Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




681 posts

Ultimate Geek


# 216649 6-Jul-2017 13:00
Send private message

In early 2015 (I believe it was January) I purchased a iPhone 6 from Spark.

 

On the 01/02/16 I my iPhone 6 was sent away for repair by Spark. It had developed an issue where calls were sounding distant. The staff member noted that the camera had moved internally and seemed to imply that he had seen this issue before. It sounds like this is related to a manufacturing defect.

 

On the 09/02/16 I was notified my phone was back. A staff member let me know that it was a replacement phone.

 

As of early last month (June 2017) this issue has occurred again. On the 5th of July I attempted to take this back to the Spark store for repair, however they have refused to send it away for assessment or fix this issue at their cost as it is now out of their 24 month warranty (from the original purchase date).

 


I should also note that I am very careful with my phones, they are always in a case. I treat them with care, I have never had a screen protector on any one of my phones and have never had a broken screen. The phone has no physical damage.

 


I have subsiquently contacted multiple managers at Spark and put through a complaint via their website (at a managers recommendation) to only get told that they will only honor the 24 month warranty from the original purcahse date (despite my phone being replaced).

 

 

 

 

 

I have been told multiple times that the Consumer Gurantees Act does not cover me for this (it is illegal to mislead some one to their rights under the act) and have faced no end of issues trying to speak to some one out of the bounds of their strict policies that can see reason.

 

 

 

I have loged a dispute with the Telecommunication Dispute Resolution (TDR) scheme which seem to be able to hear these issues. 

 

 

 

My reasoning is as follows:

 

1) As per the Consumer Gurantees Act, the goods should be of acceptable quality. A phone such as a iPhone 6 which was one of the most expensive phones that you could buy at the time should be of acceptable quality to last for this period without needing multiple repairs.

 

2) As per the Consumer Gurantees Act (19 subsection 2) "the replacement goods shall, for the purposes of this Act, be deemed to be supplied by the supplier and the guarantees and obligations arising under this Act consequent upon a supply of goods to a consumer shall apply to the replacement goods." The replacement phone should have a new implied warranty which should last (by Spark's own definition) at least 2 years.

 

3) As per the Consumer Gurantees Act the goods should last a resonable lifetime. I would also argue that only 2 years and 6 months is not a resonable liftime for a top of the line Apple iPhone and no one would reasonably buy this device knowning that it might only last this period.

 

 

 

 

 

All up I am very disappointed in how this has been handled, but it seems to be very common place in the industry, so a question for everyone here.

 

 

 

Do you think it is acceptable for a iPhone (purchased new) to last only 2.5 years?


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
14417 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 1813799 6-Jul-2017 13:12
Send private message

Search the Apple support pages I am sure Apple admitted there was a fault with iPhone 6 affecting the cameras and were fixing them at no cost. That would indicate a design or manufacturing fault and Spark are required to get this fixed or replaced. Talk to the Commerce Commission they will advise you.





Mike
Retired IT Manager. 
The views stated in my posts are my personal views and not that of any other organisation.

 

There is no planet B

 

 


Mr Snotty
8940 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1813807 6-Jul-2017 13:22
2 people support this post
Send private message

Here we go again...

Phones have moved from a 1 to a 2 year warranty very recently as per the obligations under the CGA - the CGA states specifically that the phones should last around 2 years. After that, where it be a day or a month it is considered out of warranty. Spark in this case are adhering to their CGA obligations. Phones go through a very rough life with being in your pocket / bag and even around humid environments so even though you've looked after your phone there are other factors that come in to play.

 

If this was a fault that Apple have admitted to you may have more luck contacting Apple directly but in this case Spark are under no obligation to do anything with this case.





 
 
 
 


5611 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1813811 6-Jul-2017 13:28
8 people support this post
Send private message

michaelmurfy:

 

[snip]the CGA states specifically that the phones should last around 2 years.

 

 

I'm sorry, but that is incorrect. The Act is available here and there is no section that defines the expected lifespan of a phone.


Mr Snotty
8940 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1813816 6-Jul-2017 13:34
Send private message

RunningMan:

 

michaelmurfy:

 

[snip]the CGA states specifically that the phones should last around 2 years.

 

 

I'm sorry, but that is incorrect. The Act is available here and there is no section that defines the expected lifespan of a phone.

 

Not quite. There was a list on the Consumer website (I can't find it now) that listed phones as having a 2 year average lifespan under the CGA and this is why retailers moved from 1yr to 2yr warranties on mobiles. It has also been explained around here quite a few times too. The CGA is there to also support the retailer.







