Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
13326 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 1587


  Reply # 1814060 6-Jul-2017 19:05
Send private message

michaelmurfy: @surfisup1000 yes I was being serious. These are the guidelines that have been given to retailers regarding mobile devices but there are always people who think their phones should last a lifetime. Spark in this case are adhering to their portion of the CGA no matter how you argue it. The CGA is there to also help protect retailers. I would agree with let's say a laptop or large appliance but I've worked for retail with mobile in the past, I know what kind of crap some phones go through and yet the customer still expects them to be let's say run over by a lawnmower.

Not kidding. I've seen some horrific "CGA claims". This one to be honest isn't CGA as I said. It is simply with Apple especially if it is a known defect.

People are quick on pointing out what benefits them while ignoring what is there for the retailer.

 

 

 

Who has actually given those guidelines to retailers? IANAL, but it appears retailers do risk breaching the law, if they try to mislead consumers over their rights. http://www.comcom.govt.nz/fair-trading/fair-trading-act-fact-sheets/misleading-consumers-about-their-rights/  Many manufacturers are based overseas so may not be aware of NZs consumer laws. I had one manufacturers overseas call centre staff tell me once that the NZ CGA was only 2 years, and I quickly corrected them.

 

Obviously something that has been damaged, eg dropped or run over by a lawn mower, or has visible dings from being dropped, is likely not to be covered by the CGA, if it is shown that that is the cause of the problem. But I would hope most people would be honest when they make a claim, and not try to hide or deny physical damage. Wear and tear is another one, but goods should be durable and fit for the purpose they have been designed for. eg spending a lot of time in pockets. 

 

The retailer also should never be out of pocket (apart from time costs), as a CGA claim should be reimbursed by the manufacturer. The retailer is just the middleman in this type of situation.


1054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 718

Subscriber

  Reply # 1814062 6-Jul-2017 19:20
19 people support this post
Send private message

michaelmurfy: @surfisup1000 yes I was being serious. These are the guidelines that have been given to retailers regarding mobile devices but there are always people who think their phones should last a lifetime. Spark in this case are adhering to their portion of the CGA no matter how you argue it. The CGA is there to also help protect retailers. I would agree with let's say a laptop or large appliance but I've worked for retail with mobile in the past, I know what kind of crap some phones go through and yet the customer still expects them to be let's say run over by a lawnmower.

Not kidding. I've seen some horrific "CGA claims". This one to be honest isn't CGA as I said. It is simply with Apple especially if it is a known defect.

People are quick on pointing out what benefits them while ignoring what is there for the retailer.

 

I am sorry but you really need to stop making stuff up and posting blatantly wrong legal advice.  At the risk of alienating the usual crowd here, I very much doubt that (1) you're a lawyer; (2) that you have held senior risk/legislative compliance roles with multiple listed companies, and (3) have advised both retailers and consumers on the Consumer Guarantees Act. I have done all three.

 

There is no legally enforceable, definitive "guidelines" (these wouldn't be called guidelines if they were authoritative) that says a mobile phone need only last 2 years to meet the CGA. As I said to Steve Bibble here, when it comes to these outrageous claims that are easily proved or disproved, action speaks a lot louder than words. He never found the Commerce Commission's supposed guidelines because they don't exist. What some retailer publishes also doesn't matter.

 

More importantly, your assertion that "It is simply with Apple especially if it is a known defect" is outrageously wrong. The Consumer Guarantees Act is absolutely clear on this - this is basic, elementary knowledge of responsible citizenship given how widely available this information is. Section 16 sets out the circumstances under which consumers have a right of redress against suppliers. These circumstances include failing to meet the tests for acceptable quality under s 6. Supplier is then defined under s 2 as follows:

 

 

 

 supplier—

 

(a)
means a person who, in trade,—
(i)
supplies goods to a consumer by—
(a)
transferring the ownership or the possession of the goods under a contract of sale, exchange, lease, hire, or hire purchase to which that person is a party; ... 

 

On what planet would "a known defect" somehow not give the OP a claim against Spark but provide him with a viable claim against Apple? Being a mod shouldn't exempt you from doing the right thing by other posters, especially the less sophisticated ones who might take your words far too seriously (they would be foolish to, however, given what my simple analysis shows regarding your level of understanding of the CGA. You really should withdraw your post, especially given the vehemence with which you have asserted that the other posters are wrong and the implication that their beliefs and demands are excessive or frivolous.


 
 
 
 


719 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 48


  Reply # 1814087 6-Jul-2017 19:39
3 people support this post
Send private message

dejadeadnz:

michaelmurfy: @surfisup1000 yes I was being serious. These are the guidelines that have been given to retailers regarding mobile devices but there are always people who think their phones should last a lifetime. Spark in this case are adhering to their portion of the CGA no matter how you argue it. The CGA is there to also help protect retailers. I would agree with let's say a laptop or large appliance but I've worked for retail with mobile in the past, I know what kind of crap some phones go through and yet the customer still expects them to be let's say run over by a lawnmower.

Not kidding. I've seen some horrific "CGA claims". This one to be honest isn't CGA as I said. It is simply with Apple especially if it is a known defect.

People are quick on pointing out what benefits them while ignoring what is there for the retailer.


I am sorry but you really need to stop making stuff up and posting blatantly wrong legal advice.  At the risk of alienating the usual crowd here, I very much doubt that (1) you're a lawyer; (2) that you have held senior risk/legislative compliance roles with multiple listed companies, and (3) have advised both retailers and consumers on the Consumer Guarantees Act. I have done all three.


There is no legally enforceable, definitive "guidelines" (these wouldn't be called guidelines if they were authoritative) that says a mobile phone need only last 2 years to meet the CGA. As I said to Steve Bibble here, when it comes to these outrageous claims that are easily proved or disproved, action speaks a lot louder than words. He never found the Commerce Commission's supposed guidelines because they don't exist. What some retailer publishes also doesn't matter.


More importantly, your assertion that "It is simply with Apple especially if it is a known defect" is outrageously wrong. The Consumer Guarantees Act is absolutely clear on this - this is basic, elementary knowledge of responsible citizenship given how widely available this information is. Section 16 sets out the circumstances under which consumers have a right of redress against suppliers. These circumstances include failing to meet the tests for acceptable quality under s 6. Supplier is then defined under s 2 as follows:


 


 supplier—


(a)
means a person who, in trade,—
(i)
supplies goods to a consumer by—
(a)
transferring the ownership or the possession of the goods under a contract of sale, exchange, lease, hire, or hire purchase to which that person is a party; ... 


On what planet would "a known defect" somehow not give the OP a claim against Spark but provide him with a viable claim against Apple? Being a mod shouldn't exempt you from doing the right thing by other posters, especially the less sophisticated ones who might take your words far too seriously (they would be foolish to, however, given what my simple analysis shows regarding your level of understanding of the CGA. You really should withdraw your post, especially given the vehemence with which you have asserted that the other posters are wrong and the implication that their beliefs and demands are excessive or frivolous.



+1 to you.. I so wanted to reply but was on mobile and did not make the effort. You have summed it up very nicely.

344 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 22


  Reply # 1814088 6-Jul-2017 19:39
Send private message

Cant say for sure but would be certainly confident that all the major NZ retailers and the three teir one telco's know their position on the CGA.

1054 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 718

Subscriber

  Reply # 1814090 6-Jul-2017 19:43
2 people support this post
Send private message

johny99: Cant say for sure but would be certainly confident that all the major NZ retailers and the three teir one telco's know their position on the CGA.

 

Examples abound on here to show that that these telcos don't. Heck, look at my posting history to see a few free CGA and law lessons I doled out to a few telco reps on here.

 

Anyone who has ever worked in compliance roles will tell you that your average staff members in most corporates are legally clueless. I can tolerate people not understanding the law but I have zero tolerance for anyone strongly asserting legal positions unless they have a basis for them. In fact, I wouldn't mind it for there to be a law that makes deliberately or recklessly misleading a consumer about his/her CGA rights a criminal offence. It will teach quite a few of people in retail a lesson or two to see one or two of these BSers sent to jail or given hours of community work for this kind of outrageous conduct.

 

 

 

 

 

 


344 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 22


  Reply # 1814117 6-Jul-2017 19:48
Send private message

Sorry should have clarified, I wasn't meaning the guys on the floor.



655 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 104


  Reply # 1814124 6-Jul-2017 20:27
Send private message

Thank you dejadeadnz.

 

 


BDFL - Memuneh
59069 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 10341

Administrator
Trusted
Geekzone
Subscriber

  Reply # 1814125 6-Jul-2017 20:32
4 people support this post
Send private message

I am locking this because I think we have the answer. You have to seek your rights either with the retailer or through legal means if you must.





1 | 2 
Filter this topic showing only the reply marked as answer View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

New Zealand Ministry of Education chooses Unisys for cloud-based education resourcing management system
Posted 22-Nov-2017 22:00


Business analytics software powers profits for NZ wine producers
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:52


Pyrios strikes up alliance with Microsoft integrator UC Logiq
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:51


The New Zealand IT services ecosystem - it's all digital down here
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:49


Volvo to supply tens of thousands of autonomous drive compatible cars to Uber
Posted 22-Nov-2017 21:46


From small to medium and beyond: Navigating the ERP battlefield
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:12


Business owners: ERP software selection starts (and finishes) with you
Posted 21-Nov-2017 21:11


Why I'm not an early adopter
Posted 21-Nov-2017 10:39


Netatmo launches smart home products in New Zealand
Posted 20-Nov-2017 20:06


Huawei Mate 10: Punchy, long battery life, artificial intelligence
Posted 20-Nov-2017 16:30


Propel launch Disney Star Wars Laser Battle Drones
Posted 19-Nov-2017 21:26


UFB killer app: Speed
Posted 17-Nov-2017 17:01


The case for RSS — MacSparky
Posted 13-Nov-2017 14:35


WordPress and Indieweb: Take control of your online presence — 6:30 GridAKL Nov 30
Posted 11-Nov-2017 13:43


Chorus reveals technology upgrade for schools, students
Posted 10-Nov-2017 10:28



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.