Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 
99 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 339202 8-Jun-2010 01:41
Send private message

freitasm:
tunafish: If the XT network had a radio controller in the UK, great ad, if it doesn't all it emplies is that 3G networks in the UK are reliable, he should have been by a lake in the South Island of NZ, for gods sake this is where XT was having a problem. Paul should be sucking up to users where most pain was felt, maybe Paul had a job interview to go to in the UK.


The ad was filmed by a lake in the South Island. Your comments are wrong and misleading.


Wanaka to be correct GELNORCHY RIVER

99 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 339204 8-Jun-2010 01:55
Send private message

i HATE TELESCUM WITH A VENGANCE, but they are a major supplier of the Multinational I work for.
All the same a fart is always a fart and a rose is always a rose so why try reading so much into a puffery advert?

Telecom are fair to rights to bag when they get it wrong or for the many anti-competitive activities they try but they are still held to account by the rules and law of this country.

The company has an obligation which is enshrined in legislation to make the best return for shareholders, they are not a govt charity.

Get over the paranoia and susspessions stop trying to out guess everyone and realize, in adverts it doesnt matter where it is or what it is, it is how well it is presented and how many people believe it. So if the Xt add had been shoot in Scotland or South Affrica would it have really mattered a dam?

I thought the add well done, Brave, and topical, how ever it lacked any technical detail but that is to be expected when it is aimed at joe blogs or dim wits who have nothing better to do than work out how to try and rip Telecom or find holes in there adds.
Now Joe Public on the other hand probably were entertained and may even in the future consider XT and a supplier for them.

67 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 8


  Reply # 339234 8-Jun-2010 07:55
Send private message

arthurhh: i HATE TELESCUM WITH A VENGANCE, but they are a major supplier of the Multinational I work for.
All the same a fart is always a fart and a rose is always a rose so why try reading so much into a puffery advert?

Telecom are fair to rights to bag when they get it wrong or for the many anti-competitive activities they try but they are still held to account by the rules and law of this country.

The company has an obligation which is enshrined in legislation to make the best return for shareholders, they are not a govt charity.

Get over the paranoia and susspessions stop trying to out guess everyone and realize, in adverts it doesnt matter where it is or what it is, it is how well it is presented and how many people believe it. So if the Xt add had been shoot in Scotland or South Affrica would it have really mattered a dam?

I thought the add well done, Brave, and topical, how ever it lacked any technical detail but that is to be expected when it is aimed at joe blogs or dim wits who have nothing better to do than work out how to try and rip Telecom or find holes in there adds.
Now Joe Public on the other hand probably were entertained and may even in the future consider XT and a supplier for them.

Whats TELECOM done to you that you hate them with a vengance?

7875 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 790

Subscriber

  Reply # 339235 8-Jun-2010 08:18
Send private message

JamesN:
arthurhh: i HATE TELESCUM WITH A VENGANCE, but they are a major supplier of the Multinational I work for.
All the same a fart is always a fart and a rose is always a rose so why try reading so much into a puffery advert?

Telecom are fair to rights to bag when they get it wrong or for the many anti-competitive activities they try but they are still held to account by the rules and law of this country.

The company has an obligation which is enshrined in legislation to make the best return for shareholders, they are not a govt charity.

Get over the paranoia and susspessions stop trying to out guess everyone and realize, in adverts it doesnt matter where it is or what it is, it is how well it is presented and how many people believe it. So if the Xt add had been shoot in Scotland or South Affrica would it have really mattered a dam?

I thought the add well done, Brave, and topical, how ever it lacked any technical detail but that is to be expected when it is aimed at joe blogs or dim wits who have nothing better to do than work out how to try and rip Telecom or find holes in there adds.
Now Joe Public on the other hand probably were entertained and may even in the future consider XT and a supplier for them.


Whats TELECOM done to you that you hate them with a vengance?


Most likely because it exists..  Some people are like that..




Regards,

Old3eyes


426 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 16

Trusted
Spark NZ
Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 339241 8-Jun-2010 08:40
Send private message

If you're looking for more technical detail you can find it here http://www.telecom.co.nz/insidext

If you're in Wellington next Tuesday and want to know mobile networks work then feel free to turn up to this: http://www.geekzone.co.nz/NealR/7258

Neal




The comments I write on this forum do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer and as such cannot be taken as official statements of my employer.

939 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 26


  Reply # 339352 8-Jun-2010 13:20
Send private message

JamesN:
arthurhh: i HATE TELESCUM WITH A VENGANCE, but they are a major supplier of the Multinational I work for.
All the same a fart is always a fart and a rose is always a rose so why try reading so much into a puffery advert?

Telecom are fair to rights to bag when they get it wrong or for the many anti-competitive activities they try but they are still held to account by the rules and law of this country.

The company has an obligation which is enshrined in legislation to make the best return for shareholders, they are not a govt charity.

Get over the paranoia and susspessions stop trying to out guess everyone and realize, in adverts it doesnt matter where it is or what it is, it is how well it is presented and how many people believe it. So if the Xt add had been shoot in Scotland or South Affrica would it have really mattered a dam?

I thought the add well done, Brave, and topical, how ever it lacked any technical detail but that is to be expected when it is aimed at joe blogs or dim wits who have nothing better to do than work out how to try and rip Telecom or find holes in there adds.
Now Joe Public on the other hand probably were entertained and may even in the future consider XT and a supplier for them.

Whats TELECOM done to you that you hate them with a vengance?
what I found interesting is arthurhh started off very negative here but as the post went on it become relatively more positive, thanks I enjoyed reading it




99 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 339483 8-Jun-2010 18:37
Send private message

dman:
JamesN:
arthurhh: i HATE TELESCUM WITH A VENGANCE, but they are a major supplier of the Multinational I work for.
All the same a fart is always a fart and a rose is always a rose so why try reading so much into a puffery advert?

Telecom are fair to rights to bag when they get it wrong or for the many anti-competitive activities they try but they are still held to account by the rules and law of this country.

The company has an obligation which is enshrined in legislation to make the best return for shareholders, they are not a govt charity.

Get over the paranoia and susspessions stop trying to out guess everyone and realize, in adverts it doesnt matter where it is or what it is, it is how well it is presented and how many people believe it. So if the Xt add had been shoot in Scotland or South Affrica would it have really mattered a dam?

I thought the add well done, Brave, and topical, how ever it lacked any technical detail but that is to be expected when it is aimed at joe blogs or dim wits who have nothing better to do than work out how to try and rip Telecom or find holes in there adds.
Now Joe Public on the other hand probably were entertained and may even in the future consider XT and a supplier for them.

Whats TELECOM done to you that you hate them with a vengance?
what I found interesting is arthurhh started off very negative here but as the post went on it become relatively more positive, thanks I enjoyed reading it


 I am negitive to Telecom, but only when they deserve it (IMHO most of the time)

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic

Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.