681 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1813823 6-Jul-2017 13:39
3 people support this post
Send private message

michaelmurfy:

 

Here we go again...

Phones have moved from a 1 to a 2 year warranty very recently as per the obligations under the CGA - the CGA states specifically that the phones should last around 2 years. After that, where it be a day or a month it is considered out of warranty. Spark in this case are adhering to their CGA obligations. Phones go through a very rough life with being in your pocket / bag and even around humid environments so even though you've looked after your phone there are other factors that come in to play.

 

If this was a fault that Apple have admitted to you may have more luck contacting Apple directly but in this case Spark are under no obligation to do anything with this case.

 

 

This is incorrect as the act does not define a period as the period will depend on many factors including the value of the phone.

 

You have also missed the fact that this phone was replaced less than 2 years ago and hence they are not adhering to the CGA gurantee on the replacement phone.


5611 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1813828 6-Jul-2017 13:44
2 people support this post
Send private message

Perhaps this is the Consumer page you are looking for https://www.consumer.org.nz/articles/faulty-mobile-phones#article-warranty-periods

 

[snip]

 

It’s true smartphones can do a lot more than their predecessors. But the purpose of a mobile phone is still to be mobile. It’s meant to be carried with you – not kept in a glass case and taken out on special occasions – and it needs to be designed for this purpose.

 

The life you can expect from your phone will depend on its quality and how it’s treated. The good news is that our surveys show the majority of mobile phones are reliable. Our 2013 reliability survey found 91 percent of mobiles bought in the previous 3 years had never needed repair.

 

Whilst their survey is now 4 years old, it would suggest that the expected lifespan is higher than 2 years. There certainly isn't a hard cut off of 2 years in the legislation. The Consumer site seems to suggest that a high end, expensive, brand name phone could reasonably be expected to last longer than say a $30 no name brand phone - of course assuming the user has taken reasonable care of it during that time.


132 posts

Master Geek

Subscriber

  # 1813840 6-Jul-2017 14:01
One person supports this post
Send private message

IIRC, there's a difference between the warranty period (2 years) and the reasonable lifetime of the device (which could be longer, and where they still have obligations)


 
 
 
 


15269 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1813846 6-Jul-2017 14:08
4 people support this post
Send private message

michaelmurfy:

Here we go again...

Phones have moved from a 1 to a 2 year warranty very recently as per the obligations under the CGA - the CGA states specifically that the phones should last around 2 years. After that, where it be a day or a month it is considered out of warranty. Spark in this case are adhering to their CGA obligations. Phones go through a very rough life with being in your pocket / bag and even around humid environments so even though you've looked after your phone there are other factors that come in to play.


If this was a fault that Apple have admitted to you may have more luck contacting Apple directly but in this case Spark are under no obligation to do anything with this case.



That is simply incorrect imo. The manufacturers warrenty has little to do with the CGA as they are different things. If phones were restricted to a 2 year CGA coverage then it would be written into the legislation. The CGA coverage is done on a case by case basis and depends on the Products value, the amount of use it has had and how it has been treated etc. Eg not everyone just chicks their phone around or drops out. They are also required to be durable and free from minor defects. So a $1500 phone should last longer than a phone worth $100 as a $1500 phone implies superior quality and better build quality.
If you believe the CGA only provides coverage for 2 years on phones like the iPhone, please provide evidence of this. You say this is a recent move but what actual legislation is that based on.



681 posts

Ultimate Geek


  # 1813851 6-Jul-2017 14:19
Send private message

I have to hand it to Apple. They are the first company I have seen that actually clearly documents the Consumer Guarantees Act and does  not try and hide your rights. See - https://www.apple.com/nz/legal/statutory-warranty/

 

 


15269 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1813861 6-Jul-2017 14:30
Send private message

ArcticSilver:

I have to hand it to Apple. They are the first company I have seen that actually clearly documents the Consumer Guarantees Act and does  not try and hide your rights. See - https://www.apple.com/nz/legal/statutory-warranty/


 



Except is it 100% correct? It says who should you contact-The seller. However shouldn't it also say the manufacturer as an alternative?

166 posts

Master Geek


  # 1813869 6-Jul-2017 14:40
One person supports this post
Send private message

I've found Apple Support much more helpful than any store in NZ when it comes to warranty and CGA claims - give them a call on 0800 1 27753 and explain your situation and the previous repair and see what they say.

