![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
networkn:NZtechfreak:The Bose QC15 is very highly regarded as a noise cancelling headphone.
As well they should be for that money! They are so pasticky and feel really junky though is my main concern.
alasta:networkn:NZtechfreak:The Bose QC15 is very highly regarded as a noise cancelling headphone.
As well they should be for that money! They are so pasticky and feel really junky though is my main concern.
I have used the QC15 and the noise cancelling effectiveness is undoubtedly a lot better than my Sennheiser PXC-250s, and I didn't think the build quality was too bad.
Unfortunately the sound quality was disappointing compared with any of my Sennheiser sets which are much brighter and more detailed while still sounding authentic. I don't find Bose gear quite as bad as some of the hysterics make out, but you can do much better at the same or even a lower price point.
NZtechfreak:alasta:networkn:NZtechfreak:The Bose QC15 is very highly regarded as a noise cancelling headphone.
As well they should be for that money! They are so pasticky and feel really junky though is my main concern.
I have used the QC15 and the noise cancelling effectiveness is undoubtedly a lot better than my Sennheiser PXC-250s, and I didn't think the build quality was too bad.
Unfortunately the sound quality was disappointing compared with any of my Sennheiser sets which are much brighter and more detailed while still sounding authentic. I don't find Bose gear quite as bad as some of the hysterics make out, but you can do much better at the same or even a lower price point.
Can you do much better in an active noise cancelling headphone though? No idea myself, just wondering out loud since those are the only ones I've seen people in audiophile forums have any kind words for.
Is it possible you're just not into their sound, since the Sennheiser sound and brightness seem very much to your liking? Sometimes brightness is equated to detail retrieval, but they aren't necessarily synonymous.
NZtechfreak:alasta: I have used the QC15 and the noise cancelling effectiveness is undoubtedly a lot better than my Sennheiser PXC-250s, and I didn't think the build quality was too bad.
Unfortunately the sound quality was disappointing compared with any of my Sennheiser sets which are much brighter and more detailed while still sounding authentic. I don't find Bose gear quite as bad as some of the hysterics make out, but you can do much better at the same or even a lower price point.
Can you do much better in an active noise cancelling headphone though? No idea myself, just wondering out loud since those are the only ones I've seen people in audiophile forums have any kind words for.
Is it possible you're just not into their sound, since the Sennheiser sound and brightness seem very much to your liking? Sometimes brightness is equated to detail retrieval, but they aren't necessarily synonymous.
alasta: I agree with Geekiegeek above. If you're a layman listening to a Bose product for the first time they're actually quite good, but when I compare the Bose to the Sennheiser I notice quite a striking difference that goes beyond just personal taste in my view.
networkn: Hi There!
I'd be interested in an upgrade to my Sens HD 555's if someone wanted to make a recommendation.
networkn: Hi There!
I'd be interested in an upgrade to my Sens HD 555's if someone wanted to make a recommendation.
NZtechfreak:networkn: Hi There!
I'd be interested in an upgrade to my Sens HD 555's if someone wanted to make a recommendation.
Mwoar info required!
You want full-sized cans?
Is sound isolation important?
What genres do you listen to?
What sources are you playing from? Do you have a headphone amplifier, are you listening to lots of lossy music?
What things did you like and dislike about your present headphones? In other words, what would you like your new headphone to retain and improve upon?
...and, importantly, budget? If no budget is specified I'm just going to recommend the Stax SR-009 :p
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |