HyperFibre - expected speed results

Forums › Quic › HyperFibre - expected speed results

1 | 2 | 3

3l3m3nt

105 posts

Master Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3253345 26-Jun-2024 09:54

Looks pretty consistent now! Nice :)

I also find that different speedtest servers yield different results. I think once you crack the 1Gbps+ mark, you can start to see the nuances of different speedtest servers. Some are terrible!

Dunedin, NZ
Quic Broadband | Rocket 2G Hyperfibre
Dunedin Live Webcam (4K) | Quic Smokepings

Referral Links:
Quic (use R282731EPGJMG on checkout for free setup, and to help me pay for my fast internet addiction)
Contact Energy (use FRTDD2R for $100 credit)

Samsung

Shop now on Samsung (affiliate link).

michaelmurfy

meow
13166 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3253497 26-Jun-2024 14:41

chriscal:

Would you look at that, you can see where I made the change last night. Will see how it goes over the next few days. Nice one @3l3m3nt!

I also just noticed you were testing at the exact same time as me (also on Hyperfibre) potentially to the same server (Vetta Auckland). I've just now changed my testing time to something else to not clash.

Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.

chriscal

26 posts

Geek

#3253583 26-Jun-2024 19:11

3l3m3nt:

Hey - on your linux host, try some sysctl tweaks. I found this helped heaps..

net.core.default_qdisc = fq_codel
net.core.rmem_max = 82501632
net.core.wmem_max = 82501632
net.core.rmem_default = 1048576
net.core.wmem_default = 1048576
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 250000
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 1024 64999
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control = bbr
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 131072 82501632
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 16384 82501632
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf = 1

Might be worth adding this to the discord tips channel, certainly improved things for me.

Mikek

104 posts

Master Geek

#3253636 26-Jun-2024 19:59

So for you guys when using windows speedtest app and testing to Chorus, Devoli, Feenix & Mercury What speeds do you guys up & down ?

Anyone able to show some results ?

gabesmith

46 posts

Geek

Trusted

#3253680 26-Jun-2024 23:32

@ssamjh how do you change between bng1-akl1 and bng2-akl2 ? Is this route dependent or luck of the draw when reconnecting Router/ONT?

@michaelmurfy re Discord - yeah I am lurking in there, very active and lots of banter which is good to see.

@Mikek re IPv4 and IPv6 speedtests - my tests to Chorus Fibre Lab are similar with either - my testing approach is to block either protocol for my desktop on Mikrotik FWs

Hoping the Quic maintenance upgrades tonight are going to help things for me in Wellington.... Talk of a Quic Wellington PoP in the future which will also help I am sure.

Thanks, Gabe

ssamjh

339 posts

Ultimate Geek

ID Verified

Trusted

#3253688 27-Jun-2024 00:13

gabesmith:
@ssamjh how do you change between bng1-akl1 and bng2-akl2 ? Is this route dependent or luck of the draw when reconnecting Router/ONT?

@michaelmurfy re Discord - yeah I am lurking in there, very active and lots of banter which is good to see.

@Mikek re IPv4 and IPv6 speedtests - my tests to Chorus Fibre Lab are similar with either - my testing approach is to block either protocol for my desktop on Mikrotik FWs

Hoping the Quic maintenance upgrades tonight are going to help things for me in Wellington.... Talk of a Quic Wellington PoP in the future which will also help I am sure.

Thanks, Gabe

Yep BNG is a luck based thing.
But ideally both will be good after this maintainence.

Whitianga, Coromandel - Quic Sprinter - Ref (free setup): R893192EGADLZ

Smokeping: Quic / Voyager / Starlink

Coromandel Webcam Network