Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
13230 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1564


  Reply # 1078105 1-Jul-2014 17:33
One person supports this post
Send private message

ajobbins:
mattwnz: Although it is not our money, unless you are a shareholder. But IMHO it is a bit excessive, when as a company their shareprice has dropped a lot. But I suppose if they want to compete they have to change the perception people have with the old name.


Ultimately it's their customers that pay for this, not shareholders.


Only if customers are paying more as a result, which I don't think is the case. But it is probably coming out of profits, which means less money going back to shareholders. So the shareholders carry the cost with smaller dividends, and I know they have decreased from what they once were.

Probably not the best day for them to release this press release considering more problems with their Xtra yahoo email service, now down for over 6 hours.

Awesome
4769 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1054

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1078115 1-Jul-2014 17:49
Send private message

mattwnz: Only if customers are paying more as a result, which I don't think is the case. But it is probably coming out of profits, which means less money going back to shareholders. So the shareholders carry the cost with smaller dividends


But they don't. Decreased dividends from the past are a different issue. I seriously doubt shareholders will see a smaller dividend as a result of this rebrand. It will be paid for from operating funds that otherwise might have been used to invest in new technology, or as revenue that might have otherwise been uncollected through more competitive pricing etc.

See my previous post. Shareholders are typically not very tolerant of wearing the cost of these kind of things.




Twitter: ajobbins


 
 
 
 


Onward
11287 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5013

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1078118 1-Jul-2014 17:55
Send private message

ajobbins:
mattwnz: Only if customers are paying more as a result, which I don't think is the case. But it is probably coming out of profits, which means less money going back to shareholders. So the shareholders carry the cost with smaller dividends


But they don't. Decreased dividends from the past are a different issue. I seriously doubt shareholders will see a smaller dividend as a result of this rebrand. It will be paid for from operating funds that otherwise might have been used to invest in new technology, or as revenue that might have otherwise been uncollected through more competitive pricing etc.

See my previous post. Shareholders are typically not very tolerant of wearing the cost of these kind of things.


I don't have a problem with this investment in brand development




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


13230 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1564


  Reply # 1078119 1-Jul-2014 17:55
Send private message

ajobbins:
mattwnz: Only if customers are paying more as a result, which I don't think is the case. But it is probably coming out of profits, which means less money going back to shareholders. So the shareholders carry the cost with smaller dividends


But they don't. Decreased dividends from the past are a different issue. I seriously doubt shareholders will see a smaller dividend as a result of this rebrand. It will be paid for from operating funds that otherwise might have been used to invest in new technology, or as revenue that might have otherwise been uncollected through more competitive pricing etc.

See my previous post. Shareholders are typically not very tolerant of wearing the cost of these kind of things.


Well they have downsized their staff, which could be one area they are saving money in. But the current share price and it's huge drops over recent years do show that shareholders haven't been that happy with lower revenue and reduced dividends, and the share price is largely based on returns people get. But in the grand scheme of things, rebranding shouldn't be that expensive, and it is only half a rebrand, as the logo is still the old one. So there was probably a big saving there.

3695 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 551

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1078182 1-Jul-2014 19:49
Send private message

I'm surprised that it's taken this long to rebrand. Historically the Telecom brand has been perceived as conservative and middle aged, and I was half expecting them to rebrand ten years ago when their '$10 text' promotion started gaining them some traction with the yoof.

1183 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 201


  Reply # 1078369 2-Jul-2014 02:10
One person supports this post
Send private message

ALTRON: Expanded 4G coverage would of been better than a superficial name change.


I doubt that'll happen, I mean, this is the same company that has remained with Yahoo after constant problems then there was the 'awesome' Bebo phone - I sometimes wonder whether those making the decisions are either getting close to retirement or completely out of touch given whom they form relationships with. Honestly at this point I'm wondering whether they're going to have an arrangement with MySpace and launch a smartphone.




Laptop: MacBook (Intel Core m7 1.3Ghz, 8GB RAM, 512GB SSD)

 

Desktop: iMac 5K (i7 4.0GHz, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD)

 

Smartphone:

 


232 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 39


  Reply # 1078418 2-Jul-2014 08:35
Send private message

I agree with doing a re brand but not so much with the chosen name. Just feels like a weak attempt.

From what I've heard they are essentially only replacing the word 'Telecom' with 'Spark and 'Spark Digital' (Gen-i), so may not be as costly as a full re brand.

Onward
11287 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5013

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1078420 2-Jul-2014 08:40
Send private message

profrink: I agree with doing a re brand but not so much with the chosen name. Just feels like a weak attempt.

From what I've heard they are essentially only replacing the word 'Telecom' with 'Spark and 'Spark Digital' (Gen-i), so may not be as costly as a full re brand.


it's been happening for a while, the new Logo being around now for quite a few months and makes more sense with the new name. It's cool.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


7617 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 720

Subscriber

  Reply # 1078433 2-Jul-2014 09:19
Send private message

alasta: I'm surprised that it's taken this long to rebrand. Historically the Telecom brand has been perceived as conservative and middle aged, and I was half expecting them to rebrand ten years ago when their '$10 text' promotion started gaining them some traction with the yoof.

