Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
359 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 72

Subscriber

  Reply # 1784811 19-May-2017 16:13
Send private message quote this post

 

 

If you dont want to move from spark using a VPN client can get around the issue as they can link endpoints over their own routes.

 

I have used Astrill with good success.

 

 





Speedtest

136 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 41


  Reply # 1784853 19-May-2017 16:33
Send private message quote this post

michaelmurfy:

 

I wouldn't imagine that a ping difference of a few ms would make much of a difference to a game like WoT.

 

 

It is no different to an FPS.


 
 
 
 


6280 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2734

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1784876 19-May-2017 17:03
Send private message quote this post

Guys remember that this is just how the internet works. To be perfectly honest most of what @Amosnz said is quite incorrect and Spark do make a very good effort to keep latency low and have always been the most consistent with speed - this is why many gamers pick them as these sorts of routing problems are rare at best. You've got to understand that it is practically impossible to control the route your traffic takes once it leaves your network. I'm sure @Talkiet can expand on this if he desires to however this has already been explained many times.




Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Want to be with an epic ISP? Want $20 to join them too? Well, use this link to sign up to BigPipe!
The Router Guide | Electric KiwiCommunity UniFi Cloud Controller | Ubiquiti Edgerouter Tutorial


809 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 158


  Reply # 1784883 19-May-2017 17:24
Send private message quote this post

How is it incorrect? ISPs are free to suppress certain routes if they choose.

 

 

As for the OP you might have better luck making things known from the other end, my understanding is Wargaming's network partner (which looks to be G-Core Labs S.A.) puts in a lot of effort in regards to low latency routes they may be able to effect a resolution from their end. If you let them know via their NOC email they might even respond.

359 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 72

Subscriber

  Reply # 1784888 19-May-2017 17:31
Send private message quote this post

@michaelmurfy Usually your comments are helpful and insightful but when you offer opinions like "I wouldn't imagine that a ping difference of a few ms would make much of a difference to a game like WoT" perhaps you should refrain. 

 

The OP mention an increase of ~150 ms, and while World of Warships (the game the OP originally mentioned) is less affected by latency than World of Tanks (WoWS firing is generally a lot longer range than WoT) 150ms would be noticeable.

 

I stand by my comments, as they are observations from real world usage. The only thing I didn't go into is that traceroutes are only showing how your data is getting to the destination, not how the destination gets data back to you.  Sometimes that can be a completely different route (and impossible for your ISP to correct if its a higher latency path).





Speedtest

6280 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2734

Moderator
Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1784895 19-May-2017 17:45
Send private message quote this post

yitz: How is it incorrect? ISPs are free to suppress certain routes if they choose. As for the OP you might have better luck making things known from the other end, my understanding is Wargaming's network partner (which looks to be G-Core Labs S.A.) puts in a lot of effort in regards to low latency routes they may be able to effect a resolution from their end. If you let them know via their NOC email they might even respond.

 

Simply this:

 

Amosnz: Then I moved to Spark who with a lot more customers require a lot more bandwidth, and found their focus is on providing capacity at low cost rather than the lowest possible latency.  When UFB became available I moved to another smaller ISP (where I also know someone) and once again have never had a problem getting increased pings looked into and corrected..

 

Global Gateway is used by many NZ ISP's and is considered a "premium" product (however as others rightfully pointed out sometimes not the best). Pings are normally quite low however the issue the OP is having can happen on any ISP. I can confirm I am getting the same route on a couple of other ISP's also using Global Gateway.

 

It does seem there is a problem with the routes at the moment (taken from another ISP):

 

 

murphy@pikachu:~$ traceroute 162.213.61.115
traceroute to 162.213.61.115 (162.213.61.115), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 router (192.168.2.1) 0.758 ms 0.692 ms 0.662 ms
2 219.88.232.254 (219.88.232.254) 12.610 ms 14.833 ms 14.813 ms
3 122.56.60.70 (122.56.60.70) 13.110 ms 13.088 ms 13.065 ms
4 122.56.60.71 (122.56.60.71) 13.506 ms 14.584 ms 14.577 ms
5 ae11-201.tkbr11.global-gateway.net.nz (122.56.118.149) 14.533 ms 14.545 ms 14.869 ms
6 ae6-10.akbr7.global-gateway.net.nz (203.96.120.93) 15.467 ms 14.397 ms 14 .789 ms
7 122.56.119.18 (122.56.119.18) 38.823 ms xe0-0-1.sgbr3.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.232.110) 35.908 ms 36.602 ms
8 ae2-10.sgbr4.global-gateway.net.nz (202.50.232.246) 35.512 ms 35.519 ms 3 5.410 ms
9 ae-3.a04.sydnau03.au.ra.gin.ntt.net (103.13.80.125) 35.437 ms 35.391 ms 3 6.806 ms
10 ae-4.r21.sydnau03.au.bb.gin.ntt.net (202.68.64.124) 41.162 ms 41.165 ms 4 1.117 ms
11 ae-11.r31.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.5.34) 149.469 ms 150.179 ms 149.445 ms
12 ae-2.r30.tokyjp05.jp.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.5.23) 149.396 ms 150.091 ms 148.034 ms
13 ae-4.r24.tkokhk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.51) 191.281 ms 191.223 ms 191.175 ms
14 ae-1.r00.tkokhk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.125) 191.907 ms 191.849 ms 191.003 ms
15 ae-0.a00.tkokhk01.hk.bb.gin.ntt.net (129.250.2.128) 190.895 ms 190.887 ms 190.840 ms
16 ix-ae-24-0.tcore1.HK2-Hong-Kong.as6453.net (180.87.112.153) 275.634 ms 275 .162 ms 276.571 ms
17 if-et-17-3.hcore1.KV8-Chiba.as6453.net (180.87.112.46) 247.347 ms if-ae-5-2 .tcore1.TV2-Tokyo.as6453.net (180.87.112.206) 273.712 ms 273.651 ms
18 if-et-21-2.hcore1.KV8-Chiba.as6453.net (120.29.217.67) 240.780 ms 236.865 ms if-ae-24-2.tcore2.PDI-Palo-Alto.as6453.net (66.198.144.56) 274.244 ms
19 if-ae-5-2.tcore2.SQN-San-Jose.as6453.net (64.86.21.1) 247.380 ms 246.416 m s if-ae-24-2.tcore2.PDI-Palo-Alto.as6453.net (66.198.144.56) 272.283 ms
20 if-ae-5-2.tcore2.SQN-San-Jose.as6453.net (64.86.21.1) 239.513 ms if-ae-1-2. tcore1.SQN-San-Jose.as6453.net (63.243.205.1) 282.360 ms 282.331 ms
21 216.6.33.122 (216.6.33.122) 246.564 ms 236.428 ms 238.035 ms
22 92.223.120.164 (92.223.120.164) 274.160 ms 216.6.33.122 (216.6.33.122) 239 .847 ms 92.223.120.163 (92.223.120.163) 252.128 ms
23 92.223.120.163 (92.223.120.163) 245.217 ms * *
24 * * *

 

 

Compare this to Voyager:

 

 

mmurphy@sever:~ $ traceroute 162.213.61.115
traceroute to 162.213.61.115 (162.213.61.115), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.2.1 (192.168.2.1) 1.257 ms 0.972 ms 1.164 ms
2 114.23.3.254 (114.23.3.254) 25.042 ms 25.306 ms 25.631 ms
3 ae-0-942.cr1.mdr.vygr.net (114.23.3.248) 25.522 ms 25.800 ms 25.695 ms
4 114.23.3.243 (114.23.3.243) 25.974 ms 25.860 ms 26.091 ms
5 ten-0-7-0-5-396.bdr04.alb01.akl.vocus.net.nz (175.45.93.77) 27.186 ms 29.158 ms 29.044 ms
6 bundle-11.cor01.alb01.akl.vocus.net.nz (114.31.202.48) 160.855 ms 158.664 ms 158.829 ms
7 bundle-200.cor01.lax01.ca.vocus.net (114.31.202.45) 158.324 ms 157.987 ms 157.807 ms
8 100g-0-1-0-0.cor01.sjc01.ca.vocus.net (49.255.255.0) 158.489 ms 158.376 ms 158.693 ms
9 ten-2-0-0.bdr01.sjc02.ca.vocus.net (114.31.199.181) 158.578 ms 158.476 ms 158.684 ms
10 eqix-sj-sv5.gcore.lu (206.223.116.232) 161.427 ms 161.317 ms 161.554 ms
11 sv4-a9006-edge-1-be20-2000.fe.core.pw (92.223.120.130) 160.252 ms 158.810 ms 159.074 ms
12 92.223.120.164 (92.223.120.164) 158.981 ms 92.223.120.163 (92.223.120.163) 159.207 ms 92.223.120.164 (92.223.120.164) 158.757 ms
13 * * *

 

 

But I stand by saying this can happen to literally any ISP and I am sure Spark will get this resolved...

