Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




I iz your trusted friend
5846 posts

Uber Geek

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

# 13679 23-May-2007 12:06
Send private message

Hi, I am just curious to find out what's the ruling on porting number that has ported to another telco, then to a 3rd telco?

Situation is like this, I got two numbers, both were Telecom's, the ported to Telstraclear (fax flag, so the TNZ numbers are not a voice reminder saying "number is now with another telco, xxxxxxx"). And if I decided to port my numbers to VFX, will I still able to keep both TNZ and TCL numbers to VFX VoIP? And how about the fax-ability? Will I be able to receive fax?




Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


Create new topic
3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 71862 23-May-2007 12:22
Send private message

chiefie: And how about the fax-ability? Will I be able to receive fax?

Maverick said recently that this function is coming later in the year, no ETA is available at this stage.

EDIT:  Just to clarify...  I am talking about a Fax-to-email service here.

I find this is the most reliable way to receive faxes because of the issues involved with configuring fax machines to share a line with a phone.  There are usually conflicts with Voice Mail as well as other issues, whereas Fax-to-email is bulletproof -- it just works.

Sending National Faxes generally works OK with VFX so long as you have a SPA2102 or other supported device (NOT a PAP2T).

3594 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
WorldxChange

  # 71879 23-May-2007 13:19
Send private message

Porting a number that has already been ported should not be a problem, havn't heard of it being yet as porting is still pretty new, but should not be an issue,
receiving fax generally has been pretty good over our network and we have not had to many issues nationally, faxing and modem traffiv via IP is the hardest thing in a VOIP network to get working consistently but generally national faxing is pretty good, maybe some customers that are using it for faxing could advise as I am probably not an unbiased observer shall we say Wink , faxing internationally through VOIP is a different story as there a number of things which generally cause problems for this, we are working on a few things to improve this at present though. 




Yes I am a employee of WxC (My Profile) ... but I do have my own opinions as well Wink

             

https://www.facebook.com/wxccommunications

 
 
 
 


3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 71901 23-May-2007 14:38
Send private message

chiefie: ...how about the fax-ability? Will I be able to receive fax?

I put some further comments about reception of faxes in my post above Chiefie, in case you missed them.

Whether my comments are applicable depends on whether you wish to have a dedicated fax number or not.  For me, it would be a waste of $7.95 per month as I receive many more phone calls than faxes.  Your situation may be different???



I iz your trusted friend
5846 posts

Uber Geek

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 71904 23-May-2007 14:49
Send private message

we receive fax on very odd occassion. Both our numbers do receive faxes from time to time... if there is an ability at VFX end that can determine the incoming call as fax, and intercept it into Fax->Email (when this is available) then that'll be great. We then can ditch fax, and for future all out going fax be made through Email->Fax (again if this is available).




Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 71907 23-May-2007 15:19
Send private message

chiefie: we receive fax on very odd occassion. Both our numbers do receive faxes from time to time... if there is an ability at VFX end that can determine the incoming call as fax, and intercept it into Fax->Email (when this is available) then that'll be great.

Yes, that's exactly what is in the works as I understand it.  It makes things much easier than needing to worry about whether your machine has run out of paper, or has some other problem... 

chiefie: We then can ditch fax, and for future all out going fax be made through Email->Fax (again if this is available).

I've still kept the fax machine because often I need to sign documents and then fax them out again.  Sending reliability is not 100% through VFX, so you need to be there and check that the fax has actually completed without errors.

This is easy enough to do when sending, but receiving is unpredictable and you might be out somewhere when somebody tries to send you a fax.  After having a FaxAbility number at home with all the hassles involved, I would definitely not go back to that system.  Fax -> Email is MUCH better.



I iz your trusted friend
5846 posts

Uber Geek

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 71908 23-May-2007 15:28
Send private message

As mentioned, is the international faxing still an issue? what may the issue be? I would like to work towards paperless environment. And regarding sending fax with signature, I could think of using a tablet, and ink it on, presumably most incoming fax->email would be in PDF (or option to have it in PDF)?




Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


3267 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 71910 23-May-2007 15:56
Send private message

May years ago already my boss was using a JPG signature to put on electronic faxes sent via his PC.  It is illegal to do that with a signature, but who will know and who will care?




You can never have enough Volvos!


