Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 
timmmay
16510 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #462859 27-Apr-2011 08:33
Send private message

billgates: What is the flagfall? Is it not like $2 or $3? So a taxi driver gets $6 for the trip in total as per the NZHerald article, comes back to the back in the taxi queue, waits for so many more miniutes again before he/she gets their turn again and might only end up making another short trip making peantus again. I am with the taxi drivers on this one. If you want short trips and every passenger served then maybe the taxi association should make minimum bill to be $10 no matter what the distance covered is.


I agree. Taxis are a business, with some public responsibility. If they want to raise the flagfall to $10 and include more distance that'd be fine with me. There could be a scheme for the elderly or disabled to perhaps help them get where they need to during off peak times.

Taxis in New Zealand are already quite expensive compared with many of the countries i've been in, including Australia.

valtam: wtf...clearly you're ignorant of the disabled and elderly that frequently are in need of short trips to essential services. Good luck with your fascist state.


Your post comes off as a personal attack, i'm surprised Mauricio or a moderator hasn't already given you some kind of a warning.

freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
68816 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #462867 27-Apr-2011 08:45
Send private message

I didn't read it as that, more like. An attack on a model suggested by another use.




 

 

These links are referral codes

 

Geekzone broadband switch | Eletricity comparison and switch | Hatch investment (NZ$ 10 bonus if NZ$100 deposited within 30 days) | Sharesies | Mighty Ape | Backblaze | Coinbase | TheMarket | My technology disclosure


 
 
 
 


cr250bromo
222 posts

Master Geek


  #462900 27-Apr-2011 09:43
Send private message

Taxis already can set their fares to anything they want, as long as their fare schedule is displayed clearly on the outside of their taxi and notified to Land Transport.

So if these short trips are a problem they could modify their fare schedule accordingly. However I haven't seen any evidence of this happening yet.

valtam
384 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #462913 27-Apr-2011 10:21
Send private message

freitasm: I didn't read it as that, more like. An attack on a model suggested by another use.


Correct, I merely opposed the idea of a minimum charging model and compared that as a fascist like implementation. 




Support a locally made Linux based Operating System, try Linux Lite.
Download Linux Lite

floydbloke
2295 posts

Uber Geek


  #462931 27-Apr-2011 10:50
Send private message

rscole86: Land Transport Rule: Operator Licensing 2007 [700kb pdf]


3.3(2) A driver may refuse to accept a hire if:
(a) the hirer has failed to pay the fare due for a previous hire and that fare is not paid before the commencement of the
new hire; or
(b) the driver has sought prepayment of the fare but has been refused; or
(c) the vehicle is being used in a registered service, and the prospective hire is not consistent with that service.


I'm a bit surprised about B above.  Also not sure how it would work for metered fares, as most of them are.  I guess the passenger could pay the extra or the driver refund the difference if there is a discrepancy once the destination is reached.




= > ÷

 

 


Geese
1267 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #462968 27-Apr-2011 12:08
Send private message

To become a taxi driver, they should have to complete a stint doing pizza delivery. Then, as a taxi driver, they would be grateful to receive a minimum fare!

Dratsab
3596 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #463010 27-Apr-2011 13:34
Send private message

floydbloke:
rscole86: Land Transport Rule: Operator Licensing 2007 [700kb pdf]


3.3(2) A driver may refuse to accept a hire if:
(a) the hirer has failed to pay the fare due for a previous hire and that fare is not paid before the commencement of the
new hire; or
(b) the driver has sought prepayment of the fare but has been refused; or
(c) the vehicle is being used in a registered service, and the prospective hire is not consistent with that service.


I'm a bit surprised about B above.  Also not sure how it would work for metered fares, as most of them are.  I guess the passenger could pay the extra or the driver refund the difference if there is a discrepancy once the destination is reached.

It's something taxi drivers can insist on if they think their passenger is dodgy and may try and do runner instead of paying. Nothing new and I can think of at least one occasion where a taxi driver has been attacked for making such a request.

The legislation is in place (as quoted by rscole86) and taxi drivers know it. If they're going to break the existing laws, they face the prospect of receiving a fine. Pure and simple, cut and dried, end of story, black and white: call it what you like...

If they want something done about it, they need their association(s) to lobby parliament. For those who don't like it, tough. It is what it is.

 
 
 
 


NonprayingMantis
6434 posts

Uber Geek


  #463028 27-Apr-2011 14:14
Send private message

If the problem centres around taxis waiting in a queue and drivers being annoyed about losing their place in the queue for $4, then the solution is simple.
Allow drivers to refuse short fares if they wish, but allow people to take a taxi from the back of the queue of the drivers in front refuse the fare. The drivers at the front might refuse if the fare is too short, but the driver at the back has less to lose from accepting a short fare. He can drive off and because the fare is short he will not lose many (if any) places in the queue.

