Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
116 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 24


  Reply # 1100075 1-Aug-2014 14:58
Send private message

itxtme:
Demeter:

Consider the population densities per square kilometer of countries overseas in relation to New Zealand. Consider how many more prospective customers there are available to each network carrier, how much per customer it costs the carrier to do a network roll-out and the subsequent return on investment those customers offer and then do some basic math. I'm sure the answer will become apparent eventually.



So you can hand on heart say that the profit margin on data is not higher than that of calling and texting? 



all three of these items are measured differently?

1467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 209

Subscriber

  Reply # 1100108 1-Aug-2014 15:43
Send private message

johntynz:
itxtme:
Demeter:

Consider the population densities per square kilometer of countries overseas in relation to New Zealand. Consider how many more prospective customers there are available to each network carrier, how much per customer it costs the carrier to do a network roll-out and the subsequent return on investment those customers offer and then do some basic math. I'm sure the answer will become apparent eventually.



So you can hand on heart say that the profit margin on data is not higher than that of calling and texting? 



all three of these items are measured differently?


Yep, if we asses each for their individual fixed and variable costs / the income.  Therefore making them comparible.  I am not wanting a comparison of 1 txt vs 1 minute of calling vs 1Mb of data, but a comparison on how much of every dollar spent on data is profit vs calling and text.

I surmise that the margin on data is significantly higher than txt or voice, and I question why.



 
 
 
 


1976 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 451


  Reply # 1100109 1-Aug-2014 15:43
Send private message

You can get unlimited NZ and Aus calling on Skinny for $40 a month along with unlimited texts and 250mb data

6428 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1564


  Reply # 1100118 1-Aug-2014 15:58
One person supports this post
Send private message

itxtme:
johntynz:
itxtme:
Demeter:

Consider the population densities per square kilometer of countries overseas in relation to New Zealand. Consider how many more prospective customers there are available to each network carrier, how much per customer it costs the carrier to do a network roll-out and the subsequent return on investment those customers offer and then do some basic math. I'm sure the answer will become apparent eventually.



So you can hand on heart say that the profit margin on data is not higher than that of calling and texting? 



all three of these items are measured differently?


Yep, if we asses each for their individual fixed and variable costs / the income.  Therefore making them comparible.  I am not wanting a comparison of 1 txt vs 1 minute of calling vs 1Mb of data, but a comparison on how much of every dollar spent on data is profit vs calling and text.

I surmise that the margin on data is significantly higher than txt or voice, and I question why.




It;s hard when so much stuff is bundled now, so it's not possible to say with 100% certainty.
 But generally accepted wisdom is that dollar for dollar of revenue,  data is a lot more network intensive than either voice or sms.  i.e. $1 'worth' of data uses a much higher amount of network capacity than $1 of voice minutes or SMS. 

Therefore voice and sms is vastly more profitable than data is.

ajw

1311 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 105


  Reply # 1100138 1-Aug-2014 16:32
Send private message

NonprayingMantis:
itxtme:
johntynz:
itxtme:
Demeter:

Consider the population densities per square kilometer of countries overseas in relation to New Zealand. Consider how many more prospective customers there are available to each network carrier, how much per customer it costs the carrier to do a network roll-out and the subsequent return on investment those customers offer and then do some basic math. I'm sure the answer will become apparent eventually.



So you can hand on heart say that the profit margin on data is not higher than that of calling and texting? 



all three of these items are measured differently?


Yep, if we asses each for their individual fixed and variable costs / the income.  Therefore making them comparible.  I am not wanting a comparison of 1 txt vs 1 minute of calling vs 1Mb of data, but a comparison on how much of every dollar spent on data is profit vs calling and text.

I surmise that the margin on data is significantly higher than txt or voice, and I question why.




It;s hard when so much stuff is bundled now, so it's not possible to say with 100% certainty.
 But generally accepted wisdom is that dollar for dollar of revenue,  data is a lot more network intensive than either voice or sms.  i.e. $1 'worth' of data uses a much higher amount of network capacity than $1 of voice minutes or SMS. 

Therefore voice and sms is vastly more profitable than data is.


Is it true that LTE gives a bigger return on investment and is more spectrally efficient  than a circuit switched HSPA network.

65 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 9
Inactive user


  Reply # 1100143 1-Aug-2014 16:38
Send private message

ajw:
NonprayingMantis:
itxtme:
johntynz:
itxtme:
Demeter:

Consider the population densities per square kilometer of countries overseas in relation to New Zealand. Consider how many more prospective customers there are available to each network carrier, how much per customer it costs the carrier to do a network roll-out and the subsequent return on investment those customers offer and then do some basic math. I'm sure the answer will become apparent eventually.



So you can hand on heart say that the profit margin on data is not higher than that of calling and texting? 



all three of these items are measured differently?


Yep, if we asses each for their individual fixed and variable costs / the income.  Therefore making them comparible.  I am not wanting a comparison of 1 txt vs 1 minute of calling vs 1Mb of data, but a comparison on how much of every dollar spent on data is profit vs calling and text.

I surmise that the margin on data is significantly higher than txt or voice, and I question why.




It;s hard when so much stuff is bundled now, so it's not possible to say with 100% certainty.
 But generally accepted wisdom is that dollar for dollar of revenue,  data is a lot more network intensive than either voice or sms.  i.e. $1 'worth' of data uses a much higher amount of network capacity than $1 of voice minutes or SMS. 

Therefore voice and sms is vastly more profitable than data is.


Is it true that LTE gives a bigger return on investment and is more spectrally efficient  than a circuit switched HSPA network.
that is true

1467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 209

Subscriber

  Reply # 1100162 1-Aug-2014 16:52
Send private message

NonprayingMantis: 
It;s hard when so much stuff is bundled now, so it's not possible to say with 100% certainty.
 But generally accepted wisdom is that dollar for dollar of revenue,  data is a lot more network intensive than either voice or sms.  i.e. $1 'worth' of data uses a much higher amount of network capacity than $1 of voice minutes or SMS. 

Therefore voice and sms is vastly more profitable than data is.


My goodness, you are not thinking profit margin, you are still stuck thinking about the value of $1 worth of data which depends on how much a user pays.

Different products have different profit margins, petrol as an example has a very low profit margin of around 5%, clothing very high say 150%.  

Now if say mobile calling is 30% and txting is 30% explain to me why data should 70%?

Trust me when I say that the telcos know EXACTLY how much each of their products cost them, they didnt just come up with the price out of thin air.  Its is fixed costs + Variable costs + desired margin = price.


The reality is data is very expensive in NZ, the Vodafone rep indicated that was because of X Y Z.  My suggestion is that they can compete in voice and text but data is prohibitively expensive - but only* in NZ.  No telco rep will truthfully "hand on heart" tell us they are not gouging data prices, but I knew that when I asked it, was merely making a point!


*gross generlisation but you know what I mean...

65 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 9
Inactive user


  Reply # 1100168 1-Aug-2014 16:57
Send private message

itxtme:
NonprayingMantis: 
It;s hard when so much stuff is bundled now, so it's not possible to say with 100% certainty.
 But generally accepted wisdom is that dollar for dollar of revenue,  data is a lot more network intensive than either voice or sms.  i.e. $1 'worth' of data uses a much higher amount of network capacity than $1 of voice minutes or SMS. 

Therefore voice and sms is vastly more profitable than data is.


My goodness, you are not thinking profit margin, you are still stuck thinking about the value of $1 worth of data which depends on how much a user pays.

Different products have different profit margins, petrol as an example has a very low profit margin of around 5%, clothing very high say 150%.  

Now if say mobile calling is 30% and txting is 30% explain to me why data should 70%?

Trust me when I say that the telcos know EXACTLY how much each of their products cost them, they didnt just come up with the price out of thin air.  Its is fixed costs + Variable costs + desired margin = price.


The reality is data is very expensive in NZ, the Vodafone rep indicated that was because of X Y Z.  My suggestion is that they can compete in voice and text but data is prohibitively expensive - but only* in NZ.  No telco rep will truthfully "hand on heart" tell us they are not gouging data prices, but I knew that when I asked it, was merely making a point!


*gross generlisation but you know what I mean...
Two Degrees have been very generous with their data offerings. 

4913 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1953

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1100182 1-Aug-2014 17:08
One person supports this post
Send private message

itxtme: surmise that the margin on data is significantly higher than txt or voice, and I question why.



Really? From a data perspective, 1GB of data can pack approx 2000 mins of voice. So I think voice has a higher margin as it costs a lot less than data to move.




Chorus has spent $1.4 billion on making their xDSL broadband network faster. If your still stuck on ADSL or VDSL, why not spend from $150 on a master filter install to make sure you are getting the most out of your connection?
I install - Naked DSL, DSL Master Splitters, VoIP, data cabling and general computer support for home and small business.
Rural Broadband RBI installer for Ultimate Broadband and Full Flavour

 

Need help in Auckland, Waikato or BoP? Click my email button, or email me direct: [my user name] at geekzonemail dot com


1467 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 209

Subscriber

  Reply # 1100194 1-Aug-2014 17:25
Send private message

... Wouldnt that depend on the cost per minute of calling????? 

Everyone is ignoring the fact we dont know the profit margin, using arguments like data throughput, but that is not an indication as to how profitable data charges are at the moment.

In your opinion is mobile data good value for money in NZ? 

65 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 9
Inactive user


  Reply # 1100195 1-Aug-2014 17:30
Send private message

itxtme: ... Wouldnt that depend on the cost per minute of calling????? 

Everyone is ignoring the fact we dont know the profit margin, using arguments like data throughput, but that is not an indication as to how profitable data charges are at the moment.

In your opinion is mobile data good value for money in NZ? 
no not at all

2841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 679

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1100202 1-Aug-2014 17:41
Send private message

Quibbler:
itxtme: ... Wouldnt that depend on the cost per minute of calling????? 

Everyone is ignoring the fact we dont know the profit margin, using arguments like data throughput, but that is not an indication as to how profitable data charges are at the moment.

In your opinion is mobile data good value for money in NZ? 
no not at all


so what are you basing that on or is it just you want to pay less like everyone else.

Having a look at Telstra in Oz they have a $55 plan 12 month contract with only 1.5gb per month so is that better than here given their size, doesn't look like it but only one I looked at.




Galaxy S7 Edge

 

Garmin  Vivoactive HR




65 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 9
Inactive user


  Reply # 1100219 1-Aug-2014 17:43
Send private message

jeffnz:
Quibbler:
itxtme: ... Wouldnt that depend on the cost per minute of calling????? 

Everyone is ignoring the fact we dont know the profit margin, using arguments like data throughput, but that is not an indication as to how profitable data charges are at the moment.

In your opinion is mobile data good value for money in NZ? 
no not at all


so what are you basing that on or is it just you want to pay less like everyone else.

Having a look at Telstra in Oz they have a $55 plan 12 month contract with only 1.5gb per month so is that better than here given their size, doesn't look like it but only one I looked at.
There's a mobile company in Aussie (I can't remember the name) that have been adverting on Animal Planet a Mobile plan with 4GB of data and unlimited calling and texting across Australia for $39 a month

2841 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 679

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1100227 1-Aug-2014 17:55
Send private message

Quibbler:
jeffnz:
Quibbler:
itxtme: ... Wouldnt that depend on the cost per minute of calling????? 

Everyone is ignoring the fact we dont know the profit margin, using arguments like data throughput, but that is not an indication as to how profitable data charges are at the moment.

In your opinion is mobile data good value for money in NZ? 
no not at all


so what are you basing that on or is it just you want to pay less like everyone else.

Having a look at Telstra in Oz they have a $55 plan 12 month contract with only 1.5gb per month so is that better than here given their size, doesn't look like it but only one I looked at.
There's a company in Aussie that have been adverting on Animal Planet a Mobile plan with 4GB of data and unlimited calling and texting across Australia for $39 a month 


well they can't be much of a threat if a company like Telstra has charges like it does.

My point is are we that badly off given pricing has been coming down in last year or so and data up. I think you can always find someone cheaper but the grass isn't always greener so what are we getting annoyed about.



edit: I see the cheap plan and that is cheap but also notice its only 3g




Galaxy S7 Edge

 

Garmin  Vivoactive HR




116 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 24


  Reply # 1100247 1-Aug-2014 18:24
3 people support this post
Send private message

i fear this thread has been derailed :(

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Red Hat unveils production-ready open source hyperconverged infrastructure
Posted 23-Jun-2017 22:10


Whatever ailed Vodafone broadband … seems to be fixed
Posted 23-Jun-2017 14:10


VMware NSX Meets Stringent Government Security Standards with Common Criteria Certification
Posted 22-Jun-2017 19:05


Brother launches next-generation colour laser printers and all-in- ones for business
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:56


Intel and IOC announce partnership
Posted 22-Jun-2017 18:50


Samsung Galaxy Tab S3: Best Android tablet
Posted 21-Jun-2017 12:05


Wellington-based company helping secure Microsoft browsers
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:51


Endace delivers high performance with new 1/10/40 Gbps packet capture card
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:50


You can now integrate SMX security into Microsoft Office 365, Google and other cloud email platforms
Posted 20-Jun-2017 20:47


Ravensdown launches new decision-making tool HawkEye
Posted 19-Jun-2017 15:38


Spark planning to take on direct management of all consumer stores
Posted 19-Jun-2017 10:03


Qrious acquires Ubiquity
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:21


Spark New Zealand prepares for 5G with Nokia
Posted 14-Jun-2017 12:16


The future-proof 10.5-inch iPad Pro
Posted 13-Jun-2017 18:16


Mandatory data breach reporting in Australia
Posted 13-Jun-2017 11:30



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.