![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
mattwnz:
I can see a Fair Go story coming up...
There will be no fair go story, whole Chorus is regulated, RSPs can pick and choose what services they do or don't provide on Chorus infrastructure - if you don't like the offering by one RSP simply move
Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
cokemaster: I understand that Spark does have the means of detecting copper voice / copper PSTN based medical alarms.
They should ideally be putting those customers into a high care journey rather than mass market.
mattwnz:
I can see a Fair Go story coming up...
nztim:mattwnz:I can see a Fair Go story coming up...
There will be no fair go story, whole Chorus is regulated, RSPs can pick and choose what services they do or don't provide on Chorus infrastructure - if you don't like the offering by one RSP simply move
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster: The way these medical devices operate over PSTN is definitely trackable as they leave a distinct fingerprint. It comes down to an effort as opposed to technical capability.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster: Yes. There are a few moving pieces telcos need to factor in:
- Defer Wireless Voice in favour of baseband voice and prolong current implementation.
- do nothing, roll the dice and hope existing medical alarm service works with their wireless voice solution. Obviously has the risk of creating a body count for such a migration.
- identify customers who use medical alarms over PSTN and have a conversation with them on alternative solutions. Eg. 3G medical alarms or IP medical alarms (if they exist).
What route they choose is up to them but I’d strongly recommend reaching out to family members with medical alarms and copper.
Spark should implement a special migration team for these customers, but again the customer should have final say. Family should be informed of the proposed changes, with being able to talk to the relative about the situation and requirements, working to choose the best solution.
cokemaster: It’s also worth noting that there are no barriers stopping Spark from offering a baseband voice solution. Many of the technical components required are also required for offering existing Fibre and Wireless Voice.
It is predominantly a commercial decision to avoid paying LFC/Chorus input pricing that coincided with the age of the NEAX’s.
It would be the easiest option for the customer, with no changes on premise to use BBIP, however Spark being Spark - this would not be a financially viable solution. Current copper charges are ~$55 for BB Copper, whereas I am pretty sure it is the same for the rest of the options. It all comes down to profit over people, but that's just business. I am sure Spark could sacrifice some of their profit for their long standing and loyal superannuant customers, just as they do with their "Gold Talker" over-65's mobile plans (https://www.spark.co.nz/shop/mobile-plans/gold-plans.html) but I do understand that have larger profit margins being delivered over their own network.
If only it could be left status quo for the benefit of these customers.
The issue is that installing new VoIP line cards/ISAM-V for ~300k lines when they're losing voice customers at ~100k/year is commercially untenable. It would probably be a 9-figure project.
SomeoneSomewhere:
The issue is that installing new VoIP line cards/ISAM-V for ~300k lines when they're losing voice customers at ~100k/year is commercially untenable. It would probably be a 9-figure project.
They are only loosing customers because of forced migration. If they didn't announce that they would be decommissioning the NEAX and that customers have to move to new technologies, the decline in voice customers would not be as great.
richms:
Here's the date. Use the box we provided or change provider. On that date either close the account or move the number to the 4g box.
Tell that to those in Miramar.... that has dragged on and on for over 7 months now
Any views expressed on these forums are my own and don't necessarily reflect those of my employer.
halper86:
SomeoneSomewhere:
The issue is that installing new VoIP line cards/ISAM-V for ~300k lines when they're losing voice customers at ~100k/year is commercially untenable. It would probably be a 9-figure project.
They are only loosing customers because of forced migration. If they didn't announce that they would be decommissioning the NEAX and that customers have to move to new technologies, the decline in voice customers would not be as great.
NEAX is screwed. I would use stronger terms but they're not allowed here.
Rumours I heard is they were bidding on eBay for obsolete spares to keep the equipment going more than a decade ago, and the only reason they're still running is the reducing number of customers is letting them cannibalise the bits that are still working but no longer needed.
Remember that the NEAXs are 1980s computer equipment.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |