![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
nitrotech: I really can't believe so many people are getting on the band wagon - reality is they sold you a $5 SIM card you put it into the phone in such a way that damaged it = your problem.
?
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
nitrotech: I really can't believe so many people are getting on the band wagon - reality is they sold you a $5 SIM card you put it into the phone in such a way that damaged it = your problem.
The adapters are fine if you are careful - I can't see how you could possibly win this one and is it worth your time?
nitrotech: I really can't believe so many people are getting on the band wagon - reality is they sold you a $5 SIM card you put it into the phone in such a way that damaged it = your problem.
The adapters are fine if you are careful - I can't see how you could possibly win this one and is it worth your time?
gregmcc: Keep at it, you are doing great, go armed with the relevent section of the CGA.
But also look at the section that also deals with claims for additional costs, such as the cost of petrol to go back and forward to the store, your time in dealing with the problem, have you sent the phone in for a quote on repair? if so I'm sure that there were costs assocated with that. If you have to file a case with the disputes tribunal there will be a filing fee, add that to your list of expensises.
Galaxy S10
Garmin Fenix 5
jeffnz: Not sure how Telecom are liable as unless it was a store owned by them it isn't their problem.
If there are a lot of cases that show the adapter is faulty then fine go for it.
As I understand it you fitted the adapter to the phone and when you took it out it hooked some wire which broke! as above if it can't be proved it was due to faulty adapter or bad design I think you need to accept responsibility for breaking it.
However it should be fit for the purpose for which it was sold so yet again if it isn't then you have a case.
mattwnz:jeffnz: Not sure how Telecom are liable as unless it was a store owned by them it isn't their problem.
If there are a lot of cases that show the adapter is faulty then fine go for it.
As I understand it you fitted the adapter to the phone and when you took it out it hooked some wire which broke! as above if it can't be proved it was due to faulty adapter or bad design I think you need to accept responsibility for breaking it.
However it should be fit for the purpose for which it was sold so yet again if it isn't then you have a case.
But it is trading on the telecom name and brand, so one would normally assume you are dealing with telecom. You often don't find out it isn't once you have paid and you look at the invocie.
Galaxy S10
Garmin Fenix 5
Galaxy S10
Garmin Fenix 5
jeffnz:
That as maybe but if it is a franchise then I fail to see how they are responsible legally, morally (if it is indeed their fault) maybe.
sbiddle: And whether the OP got one of these and punched out the nano SIM and then needed the surround to fit the Micro SIM slot, or whether it was an actual Micro SIM adapter?
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |