![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
sbiddle:kornflake: one word, monopoly.
What does this have to do with the issue?
Regards,
Old3eyes
cbrpilot:richms: IMO if the chorus tech has tested to the demarc and it synced there, then its job done close the ticket for the first instance.
If there is problems with the wiring in the "new" premisis then the telco should be either suggesting the user gets in a tech or arrange for a chorus tech to visit and fix the wiring for the standard fee, which it sounds like they didnt complete properly.
Not sure why the OP expects this to be done at zero cost to them?
The customer just wants a service that works. I do not see any evidence in this thread of them trying to get free anything.
If the issue is discovered in the premise wiring, this will either be covered by a wiring and maintenance agreement or if the customer does not have this then they will be up for the cost.
When our customers order a Broadband service, with one of our supplied routers and they have wiring & maintenance, they are paying for and expecting to get a service that works end to end. Not a service that works to a demarc point. They should not have to pay extra to get this, unless Chorus determine that the customer requires a splitter to receive service. This is why Telecom recommends and sells 'Wiring & Maintenance' - which is like a sort of insurance for your home wiring.
NonprayingMantis:cbrpilot:
When our customers order a Broadband service, with one of our supplied routers and they have wiring & maintenance, they are paying for and expecting to get a service that works end to end. Not a service that works to a demarc point. They should not have to pay extra to get this, unless Chorus determine that the customer requires a splitter to receive service. This is why Telecom recommends and sells 'Wiring & Maintenance' - which is like a sort of insurance for your home wiring.
IU could be wrong, but pretty sure wiring and maintenance doesn't cover installing a splitter.
My views are my own, and may not necessarily represent those of my employer.
In my opinion a fault is not fixed until it is working on the customers equipment, Chorus needs to stop using there own equipment and to start testing using the customers as well!
My views are my own, and may not necessarily represent those of my employer.
InstallerUFB: Does it work @ demarc - No - then they put it right @ Chorus's expence
- yes - Then Chorus have completed their obligation to provider with a 'self install'
- Chorus's contractors are not paid by Chorus to fix any further (and nore are Chorus) unless they have been instructed to by the Provider to continue. As the Providers are the ones who are charged for the rewire/reconfiguring of the network in the house if required. (it is up to them if they pass the costs on)
(We have been instructed that Telecom's Wire maintainance dose not cover this - as W&M only covers the repair and replacement of what 'was' working and has failed, with respect to fair ware and tare, not to connect up what is not working)
My views are my own, and may not necessarily represent those of my employer.
cbrpilot: It sounds like PCtek has another installer coming out with clear instructions to get it going. If he requires further assistance, no doubt he will post here or PM me.
---
We can only spectulate on this case on where the line was tested and with what - if there is a spliter installed and therefore DSL only goes to a specific Jkpt but not the ones that they are trying to use.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |