Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7

ajw

1400 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 127


  Reply # 1526174 5-Apr-2016 08:55
Send private message

sbiddle:

 

ajw:

 

Both companies will have to spend millions rolling out new transmission sites for this service to cover urban areas throughout the country.  

 

 

For most sites it'll be very cost effective enabling 2300, with the major work being additional panels required on some sites. Single RAN makes life very easy.

 

 

 

 

You still need the capacity and coverage and higher usage caps and competitive pricing to attract the punters. Would I be correct in saying that the single Ran infrastructure was added to spark transmission sites when sites were upgraded to 4G using Huawei networking equipment.

 

 


142 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  Reply # 1526177 5-Apr-2016 09:11
Send private message

These 4G services are interesting for my grandparents and the like as they stay within the 60/80GBs. But for any real household they are too restrictive. Do a 500GB/mnth for $80-100 and you'd see better uptake. Who knows you might just topple UFB.


145 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 29


  Reply # 1526183 5-Apr-2016 09:22
Send private message

olivernz:

 

These 4G services are interesting for my grandparents and the like as they stay within the 60/80GBs. But for any real household they are too restrictive. Do a 500GB/mnth for $80-100 and you'd see better uptake. Who knows you might just topple UFB.

 

 

 

 

I'd be surprised if 500GB/month was representative of a 'real household'. I consider myself a heavy user and I still only go through ~250GB/month.


ajw

1400 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 127


  Reply # 1526184 5-Apr-2016 09:23
Send private message

I use about 150GIG per month.


26601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6095

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526186 5-Apr-2016 09:24
3 people support this post
Send private message

olivernz:

 

These 4G services are interesting for my grandparents and the like as they stay within the 60/80GBs. But for any real household they are too restrictive. Do a 500GB/mnth for $80-100 and you'd see better uptake. Who knows you might just topple UFB.

 

 

That sort of cap is simply not possible for a mass market offering with high uptake unless the laws of physics are changed.

 

That's also representative of a 1% user - the target is still the vast majority of NZ Internet users who are sub 50GB per month.

 

Fixed wireless is not and never will be large scale replacement for UFB or high use users.

 

 

 

 


ajw

1400 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 127


  Reply # 1526187 5-Apr-2016 09:28
Send private message

sbiddle:

 

olivernz:

 

These 4G services are interesting for my grandparents and the like as they stay within the 60/80GBs. But for any real household they are too restrictive. Do a 500GB/mnth for $80-100 and you'd see better uptake. Who knows you might just topple UFB.

 

 

That sort of cap is simply not possible for a mass market offering with high uptake unless the laws of physics are changed.

 

That's also representative of a 1% user - the target is still the vast majority of NZ Internet users who are sub 50GB per month.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The 80GIG cap offered by spark wireless would last me about a fortnight. Most of my friends have unlimited connections.


26601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6095

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526188 5-Apr-2016 09:30
Send private message

ajw:

 

sbiddle:

 

olivernz:

 

These 4G services are interesting for my grandparents and the like as they stay within the 60/80GBs. But for any real household they are too restrictive. Do a 500GB/mnth for $80-100 and you'd see better uptake. Who knows you might just topple UFB.

 

 

That sort of cap is simply not possible for a mass market offering with high uptake unless the laws of physics are changed.

 

That's also representative of a 1% user - the target is still the vast majority of NZ Internet users who are sub 50GB per month.

 

 

 

 

The 80GIG cap offered by spark wireless would last me about a fortnight. Most of my friends have unlimited connections.

 

 

That doesn't mean it's representative of all NZ users. The vast majority of NZ internet users would still use well under 50GB per month.


ajw

1400 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 127


  Reply # 1526191 5-Apr-2016 09:34
Send private message

sbiddle:

 

ajw:

 

sbiddle:

 

olivernz:

 

These 4G services are interesting for my grandparents and the like as they stay within the 60/80GBs. But for any real household they are too restrictive. Do a 500GB/mnth for $80-100 and you'd see better uptake. Who knows you might just topple UFB.

 

 

That sort of cap is simply not possible for a mass market offering with high uptake unless the laws of physics are changed.

 

That's also representative of a 1% user - the target is still the vast majority of NZ Internet users who are sub 50GB per month.

 

 

 

 

The 80GIG cap offered by spark wireless would last me about a fortnight. Most of my friends have unlimited connections.

 

 

That doesn't mean it's representative of all NZ users. The vast majority of NZ internet users would still use well under 50GB per month.

 

 

 

 

Have a read.

 

http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/industry_sectors/information_technology_and_communications/ISPSurvey_HOTP2015/Commentary.aspx


142 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 27


  Reply # 1526202 5-Apr-2016 09:45
Send private message

Thanks 4 the link! Interesting reading. Yeah i am probably 1-2% in internet usage. And no, I don't use 500GB.I am between 150-350 per month. Adding two kids to the mix that love YouTube/Prime/... also adds heaps of data. I'm probably just dreaming of a fast wireless connection so that all the cabling issues I have to my property go away.


26601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6095

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526206 5-Apr-2016 09:48
Send private message

ajw:

 

sbiddle:

 

ajw:

 

sbiddle:

 

olivernz:

 

These 4G services are interesting for my grandparents and the like as they stay within the 60/80GBs. But for any real household they are too restrictive. Do a 500GB/mnth for $80-100 and you'd see better uptake. Who knows you might just topple UFB.

 

 

That sort of cap is simply not possible for a mass market offering with high uptake unless the laws of physics are changed.

 

That's also representative of a 1% user - the target is still the vast majority of NZ Internet users who are sub 50GB per month.

 

 

 

 

The 80GIG cap offered by spark wireless would last me about a fortnight. Most of my friends have unlimited connections.

 

 

That doesn't mean it's representative of all NZ users. The vast majority of NZ internet users would still use well under 50GB per month.

 

 

 

 

Have a read.

 

http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/industry_sectors/information_technology_and_communications/ISPSurvey_HOTP2015/Commentary.aspx

 

 

Working for an ISP I'm well aware of what usage patterns are. I'm also well aware of what an AVERAGE is and how an average is calculated - it means there are users above, and users below. The figures quoted for NZ usage are estimates of average usage - they are not a mean or a median.


ajw

1400 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 127


  Reply # 1526215 5-Apr-2016 10:26
Send private message

olivernz:

 

Thanks 4 the link! Interesting reading. Yeah i am probably 1-2% in internet usage. And no, I don't use 500GB.I am between 150-350 per month. Adding two kids to the mix that love YouTube/Prime/... also adds heaps of data. I'm probably just dreaming of a fast wireless connection so that all the cabling issues I have to my property go away.

 

 

 

 

Another article on usage.

 

 

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11469222


26601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6095

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526217 5-Apr-2016 10:35
One person supports this post
Send private message

ajw:

 

olivernz:

 

Thanks 4 the link! Interesting reading. Yeah i am probably 1-2% in internet usage. And no, I don't use 500GB.I am between 150-350 per month. Adding two kids to the mix that love YouTube/Prime/... also adds heaps of data. I'm probably just dreaming of a fast wireless connection so that all the cabling issues I have to my property go away.

 

 

 

 

Another article on usage.

 

 

 

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11469222

 

 

And your point is?

 

I'm not debating that any figures are incorrect, but merely that they are an AVERAGE. To have an average there are some people that use more than this, and some people that use less than this.

 

As I've already explained fixed wireless services like Skinny and Spark are aimed at the large market of customers who use under 50GB per month. They are not and never will be a replacement for UFB or other fixed line services for high use users.

 

 


536 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 154


  Reply # 1526317 5-Apr-2016 13:13
One person supports this post
Send private message

sbiddle:

 

Vodafone will be planning the same with their 2.6GHz and 3.5GHz spectrum. Their problem is 3.5GHz is not ready for mass market deployments yet due to lack of CPE support.

 

While I applaud Spark for what they're doing the bigger picture here is the heist of the century. While many regard this to be the Dick Smith selloff, it's actually the fact Spark managed to acquire a big block of spectrum for probably a minimum of 1/10th of what it was worth had this gone to auction. This is a big loss to the taxpayer.

 

 

 

 

This really was a heist! Considering Spark paid $149 Million for 40MHz in the 700MHz spectrum auction (though, I admit, that is in the 'prime' sub 1000MHz range) it would be interesting to know what Spark paid Woosh/Craig Wireless for the 70MHz block of 2.3GHz spectrum. Bet it wouldn't have been much given there is less than a year to utilize it or they would lose it anyway.

 

 

 

ajw:

 

sbiddle:

 

ajw:

 

Both companies will have to spend millions rolling out new transmission sites for this service to cover urban areas throughout the country.  

 

 

For most sites it'll be very cost effective enabling 2300, with the major work being additional panels required on some sites. Single RAN makes life very easy.

 

 

 

 

You still need the capacity and coverage and higher usage caps and competitive pricing to attract the punters. Would I be correct in saying that the single Ran infrastructure was added to spark transmission sites when sites were upgraded to 4G using Huawei networking equipment.

 

 

 

 

 

 

With their recently acquired 70MHz of 2.3GHz spectrum, (along with their two 20MHz blocks in the 2.5/2.6GHz spectrum) Spark now has 110MHz of bandwidth ideally suited for fixed wireless in a densely populated urban environment. That's more than they have in use for their entire 4G network currently (which is 90MHz made up of 40MHz @700MHz, 50MHz @ 1.8GHz plus a few sites on 2.6GHz) so they certainly now have the capacity.

 

And from sbiddle's comments about deployment, it doesn't seem this is going to take much in the way of $$$ or time, so there is the coverage.

 

Higher data caps may result from this, but fixed wireless (being a finite resource ultimately) should only ever be seen as a last resort for those unable to get a UFB connection (not as an alternative), and should be priced accordingly. What I mean by that is, so that you don't get users who can get UFB taking up the limited resource of those that can't get UFB.

 

 

 

Maybe pricing along the lines of:

 

$40/month for 30GB - Low use users

 

$80/month for 80GB - Average users who can't get UFB

 

$120/month for 150GB - Above average users who can't get UFB

 

$160/month for 250GB - Heavy users who can't get UFB

 

 

 

I would never expect to see an unlimited offering (nor do I think there should be) as that would potentially congest the network for everyone. But with reasonable data caps and pricing not too outrageous a fixed wireless service can be the perfect compliment to the UFB network. (But not a replacement!) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


26601 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6095

Moderator
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1526329 5-Apr-2016 13:34
Send private message

tangerz:

 

This really was a heist! Considering Spark paid $149 Million for 40MHz in the 700MHz spectrum auction (though, I admit, that is in the 'prime' sub 1000MHz range) it would be interesting to know what Spark paid Woosh/Craig Wireless for the 70MHz block of 2.3GHz spectrum. Bet it wouldn't have been much given there is less than a year to utilize it or they would lose it anyway.

 

 

 

The figure was public last week - $9 million


985 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 155

UberGroup

  Reply # 1526333 5-Apr-2016 13:39
Send private message

Yeah and Craig made a nice profit too considering it cost them $3.2mill all up.

 

 

 

It'll be interesting to see what happens in 3ghz land aswell, FDD is being phased out overseas and RSM have been pretty against changing the terms of spectrum mid use. Even with the old regional 3.5 blocks the TDD allowance is around 2/3 of what the FDD block was





Most problems are the result of previous solutions...

All comment's I make are my own personal opinion and do not in any way, shape or form reflect the views of current or former employers unless specifically stated 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central launches
Posted 10-Jul-2018 10:40


Spark completes first milestone in voice platform upgrade
Posted 10-Jul-2018 09:36


Microsoft ices heated developers
Posted 6-Jul-2018 20:16


PB Technologies charged for its extended warranties and warned for bait advertising
Posted 3-Jul-2018 15:45


Almost 20,000 people claim credits from Spark
Posted 29-Jun-2018 10:40


Cove sells NZ's first insurance policy via chatbot
Posted 25-Jun-2018 10:04


N4L helping TAKA Trust bridge the digital divide for Lower Hutt students
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:08


Winners Announced for 2018 CIO Awards
Posted 18-Jun-2018 13:03


Logitech Rally sets new standard for USB-connected video conference cameras
Posted 18-Jun-2018 09:27


Russell Stanners steps down as Vodafone NZ CEO
Posted 12-Jun-2018 09:13


Intergen recognised as 2018 Microsoft Country Partner of the Year for New Zealand
Posted 12-Jun-2018 08:00


Finalists Announced For Microsoft NZ Partner Awards
Posted 6-Jun-2018 15:12


Vocus Group and Vodafone announce joint venture to accelerate fibre innovation
Posted 5-Jun-2018 10:52


Kogan.com to launch Kogan Mobile in New Zealand
Posted 4-Jun-2018 14:34


Enable doubles fibre broadband speeds for its most popular wholesale service in Christchurch
Posted 2-Jun-2018 20:07



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.