Handle9
4747 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #463118 27-Apr-2011 18:47
Send private message

billgates: If you want short trips and every passenger served then maybe the taxi association should make minimum bill to be $10 no matter what the distance covered is.


Unless it's done by regulation (ie the government) that would be price fixing / cartel behaviour and subject to prosecution by the Commerce Commission.

nigelj
856 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #463141 27-Apr-2011 20:04
Send private message

floydbloke:
rscole86: Land Transport Rule: Operator Licensing 2007 [700kb pdf]

(b) the driver has sought prepayment of the fare but has been refused; or


I'm a bit surprised about B above.  Also not sure how it would work for metered fares, as most of them are.  I guess the passenger could pay the extra or the driver refund the difference if there is a discrepancy once the destination is reached.


As I recall, they can do it based on an estimation (ask for a $50 prepayment to cover the typical fare as a prepayment) and then settle the metered balance at the end (i.e. refund the overpaid $10, or ask for the remaining $5.50)

sbiddle
29269 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #463143 27-Apr-2011 20:16
Send private message

timmmay: Taxis in New Zealand are already quite expensive compared with many of the countries i've been in, including Australia.



It's also interesting to see the big variances in pricing.

In Wellington for example the chapest taxi company is $2.35 per km, with a flag fall of around $2.50

Wellington Combined (the biggest company) charge around $2.75 per km (off the top of my head). Many of the smaller taxi companies in Wellington are charging around $3.30 + per km - some are even more expensive than Corporate who offer an upmarket service and don't drive around in 10yr old second hand cars.

oxnsox
1923 posts

Uber Geek


  #463216 28-Apr-2011 08:36
Send private message

Soo if there is quite a variation in pricing on 'standard' fares, what is actually stopping the taxi companies (or even individual drivers) putting up a card with a Minimum Fare on it when they don't want small fares....

But isn't this a supply and demand issue. The Cabbies all park in the same hotspot looking for the big fares.... and it simply attracts lots of short fares because folk say 'look at all the taxis, lets just grab one of them for our ride up the road'

It really is a problem of there own making

bazzer
3316 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #463241 28-Apr-2011 09:07
Send private message

NonprayingMantis: If the problem centres around taxis waiting in a queue and drivers being annoyed about losing their place in the queue for $4, then the solution is simple.
Allow drivers to refuse short fares if they wish, but allow people to take a taxi from the back of the queue of the drivers in front refuse the fare. The drivers at the front might refuse if the fare is too short, but the driver at the back has less to lose from accepting a short fare. He can drive off and because the fare is short he will not lose many (if any) places in the queue.

Can't you take any taxi you like in New Zealand?  There aren't any rules about having to take the first taxi on the rank here are there?

timmmay
16510 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #463257 28-Apr-2011 09:39
Send private message

AFAIK you can take any taxi you like. In Dublin they were strict about making you take the first cab on the rank and not being flagged down while they were moving, but here you do what you like.

rscole86
4410 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #464125 1-May-2011 11:59
Send private message

timmmay: AFAIK you can take any taxi you like. In Dublin they were strict about making you take the first cab on the rank and not being flagged down while they were moving, but here you do what you like.


Correct, and they must also accept that fare.

1 | 2 | 3 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News »

Nanoleaf enhances lighting line with launch of Triangles and Mini Triangles
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:18


Synology unveils DS1621+ 
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:12


Ingram Micro introduces FootfallCam to New Zealand channel
Posted 17-Oct-2020 20:06


Dropbox adopts Virtual First working policy
Posted 17-Oct-2020 19:47


OPPO announces Reno4 Series 5G line-up in NZ
Posted 16-Oct-2020 08:52


Microsoft Highway to a Hundred expands to Asia Pacific
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:34


Spark turns on 5G in Auckland
Posted 14-Oct-2020 09:29


AMD Launches AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Desktop Processors
Posted 9-Oct-2020 10:13


Teletrac Navman launches integrated multi-camera solution for transport and logistics industry
Posted 8-Oct-2020 10:57


Farmside hits 10,000 RBI customers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 15:32


NordVPN starts deploying colocated servers
Posted 7-Oct-2020 09:00


Google introduces Nest Wifi routers in New Zealand
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Orcon to bundle Google Nest Wifi router with new accounts
Posted 7-Oct-2020 05:00


Epay and Centrapay partner to create digital gift cards
Posted 2-Oct-2020 17:34


Inseego launches 5G MiFi M2000 mobile hotspot
Posted 2-Oct-2020 14:53









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.