Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




3 posts

Wannabe Geek


Topic # 25840 3-Sep-2008 10:38
Send private message

Hi all. I just got Sky HDi installed the other day and I really like it but the channel selection really is quite poor.

Does anyone know why Sky doesnt have more HD channels available? Is it something to do with licensing?
 
The Aussie HD service Foxtel HD+ has BBC HD, Discovery HD, National Geographic HD, ESPN HD, a movie and another sport channel in HD.

Adding discovery & national geographic HD would make Sky HDi much more worth while.

Create new topic
1806 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 271

Subscriber

  Reply # 161786 3-Sep-2008 10:59
Send private message

Fellet is getting HD bandwidth FREE for 1 year from Optus. He wants to add (instead of putting Prime in HD) either Discovery or National Geographic in HD but also wants to simulcast the HD version in SD. Disc/NG won't agree as both have different SD feeds. All to do with keeping the service cheap unless they get large uptake of customers after 1 year.

EDIT: National Geographic HD/Discovery HD provision is dependent on 45 Mbps fibre feed from place of distribution, being Hong Kong/Singapore respectively.




Ross

 

Spark FibreMAX using Mikrotik CCR1009-8G-1S-1S+

 


Speed Test


Awesome
4780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 161790 3-Sep-2008 11:06
Send private message

And let's not forget probably the biggest reason we do not have more HD channels: Transponder space is limited, which also makes it expensive. HD obviously has much higher bandwidth requirements than SD, so for every HD channel you are broadcasting, that is about 3 SD channels you cant.

 
 
 
 




3 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 161792 3-Sep-2008 11:09
Send private message

Well, hopefully Sky get lots of new HDi subscribers so we can get more channels then lol

176 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 161793 3-Sep-2008 11:11
Send private message

adamj: And let's not forget probably the biggest reason we do not have more HD channels: Transponder space is limited, which also makes it expensive. HD obviously has much higher bandwidth requirements than SD, so for every HD channel you are broadcasting, that is about 3 SD channels you cant.


Vibe, Alt and Food TV.... theres 3 you could lose without annoying me. complete rubbish.... lets not even get mention C4's new programming

(tongue in cheek, of coarse, but i still think they're a waste of bandwidth)

Awesome
4780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 161796 3-Sep-2008 11:17
Send private message

testing123:
adamj: And let's not forget probably the biggest reason we do not have more HD channels: Transponder space is limited, which also makes it expensive. HD obviously has much higher bandwidth requirements than SD, so for every HD channel you are broadcasting, that is about 3 SD channels you cant.


Vibe, Alt and Food TV.... theres 3 you could lose without annoying me. complete rubbish.... lets not even get mention C4's new programming

(tongue in cheek, of coarse, but i still think they're a waste of bandwidth)


E!, MTV - And get your 1,2.3 and C4 feeds from freeview already. There is space for another 2 HD channels, not to mention the increase in SD quality for 1,2,3 and C4 seeing as Freeview use much higher bitrates and are on the same satellite.

176 posts

Master Geek


  Reply # 161803 3-Sep-2008 11:26
Send private message

adamj:
testing123:
adamj: And let's not forget probably the biggest reason we do not have more HD channels: Transponder space is limited, which also makes it expensive. HD obviously has much higher bandwidth requirements than SD, so for every HD channel you are broadcasting, that is about 3 SD channels you cant.


Vibe, Alt and Food TV.... theres 3 you could lose without annoying me. complete rubbish.... lets not even get mention C4's new programming

(tongue in cheek, of coarse, but i still think they're a waste of bandwidth)


E!, MTV - And get your 1,2.3 and C4 feeds from freeview already. There is space for another 2 HD channels, not to mention the increase in SD quality for 1,2,3 and C4 seeing as Freeview use much higher bitrates and are on the same satellite.


VIVA LOS REVOLUTION!



3 posts

Wannabe Geek


  Reply # 161805 3-Sep-2008 11:37
Send private message

testing123:
adamj:
testing123:
adamj: And let's not forget probably the biggest reason we do not have more HD channels: Transponder space is limited, which also makes it expensive. HD obviously has much higher bandwidth requirements than SD, so for every HD channel you are broadcasting, that is about 3 SD channels you cant.


Vibe, Alt and Food TV.... theres 3 you could lose without annoying me. complete rubbish.... lets not even get mention C4's new programming

(tongue in cheek, of coarse, but i still think they're a waste of bandwidth)


E!, MTV - And get your 1,2.3 and C4 feeds from freeview already. There is space for another 2 HD channels, not to mention the increase in SD quality for 1,2,3 and C4 seeing as Freeview use much higher bitrates and are on the same satellite.


VIVA LOS REVOLUTION!


They have 15 box office channels also. Hell, who even uses box office channels.