 

Amosnz:

 

@michaelmurfy Usually your comments are helpful and insightful but when you offer opinions like "I wouldn't imagine that a ping difference of a few ms would make much of a difference to a game like WoT" perhaps you should refrain. 

 

The OP mention an increase of ~150 ms, and while World of Warships (the game the OP originally mentioned) is less affected by latency than World of Tanks (WoWS firing is generally a lot longer range than WoT) 150ms would be noticeable.

 

I stand by my comments, as they are observations from real world usage. The only thing I didn't go into is that traceroutes are only showing how your data is getting to the destination, not how the destination gets data back to you.  Sometimes that can be a completely different route (and impossible for your ISP to correct if its a higher latency path).

 

Yes my apologies I did read that statement incorrectly (end of day at work and all that). I agree, a jump of 150ms will be noticeable but I initially read it as a ~60ms jump in latency.





Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Want to be with an epic ISP? Want $20 to join them too? Well, use this link to sign up to BigPipe!
The Router Guide | Electric KiwiCommunity UniFi Cloud Controller | Ubiquiti Edgerouter Tutorial


359 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 72

Subscriber

  Reply # 1784904 19-May-2017 18:07
Send private message quote this post

 

 

michaelmurfy:

 

Amosnz: Then I moved to Spark who with a lot more customers require a lot more bandwidth, and found their focus is on providing capacity at low cost rather than the lowest possible latency.  When UFB became available I moved to another smaller ISP (where I also know someone) and once again have never had a problem getting increased pings looked into and corrected..

 

Global Gateway is used by many NZ ISP's and is considered a "premium" product (however as others rightfully pointed out sometimes not the best). Pings are normally quite low however the issue the OP is having can happen on any ISP. I can confirm I am getting the same route on a couple of other ISP's also using Global Gateway.

 

The reason I say this is slower downloads are more noticeable to the average user than latency.  A person who knows nothing about the internet can look at a download and say "I'm getting 150 number now but sometimes i get 600 number".  So having larger capacity (even if its on higher latency/longer links) generally is better.

 

I haven't used Spark since about October 2014 so things may have changed since then.

 

 





Speedtest

5625 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 764

Trusted
Subscriber

  Reply # 1784905 19-May-2017 18:09
Send private message quote this post

For what it's worth, here's the same server on Vibe:

 


traceroute to 162.213.61.115 (162.213.61.115), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 10.0.1.1 (10.0.1.1) 0.379 ms 0.358 ms 0.292 ms
2 * * *
3 lt-2-0-10-3.mdr-cr1.as45177.net.nz (14.1.50.36) 6.893 ms 6.364 ms 7.896 ms
4 equinix-sv1.as45177.net (206.223.116.96) 141.700 ms 143.185 ms 155.805 ms
5 eqix-sj-sv5.gcore.lu (206.223.116.232) 142.057 ms 142.615 ms 143.910 ms
6 sv5-a9006-edge-1-be20-2000.fe.core.pw (92.223.120.131) 143.367 ms 144.005 ms
144.027 ms
7 92.223.120.164 (92.223.120.164) 144.204 ms 142.578 ms 144.254 ms
8 * * *


3038 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 858

Subscriber

  Reply # 1784907 19-May-2017 18:15
One person supports this post
Send private message quote this post

Azzura:

Linux:


Sorry but it's more a mind thing than a slight change in latency


Linux



 


What study did you read that in?



There is no need for a study to tell us that this change in latency has no major adversw affects on tcp/udp traffic.

However, the placebo effect is well studied and that little "ping meter" or "bars" has a great affect on people's perception.

796 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 224

Trusted

  Reply # 1784914 19-May-2017 18:39
Send private message quote this post

FWIW: 
Vodafone UFB Auckland: 162.213.61.115

 

Host Loss% Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev

 

1. 10.0.2.2 0.0% 31 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.0

 

2. 192.168.1.1 0.0% 31 1.5 2.1 1.2 4.3 0.4

 

3. 203-118-183-254.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz 0.0% 30 5.5 23.9 5.5 88.9 19.7

 

4. 10.123.80.70 0.0% 30 7.5 23.3 5.1 68.3 18.8

 

5. 10.123.80.69 6.7% 30 131.6 144.2 129.0 192.1 19.2

 

6. v422.core1.sjc1.he.net 0.0% 30 138.2 153.7 129.6 200.4 20.7

 

7. 100ge1-1.core1.sjc2.he.net 0.0% 30 140.4 147.6 128.5 195.9 17.3

 

8. eqix-sj-sv5.gcore.lu 0.0% 30 137.4 146.8 130.5 214.0 21.4

 

9. sv4-a9006-edge-1-be20-2000.fe.core.pw 0.0% 30 134.6 138.9 130.0 170.0 9.3

 

10. 92.223.120.164 0.0% 30 130.7 146.0 130.5 209.6 17.6

 

11. sv4-sl-b115.fe.core.pw 0.0% 30 130.9 145.0 129.1 184.4 14.3






39 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 2


  Reply # 1785974 22-May-2017 14:10
Send private message quote this post

While no IP routing is guaranteed, one must wonder why the international gateway routers are not using the most direct routes over Southern Crossing with fewer hops. Routes via Sydney are OK as only marginally longer.
Is this capacity too expensive ? SC have always maintained there was plenty of capacity (hence no new cable system required) but the market disagrees and a new cable system is finally under construction. Lets hope this increase in capacity (a hopefully lower costs) will mean direct AKL > West Coast hops will advertise lower costs than round the Pacific routes.
We live in hope

809 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 158


  Reply # 1785978 22-May-2017 14:36
Send private message quote this post

Scotdownunder: While no IP routing is guaranteed, one must wonder why the international gateway routers are not using the most direct routes over Southern Crossing with fewer hops. Routes via Sydney are OK as only marginally longer.
Is this capacity too expensive ? SC have always maintained there was plenty of capacity (hence no new cable system required) but the market disagrees and a new cable system is finally under construction. Lets hope this increase in capacity (a hopefully lower costs) will mean direct AKL > West Coast hops will advertise lower costs than round the Pacific routes.
We live in hope

 

I don't think Spark are actively or purposefully routing this traffic via Hong Kong/Asia. Rather it is likely Wargaming have engaged their network partner/s to pick up as much of their gaming traffic from IXPs/ISPs in the Asian region as possible and send it to them over their own private transit links across the Pacific. It is likely Spark has been lumped into this group of Asian ISPs as they will also have their own arrangement for traffic into the Asian region.

 

 

It is really up to either or both parties to make tweaks to such a policy to give mutual customers the best experience.

1396 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 415

Trusted

  Reply # 1785981 22-May-2017 14:46
Send private message quote this post

seems the routing for this IP has been restored to its normal path.





1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Nothing nebulous about Microsoft’s cloud-transition
Posted 21-Jul-2017 15:34


We’re spending more on tech, but not as much as Australians
Posted 21-Jul-2017 11:43


Endace announces EndaceFabric for network-wide packet recording
Posted 20-Jul-2017 20:49


Acorn 6: MacOS image editing for the rest of us
Posted 20-Jul-2017 17:04


HTC faces backlash over keyboard pop-up ads
Posted 19-Jul-2017 15:53


BNZ adds Visa credit cards to Android Pay wallet
Posted 18-Jul-2017 19:44


Still living in a Notification hell – Om Malik
Posted 18-Jul-2017 13:00


Duet Display uses iPad to extend Mac, PC
Posted 18-Jul-2017 10:58


PC sales could be worse
Posted 17-Jul-2017 07:34


Crypto-currencies, tulips, market bubbles
Posted 17-Jul-2017 06:38


NZ Tech Podcast: Big batteries, solar cars, cold war, IoT
Posted 16-Jul-2017 16:53


Vodafone Australia mulls Wisp alliance, NZ implications
Posted 13-Jul-2017 16:49


Rural health professionals see fibre pay-off
Posted 13-Jul-2017 11:52


Vodafone announces expansion of $5 Daily Roaming
Posted 13-Jul-2017 10:20


Intel unveils powerful Intel Xeon Scalable processors
Posted 12-Jul-2017 20:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.