1046 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1813953 6-Jul-2017 15:35
Send private message

mattwnz:
ArcticSilver:

 

I have to hand it to Apple. They are the first company I have seen that actually clearly documents the Consumer Guarantees Act and does  not try and hide your rights. See - https://www.apple.com/nz/legal/statutory-warranty/

 

 

 

 

 



Except is it 100% correct? It says who should you contact-The seller. However shouldn't it also say the manufacturer as an alternative?

 

 

 

First point of contact for CGA claim should be the retailer that you paid, if in the event that you cannot contact them or out of business etc, then it goes to manufacturer. But I have heard some good stories with Apple and they take customer service seriously. 


15269 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1813958 6-Jul-2017 15:40
Send private message

ArcticSilver:

 

 

 

 

 

I have loged a dispute with the Telecommunication Dispute Resolution (TDR) scheme which seem to be able to hear these issues. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How long do the TDR normally take to look into things?


4433 posts

Uber Geek


  # 1813962 6-Jul-2017 15:45
One person supports this post
Send private message

michaelmurfy:

 

Here we go again...

Phones have moved from a 1 to a 2 year warranty very recently as per the obligations under the CGA - the CGA states specifically that the phones should last around 2 years. After that, where it be a day or a month it is considered out of warranty. Spark in this case are adhering to their CGA obligations. Phones go through a very rough life with being in your pocket / bag and even around humid environments so even though you've looked after your phone there are other factors that come in to play.

 

If this was a fault that Apple have admitted to you may have more luck contacting Apple directly but in this case Spark are under no obligation to do anything with this case.

 

 

You are not being serious right?  Oh if only the CGA did lay out a schedule of devices and expected lifetimes. 

 

 My iphone was nearly 2 and a half years old and spark refused to repair it.   In the end they caved but only after going through a protracted fight that 90% of people wouldn't bother with. 

 

There are disputes tribunals hearings of telcos being ordered to fix 4 year old phones (although i think it may have been 5 from memory). Although, a 5 year old phone shouldn't run modern apps but it should work as a phone. 

 

And, in my case it was awful, they replaced my iphone with another faulty one .   I guess spark win in the end because I couldn't be bothered going through that again.  

 

 

 

 


Mr Snotty
8940 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 1814055 6-Jul-2017 18:47
Send private message

@surfisup1000 yes I was being serious. These are the guidelines that have been given to retailers regarding mobile devices but there are always people who think their phones should last a lifetime. Spark in this case are adhering to their portion of the CGA no matter how you argue it. The CGA is there to also help protect retailers. I would agree with let's say a laptop or large appliance but I've worked for retail with mobile in the past, I know what kind of crap some phones go through and yet the customer still expects them to be let's say run over by a lawnmower.

Not kidding. I've seen some horrific "CGA claims". This one to be honest isn't CGA as I said. It is simply with Apple especially if it is a known defect.

People are quick on pointing out what benefits them while ignoring what is there for the retailer.




 1 | 2
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Switch your broadband provider now - compare prices


Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Samsung Galaxy Fold now available in New Zealand
Posted 6-Dec-2019 00:01


NZ company oDocs awarded US$ 100,000 Dubai World Expo grant
Posted 5-Dec-2019 16:00


New Zealand Rugby Selects AWS-Powered Analytics for Deeper Game Insights
Posted 5-Dec-2019 11:33


IMAGR and Farro bring checkout-less supermarket shopping to New Zealand
Posted 5-Dec-2019 09:07


Wellington Airport becomes first 5G connected airport in the country
Posted 3-Dec-2019 08:42


MetService secures Al Jazeera as a new weather client
Posted 28-Nov-2019 09:40


NZ a top 10 connected nation with stage one of ultra-fast broadband roll-out completed
Posted 24-Nov-2019 14:15


Microsoft Translator understands te reo Māori
Posted 22-Nov-2019 08:46


Chorus to launch Hyperfibre service
Posted 18-Nov-2019 15:00


Microsoft launches first Experience Center worldwide for Asia Pacific in Singapore
Posted 13-Nov-2019 13:08


Disney+ comes to LG Smart TVs
Posted 13-Nov-2019 12:55


Spark launches new wireless broadband "Unplan Metro"
Posted 11-Nov-2019 08:19


Malwarebytes overhauls flagship product with new UI, faster engine and lighter footprint
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:48


CarbonClick launches into Digital Marketplaces
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:42


Kordia offers Microsoft Azure Peering Service
Posted 6-Nov-2019 11:41



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.