 

I don't see Telsta AU  rushing out to change their brand just because it's been around for 20 years plus  or Vodafone ..   If fact most of the telcos around the world have not changed brands  just for the sake of it.  They have in the case of the US when mergers have taken place.




Regards,

Old3eyes


6430 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1567


  Reply # 1078436 2-Jul-2014 09:34
Send private message

old3eyes:
alasta: I'm surprised that it's taken this long to rebrand. Historically the Telecom brand has been perceived as conservative and middle aged, and I was half expecting them to rebrand ten years ago when their '$10 text' promotion started gaining them some traction with the yoof.

I don't see Telsta AU  rushing out to change their brand just because it's been around for 20 years plus  or Vodafone ..   If fact most of the telcos around the world have not changed brands  just for the sake of it.  They have in the case of the US when mergers have taken place.


France Telecom -> Orange

BT Mobile -> O2   (then they sold it)

Deutsche Telecom -> T-Mobile  (and T-Home etc)

Telefonica -> Movistar

(the last two retain their names for the group, but the branding has been changed)


Also bear in mind that most incumbent telcos still own their fixed networks - so if Telecom are changing because they don't want to be seen as a network owner anymore, that logic wouldn't apply to almost all incumbent Telcos around the world.

Onward
11287 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5013

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1078447 2-Jul-2014 10:02
Send private message

Lots of coroporations rebrand

International Business Machines----- IBM
General Motors Corporation---------- GM
Teal------------------------------------- Air New Zealand
BOAC............................................ British Airways


To name just a few. Rebranding gives the opportunity to renew and refresh, its not a bad thing.




Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


7617 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 720

Subscriber

  Reply # 1078536 2-Jul-2014 11:50
Send private message

KiwiNZ: Lots of coroporations rebrand

International Business Machines----- IBM
General Motors Corporation---------- GM
Teal------------------------------------- Air New Zealand
BOAC............................................ British Airways


To name just a few. Rebranding gives the opportunity to renew and refresh, its not a bad thing.


But those names still mean the same thing.  Most abbreviations.   Spark in no way abbreviates the name Telecom NZ..

Bit of a long bow quoting TEAL as most people under 50 will have no idea what that was..




Regards,

Old3eyes


Stu

Hammered
4726 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 946

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1078539 2-Jul-2014 11:58
Send private message

Well actually, it demonstrates that rebranding isn't a new thing. It's been happening since, well, forever...

Onward
11287 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 5013

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1078541 2-Jul-2014 11:59
Send private message

old3eyes:
KiwiNZ: Lots of coroporations rebrand

International Business Machines----- IBM
General Motors Corporation---------- GM
Teal------------------------------------- Air New Zealand
BOAC............................................ British Airways


To name just a few. Rebranding gives the opportunity to renew and refresh, its not a bad thing.


But those names still mean the same thing.  Most abbreviations.   Spark in no way abbreviates the name Telecom NZ..

Bit of a long bow quoting TEAL as most people under 50 will have no idea what that was..


In 50 years how many will remember Telecom?

A more recent change was Datsun to Nissan






Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

 It's our only home, lets clean it up then...

 

Take My Advice, Pull Down Your Pants And Slide On The Ice!

 

 


7617 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 720

Subscriber

  Reply # 1078558 2-Jul-2014 12:30
Send private message

KiwiNZ:
old3eyes:
KiwiNZ: Lots of coroporations rebrand

International Business Machines----- IBM
General Motors Corporation---------- GM
Teal------------------------------------- Air New Zealand
BOAC............................................ British Airways


To name just a few. Rebranding gives the opportunity to renew and refresh, its not a bad thing.


But those names still mean the same thing.  Most abbreviations.   Spark in no way abbreviates the name Telecom NZ..

Bit of a long bow quoting TEAL as most people under 50 will have no idea what that was..


In 50 years how many will remember Telecom?

A more recent change was Datsun to Nissan




Early 1980s..




Regards,

Old3eyes


1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Vodafone TV — television in the cloud
Posted 17-Oct-2017 19:29


Nokia 8 review: Classy midrange pure Android phone
Posted 16-Oct-2017 07:27


Why carriers might want to embrace Commerce Commission study, MVNOs
Posted 13-Oct-2017 09:42


Fitbit launches Ionic, its health and fitness smartwatch
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:52


Xero launches machine learning automation to improve coding accuracy for small businesses
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:45


Bank of New Zealand uses Intel AI to detect financial crime
Posted 12-Oct-2017 15:39


Sony launches Xperia XZ1, a smartphone with real-time 3D capture
Posted 11-Oct-2017 10:26


Notes on Nokia’s phone comeback
Posted 10-Oct-2017 10:06


Air New Zealand begins Inflight Wi-Fi rollout
Posted 9-Oct-2017 20:16


The latest mobile phones in perspective
Posted 9-Oct-2017 18:34


Review: Acronis True Image 2018 — serious backup
Posted 8-Oct-2017 11:22


Lenovo launches ThinkPad Anniversary Edition 25
Posted 7-Oct-2017 23:16


Less fone, more tech as Vodafone gets brand make-over
Posted 6-Oct-2017 08:16


API Talent Achieves AWS MSP Partner Status
Posted 5-Oct-2017 21:20


Stellar Consulting Group now a Domo Partner
Posted 5-Oct-2017 21:03



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.