![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Octopus Energy ($50 Credit) | Tesla | Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
michaelmurfy: @magesnz you may be running into the same issue as I did with IPv6 not getting provisioned fully for some reason. @quic can investigate and resolve for you. I’ll hit up somebody also.
Edit: they’ll take a look on Monday. Considering your configuration looks OK this may be the case. Don’t panic 😊
thank you Michael , this was unexpected, I didn’t know what to expect about my issue, I thought I would be on my own of having to go through my logs and trying to find the source of my issue, the people on this forum are absolutely wonderful, and is helping me grow as an It engineer at the same time
magesnz:
michaelmurfy: @magesnz you may be running into the same issue as I did with IPv6 not getting provisioned fully for some reason. @quic can investigate and resolve for you. I’ll hit up somebody also.
Edit: they’ll take a look on Monday. Considering your configuration looks OK this may be the case. Don’t panic 😊
thank you Michael , this was unexpected, I didn’t know what to expect about my issue, I thought I would be on my own of having to go through my logs and trying to find the source of my issue, the people on this forum are absolutely wonderful, and is helping me grow as an It engineer at the same time
You're never alone on these platforms if your query is valid. It may not be instant but there are a lot of people willing to help.
Welcome aboard
Referral Link Quic
Free Setup use R502152EQH6OK on check out
magesnz:
having to go through my logs and trying to find the source of my issue,
Probably. Unless the ISP has simple known problems, there is usually some form of fault finding to do. Up until now I have assumed there was a configuration issue (and I would continue to take this position until there was evidence to support there being a problem).
If we wind back one step, the PPP session should have negotiated IPv6 (via IPv6CP). Did that happen? If it did happen, then the next step is DHCPv6 using link local addresses (where the host part of those IPv6 link local addresses is mentioned in the IPv6CP part of the ppp.log). This is from my last ppp.log. The lines that are relavant from this log have 'IPV6CP' as a prefix.
[wan] IPV6CP: Open event
[wan] IPV6CP: state change Initial --> Starting
[wan] IPV6CP: LayerStart
[wan] IPCP: Up event
[wan] IPCP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent
[wan] IPCP: SendConfigReq #1
[wan] IPADDR 0.0.0.0
[wan] COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid
[wan] IPV6CP: Up event
[wan] IPV6CP: state change Starting --> Req-Sent
[wan] IPV6CP: SendConfigReq #1
[wan] IPCP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Req-Sent)
[wan] IPADDR 103.139.184.xx
[wan] 103.139.184.xx is OK
[wan] IPCP: SendConfigAck #1
[wan] IPADDR 103.139.184.xx
[wan] IPCP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent
[wan] IPV6CP: rec'd Configure Request #1 (Req-Sent)
[wan] IPV6CP: SendConfigAck #1
[wan] IPV6CP: state change Req-Sent --> Ack-Sent
[wan_link0] rec'd unexpected protocol MPLS Control Protocol (RFC 3032), rejecting
[wan] IPCP: rec'd Configure Reject #1 (Ack-Sent)
[wan] COMPPROTO VJCOMP, 16 comp. channels, no comp-cid
[wan] IPCP: SendConfigReq #2
[wan] IPADDR 0.0.0.0
[wan] IPV6CP: rec'd Configure Ack #1 (Ack-Sent)
[wan] IPV6CP: state change Ack-Sent --> Opened
[wan] IPV6CP: LayerUp
[wan] 0208:a2ff:fe0f:6b8f -> 0000:0000:00f0:1016
michaelmurfy: @magesnz you may be running into the same issue as I did with IPv6 not getting provisioned fully for some reason. @quic can investigate and resolve for you. I’ll hit up somebody also.
Edit: they’ll take a look on Monday. Considering your configuration looks OK this may be the case. Don’t panic 😊
Cheers @michaelmurfy.
While we thought it was an outlier, I've just updated your IPv6 subnet @magesnz. Give that a try now.
You'll see both your old and new subnet in the portal currently (but only the new will be pushed down to you) until automation takes the old one away when it does a cleanup.
Quic Broadband
quic.nz - The telco who puts you in charge!
quic:
michaelmurfy: @magesnz you may be running into the same issue as I did with IPv6 not getting provisioned fully for some reason. @quic can investigate and resolve for you. I’ll hit up somebody also.
Edit: they’ll take a look on Monday. Considering your configuration looks OK this may be the case. Don’t panic 😊
Cheers @michaelmurfy.
While we thought it was an outlier, I've just updated your IPv6 subnet @magesnz. Give that a try now.
You'll see both your old and new subnet in the portal currently (but only the new will be pushed down to you) until automation takes the old one away when it does a cleanup.
Thank you so much @quic, that was so fast and unexpected especially on this matariki day , i hope you guys can enjoy the holiday like everyone else, and thank you to @michaelmurfy, @gregb and @hsvhel for your precious assistance and help, hopefully we can make @quic continue to grow as an isp as well helping each other with our issues
have a wonderful day
Currently with Orcon and thinking to switch. Is the transfer seamless? I’m currently on 1gig but I have the Nokia Hyperfibre ont. how’s quic performance in terms of gaming and latency?
maveric:
Currently with Orcon and thinking to switch. Is the transfer seamless? I’m currently on 1gig but I have the Nokia Hyperfibre ont. how’s quic performance in terms of gaming and latency?
when I switched from spark, they didn’t cancel my service, I just had to switch port on my ont to port 2, and they activated my service inside 12h since I’m not on chorus but on ultra fast fibre since I’m in Waikato, it took this long and they changed to port no2 because spark was already active on port 1
maveric:Currently with Orcon and thinking to switch. Is the transfer seamless? I’m currently on 1gig but I have the Nokia Hyperfibre ont. how’s quic performance in terms of gaming and latency?
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Octopus Energy ($50 Credit) | Tesla | Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
I recently moved to Quic
I have issues with bad ping to NA servers. I have about 240 league of legends when League of Legends NA.
I have to resort to MudFish to fix this which makes the ping about 170.
Anyone else having this issue or is this just me.
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Octopus Energy ($50 Credit) | Tesla | Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
@michaelmurfy A friend of mine with 2Degrees gets about 160 ping.
Furthermore, My ping a couple days ago was about 150 without mudfish.
Seems to be the same route when i captured the discrepancy.
-
Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Octopus Energy ($50 Credit) | Tesla | Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.
michaelmurfy: @alpay456 as I said this happens with every single provider. A provider can’t directly control their routes once the traffic leaves their network and also ICMP is deprioritised on routers out on the internet so may not be entirely accurate. Unless if you’re noticing actual performance issues with the game just enjoy it…
There is nothing wrong here. It’s just the internet working as expected. No provider states you’re going to ever get the lowest possible latency to any service and this is always best effort no matter what provider you’re with.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |