Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 
matt45
311 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #508729 18-Aug-2011 20:19
Send private message



Is Telecom planning to offer Naked DSL anytime soon? 

 


Why would they? as the PSTN is not a regulated product it costs telecom retail sweet f all. NDSL connections (on the telecom wholesale DSL network) actually all connect back to a POTS EN/Port/Linecard anyway its just not activated so you can't use it. Retail/Wholesale pay chorus the same price for the line/MPF regardless of what services they put over it so why not use the PSTN instead of just having it sit there.

I was on the telecom trial for their naked/voip service (aprox 1 year ago) which has since been shelved likley due to UFB. The existing equipment is capable of providing the service.

Going naked with another provider vs having a standard phone and DSL with another provider is only about $10 cheaper a month ... personally i would rather stick with the PSTN as its a lot more resilient to line faults and proven fairly stable over its lifespan which is what you want when there is a power outage and you need to call 111.

having said this ... PSTN is due for decommission 2020 and with UFB coming its days are numbered.


_________________ 

As for the zero-rated national traffic IMO i don't really care there isn't enough content that i get from NZ origin for it to make a difference. 

 
 
 
 

Get easy to use, easy to install Norton antivirus protection against advanced online threats (affiliate link).
matt45
311 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #508731 18-Aug-2011 20:21
Send private message

tr3v:
tr3v:
scuwp: 
Huh?  Why did you get charged more?  They didn't make any other changes to our plan other than increasing the data cap.  Did you change something else? 


I will reread my notice when I get home - I am certain there was a $5 increase. I am on a business plan, which now looks like it is called 'advanced'. So maybe I can now downgrade, and get some money back. 

Yup. $5 increase, but the letter does go on to suggest I look at the other plans should I want to change. 


I believe this is only if you are not on a "total home" or "total office" plan (could be wrong) but i think if you change to one of these plans you will get your $5 back.

firefuze
502 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #508751 18-Aug-2011 21:38
Send private message

Customers on Standalone Broadband plans will be seeing a $5 monthly price increase and an increase in data allowance aswel. Applies to standalone plans only, not Total Home plans. As below:

Go Plan 3GB $41 > 5GB $46
Explorer Plan 10GB $51 > 20GB $56
Adventure Plan 20GB $61 > 40GB $66
Pro Plan 40GB $81 > 60GB $86






tdgeek
28622 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #508761 18-Aug-2011 21:52
Send private message

While there are points raised over the standalone price changes, prior to the plan upgrades and price changes, the packages already offered best value.

There is no downside, you will not be encumbered with a contract to change from a seperate landline and broadband scenario to a package.

Cheers
Tony
Telecom

hangon
397 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #508951 19-Aug-2011 12:40
Send private message

I'd rather see total home broadband with $40 GB traffic and reduce price by say $15~$20.

That'd be some serious marketing. 

Maybe you didn't realize there is a huge gap in terms of traffic quota in Telecom's plans. Or you know that majority of customers won't use much of the extra $20 GB so it's NOT really an incentive at all. 

NonprayingMantis
6434 posts

Uber Geek


  #508963 19-Aug-2011 13:00
Send private message

hangon: I'd rather see total home broadband with $40 GB traffic and reduce price by say $15~$20.

That'd be some serious marketing. 

Maybe you didn't realize there is a huge gap in terms of traffic quota in Telecom's plans. Or you know that majority of customers won't use much of the extra $20 GB so it's NOT really an incentive at all. 


You can get plans with 2GB, 5GB, 10GB, 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 80GB, or 100GB.

where is the gap?


hangon
397 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #508968 19-Aug-2011 13:16
Send private message

NonprayingMantis:
hangon: I'd rather see total home broadband with $40 GB traffic and reduce price by say $15~$20.

That'd be some serious marketing. 

Maybe you didn't realize there is a huge gap in terms of traffic quota in Telecom's plans. Or you know that majority of customers won't use much of the extra $20 GB so it's NOT really an incentive at all. 


You can get plans with 2GB, 5GB, 10GB, 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 80GB, or 100GB.

where is the gap?


Apologies, my lack of observation then. Didn't drill down to total home starter menu, so it looked to me it's either 5 GB or 60 GB for bb + local calls.

Still, I'm shopping for a new plan with ~30GB - we've been using around 20 GB about every month in the last year - the plans would either fall short or waste money. You could call that picky.

And if I choose total home starter with 40GB the price would be $103 - this is a $2 difference with total home broadband BEFORE the so called incentive.

A $2 difference, sounds quite different from "we either doubled or added 20GB to pretty much all our current plans".

P.S.Telecom's Second-Half Adjusted Net Profit Climbs 66% 



NonprayingMantis
6434 posts

Uber Geek


  #508980 19-Aug-2011 13:40
Send private message

hangon:
NonprayingMantis:
hangon: I'd rather see total home broadband with $40 GB traffic and reduce price by say $15~$20.

That'd be some serious marketing. 

Maybe you didn't realize there is a huge gap in terms of traffic quota in Telecom's plans. Or you know that majority of customers won't use much of the extra $20 GB so it's NOT really an incentive at all. 


You can get plans with 2GB, 5GB, 10GB, 20GB, 40GB, 60GB, 80GB, or 100GB.

where is the gap?


Apologies, my lack of observation then. Didn't drill down to total home starter menu, so it looked to me it's either 5 GB or 60 GB for bb + local calls.

Still, I'm shopping for a new plan with ~30GB - we've been using around 20 GB about every month in the last year - the plans would either fall short or waste money. You could call that picky.

And if I choose total home starter with 40GB the price would be $103 - this is a $2 difference with total home broadband BEFORE the so called incentive.

A $2 difference, sounds quite different from "we either doubled or added 20GB to pretty much all our current plans".

P.S.Telecom's Second-Half Adjusted Net Profit Climbs 66% 


Total Home starter with 40GB was $123 before the datacap increase. Now it’s $103.  It’s effectively $20 cheaper than it used to be.

But,why would you want total home starter with 40GB when you can get 60GB on total home broadband and better calling rates for $2 more?

I'm still unsure what it is you are wanting?


and where did that headline on earnings come from? Year on year, net profit is up 1.6% adjusted for impariments, and DOWN over 50% before adjustments

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10746056

"Net profit was $166 million, or 9 cents per share, in the 12 months ended June 30, compared to $382 million, or 20 cents a share, a year earlier"



hangon
397 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #508996 19-Aug-2011 14:10
Send private message

Total Home starter with 40GB was $123 before the datacap increase. Now it’s $103.  It’s effectively $20 cheaper than it used to be.

But,why would you want total home starter with 40GB when you can get 60GB on total home broadband and better calling rates for $2 more?

I'm still unsure what it is you are wanting?


Why would anyone choose a starter with 40GB for $123, over a Total Home Broadband 40GB for $105 before the cap increase??? Seriously?

Now getting a same plan as Total Home Broadband 40GB pre cap increase would cost $103, instead of $105. That's $2.00

I want a 30 GB plan, with either VoIP or landline - and not spending an arm. My current ISP provides 50GB + VoIP for $79 with 1yr contract. I'm willing to pay more (probably not as much as $103), for less traffic, but better peak time throughput.

I guess it depends where you looking from.

news came from WSJ, then NBR
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/telecom-posts-full-year-profit-388-million-db-99174 

1 | 2 
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

New Air Traffic Management Platform and Resilient Buildings a Milestone for Airways
Posted 6-Dec-2023 05:00


Logitech G Launches New Flagship Console Wireless Gaming Headset Astro A50 X
Posted 5-Dec-2023 21:00


NordVPN Helps Users Protect Themselves From Vulnerable Apps
Posted 5-Dec-2023 14:27


First-of-its-Kind Flight Trials Integrate Uncrewed Aircraft Into Controlled Airspace
Posted 5-Dec-2023 13:59


Prodigi Technology Services Announces Strategic Acquisition of Conex
Posted 4-Dec-2023 09:33


Samsung Announces Galaxy AI
Posted 28-Nov-2023 14:48


Epson Launches EH-LS650 Ultra Short Throw Smart Streaming Laser Projector
Posted 28-Nov-2023 14:38


Fitbit Charge 6 Review 
Posted 27-Nov-2023 16:21


Cisco Launches New Research Highlighting Gap in Preparedness for AI
Posted 23-Nov-2023 15:50


Seagate Takes Block Storage System to New Heights Reaching 2.5 PB
Posted 23-Nov-2023 15:45


Seagate Nytro 4350 NVMe SSD Delivers Consistent Application Performance and High QoS to Data Centers
Posted 23-Nov-2023 15:38


Amazon Fire TV Stick 4k Max (2nd Generation) Review
Posted 14-Nov-2023 16:17


Over half of New Zealand adults surveyed concerned about AI shopping scams
Posted 3-Nov-2023 10:42


Super Mario Bros. Wonder Launches on Nintendo Switch
Posted 24-Oct-2023 10:56


Google Releases Nest WiFi Pro in New Zealand
Posted 24-Oct-2023 10:18









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.







Backblaze unlimited backup