drivers.  




Do whatever you want to do man.

  

BlakJak
794 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #462760 26-Apr-2011 21:29
Send private message

billgates, did you notice the law?

Seems cut and dried if you ask me.




No signature to see here, move along...

valtam
384 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #462768 26-Apr-2011 21:48
Send private message

bill thinks that, and I quote 'the taxi association should make minimum bill to be $10 no matter what the distance covered is' that ladies and gentlemen, reeks of fail on a number of levels. Now he is trying to back pedal by saying in more general terms what should happen.




Support a locally made Linux based Operating System, try Linux Lite.
Download Linux Lite

billgates
4240 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #462769 26-Apr-2011 21:48
Send private message

BlakJak: billgates, did you notice the law?

Seems cut and dried if you ask me.


Yes I did and I am not contesting it. I am saying that perhaps taxi drivers will stop refusing short runs if the min flag fall rate went up or if a min charge to the customer is setup.   




Do whatever you want to do man.

  

billgates
4240 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #462774 26-Apr-2011 21:50
Send private message

valtam: bill thinks that, and I quote 'the taxi association should make minimum bill to be $10 no matter what the distance covered is' that ladies and gentlemen, reeks of fail on a number of levels. Now he is trying to back pedal by saying in more general terms what should happen.



You obviously have no sense of arguing with someone using manners. Not going to bother with you anymore.  




Do whatever you want to do man.

  

1080p
1332 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #462855 27-Apr-2011 08:23
Send private message

I feel for the cab drivers on this one. Putting yourself in their shoes, I can see many here would be pissed at being forced to make short trips for peanuts just in the same way you don't want to do the hard yards for a small reward in your respective industries.

I really do think that the minimum fare should be set at $10 and subtract that $10 fee if the total fare passes $10, for example.

This really is a good solution. The taxi driver is guaranteed a reasonable fare and I doubt customers will have any issues with drivers refusing to play ball.

The fact that this service has been legislated is garbage. I am sure shopkeepers would not be happy if the law said they had to accept any sized payment via credit card, for example. I believe any service provider should have the right to refuse service. Those that do not are guaranteed to get more business.

1 | 2 | 3
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Huawei launches IdeaHub Pro in New Zealand
Posted 27-Oct-2020 16:41


Southland-based IT specialist providing virtual services worldwide
Posted 27-Oct-2020 15:55


NASA discovers water on sunlit surface of Moon
Posted 27-Oct-2020 08:30


Huawei introduces new features to Petal Search, Maps and Docs
Posted 26-Oct-2020 18:05


Nokia selected by NASA to build first ever cellular network on the Moon
Posted 21-Oct-2020 08:34


Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS16211+
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13


Teletrac Navman launches integrated multi-camera solution for transport and logistics industry
Posted 8-Oct-2020 10:57


Farmside hits 10,000 RBI customers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 15:32









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.