They only need 3 maxium.

There is heaps of crap they could axe and no one would miss.

1120 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 135


  Reply # 161839 3-Sep-2008 13:29
Send private message

Dont forget that the Foxtel HD movie channel is PPV only @ $7/movie.
So its not really in their HD tier, just OnDemand HD movies.  But understand the viewpoints on Lifestyle vs Movies in HD.

Does anyone know if the Foxtel Sports HD channel is 100% HD (or a mixture like NZ dependent on the native HD feed)?
Interested to know if they can use surplus capacity on the transponder to push HD movies down to the STB while the Sport channel is broadcasting in SD.  Or whether they broadcast 5 full channels in HD 24/7 - cant imagine they use capacity to push HD movies to the STB 24/7.

6062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 178

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 161850 3-Sep-2008 14:21
Send private message

The Foxtel movie channel which is OnDemand PPV is run in non realtime, so has an effective bitrate probably not much more than a baseline SD channel.

I think Spyware is on the money (scuse the pun) regarding NatGeo/Discovery, but beyond Movies, Sport, and NatGeo/Discovery and the primetime stuff on TV1/2/3 you will quickly run out of HD stuff anyway.

Cyril

Awesome
4780 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1059

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 161856 3-Sep-2008 14:35
Send private message

cyril7: The Foxtel movie channel which is OnDemand PPV is run in non realtime, so has an effective bitrate probably not much more than a baseline SD channel.

I think Spyware is on the money (scuse the pun) regarding NatGeo/Discovery, but beyond Movies, Sport, and NatGeo/Discovery and the primetime stuff on TV1/2/3 you will quickly run out of HD stuff anyway.

Cyril


For now. Hope they can conjure something up in a few years time when the availability of HD programming far exceeds what there is today.

6062 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 178

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 161862 3-Sep-2008 14:50
Send private message

I think its been well noted on other threads that Skys HD expansion will most likely happen on Optus D3 once its in service early next year.

That said I dont think there is an immediate capacity issue on D1 the current HD channels are on two muxs in TP10 which based on 8PSK 22500 FEC2/3 gives a usable payload of around 45Mb/s, and from all accounts the HD channels are running around 8-12Mb/s so thats 4HD channels per mux so one mux is only partially used at this time, and then there is another two muxs at TP9 to go, so thats potentially another 9-10HD channels before D1 is full (assuming no more SD expansion is needed).

So, my guess is it all comes down to money and the business case needed to put up more channels, not currently a technical limitation.

Cyril

1921 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 135

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 161931 3-Sep-2008 19:00
Send private message

cyril7: I think its been well noted on other threads that Skys HD expansion will most likely happen on Optus D3 once its in service early next year.

That said I dont think there is an immediate capacity issue on D1 the current HD channels are on two muxs in TP10 which based on 8PSK 22500 FEC2/3 gives a usable payload of around 45Mb/s, and from all accounts the HD channels are running around 8-12Mb/s so thats 4HD channels per mux so one mux is only partially used at this time, and then there is another two muxs at TP9 to go, so thats potentially another 9-10HD channels before D1 is full (assuming no more SD expansion is needed).

So, my guess is it all comes down to money and the business case needed to put up more channels, not currently a technical limitation.

Cyril


They are currently splitting the load at 3 HD channels per half transponder. I haven't been able to check the bitrates as I don't currently have a DVB-S2 card.




Generally known online as OpenMedia, now working for Red Hat New Zealand as a Solution Architect for all things Linux, Virtual and of course Cloud. Still playing with MythTV and digital media on the side.

Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand's IT industry in 2018 and beyond
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:50


Introducing your new workplace headache: Gen Z
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:45


Jucy set to introduce electric campervan fleet
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:41


Hawaiki cable system will be ready for service in June 2018
Posted 22-Jan-2018 12:32


New Zealand hits peak broadband data
Posted 18-Jan-2018 12:21


Amazon Echo devices coming to New Zealand early February 2018
Posted 18-Jan-2018 10:53


$3.74 million for new electric vehicles in New Zealand
Posted 17-Jan-2018 11:27


Nova 2i: Value, not excitement from Huawei
Posted 17-Jan-2018 09:02


Less news in Facebook News Feed revamp
Posted 15-Jan-2018 13:15


Australian Government contract awarded to Datacom Connect
Posted 11-Jan-2018 08:37


Why New Zealand needs a chief technology officer
Posted 6-Jan-2018 13:59


Amazon release Silk Browser and Firefox for Fire TV
Posted 21-Dec-2017 13:42


New Chief Technology Officer role created
Posted 19-Dec-2017 22:18


All I want for Christmas is a new EV
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:54


How clever is this: AI will create 2.3 million jobs by 2020
Posted 19-Dec-2017 19:52



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.