 
 
 
 




I iz your trusted friend
5846 posts

Uber Geek

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 71915 23-May-2007 16:19
Send private message

Niel: May years ago already my boss was using a JPG signature to put on electronic faxes sent via his PC. It is illegal to do that with a signature, but who will know and who will care?


I think it is now acceptable (but I may be wrong)... If it is not legal, then I'd be questioning some of the emails and letters that sent out from government or companies. You don't expect whoever representing the letter, sit down and sign few thousands if not millions of letters to the recipients. All those signatures in the letters are an image inserted to the document and get printed or sent. Of course the provision here is that, the signatures are then used as a form of confirmation of identity and only be used for its rightful purposes.

I found this link regarding the legal requirement for signatures.

Of course you can't use digital signature if the document require a sighted/witnessed signature.




Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 71921 23-May-2007 16:52
Send private message

chiefie: As mentioned, is the international faxing still an issue? what may the issue be?

I think it's caused by time delays and echo on international phone circuits.  We send a lot of faxes to Taiwan, and the problem is particularly bad to there.  Even on an analogue phone line sometimes there are problems, and right now, it's completely hopeless with VFX.

3539 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  # 71924 23-May-2007 16:58
Send private message

Niel: May years ago already my boss was using a JPG signature to put on electronic faxes sent via his PC. It is illegal to do that with a signature, but who will know and who will care?


chiefie: All those signatures in the letters are an image inserted to the document and get printed or sent. Of course the provision here is that, the signatures are then used as a form of confirmation of identity and only be used for its rightful purposes.

Yes but for me to do that, I have to Scan, Manipulate Image to add Signature, and then Fax.

Instead of Print / Scribble / Fax -- which is much faster!

22524 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  # 71965 23-May-2007 19:46
Send private message

Grant17:
I've still kept the fax machine because often I need to sign documents and then fax them out again. Sending reliability is not 100% through VFX, so you need to be there and check that the fax has actually completed without errors.

This is easy enough to do when sending, but receiving is unpredictable and you might be out somewhere when somebody tries to send you a fax. After having a FaxAbility number at home with all the hassles involved, I would definitely not go back to that system. Fax -> Email is MUCH better.


Yeah, thats the only reason I can think of for a paper fax, and photoshop can do the same thing if you have a scanned signature to put on things and send back ;)

Mate got faxability and a panasonic integrated cordless phone and fax, and the stupid thing still rings the handsets on an incoming fax, which really defeats the purpose of having it integrated in my opinion.




Richard rich.ms



I iz your trusted friend
5846 posts

Uber Geek

Mod Emeritus
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  # 71977 23-May-2007 20:10
Send private message

Grant17: Yes but for me to do that, I have to Scan, Manipulate Image to add Signature, and then Fax.
Instead of Print / Scribble / Fax -- which is much faster!


What I meant was, if you have a Wacom tablet or something and if the document is already in PDF, or in Word, you can just digitally sign it (as annotation) save file, and print-to-fax or email->fax. That is how I will like to head towards, no print-sign-fax, and totally go digital.




Internet is my backyard...

 

«Geekzone blog: Tech 'n Chips Takeaway» «Personal blog: And then...»

 

Please read the Geekzone's FUG

 


Create new topic



Twitter and LinkedIn »



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:





News »

Arlo unveils its first video doorbell
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:27


New Zealand students shortlisted for James Dyson Award
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:18


Norton LifeLock Launches Norton 360
Posted 21-Oct-2019 08:11


Microsoft New Zealand Partner Awards results
Posted 18-Oct-2019 10:18


Logitech introduces new Made for Google keyboard and mouse devices
Posted 16-Oct-2019 13:36


MATTR launches to accelerate decentralised identity
Posted 16-Oct-2019 10:28


Vodafone X-Squad powers up for customers
Posted 16-Oct-2019 08:15


D Link ANZ launches EXO Smart Mesh Wi Fi Routers with McAfee protection
Posted 15-Oct-2019 11:31


Major Japanese retailer partners with smart New Zealand technology IMAGR
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:29


Ola pioneers one-time passcode feature to fight rideshare fraud
Posted 14-Oct-2019 10:24


Spark Sport new home of NZC matches from 2020
Posted 10-Oct-2019 09:59


Meet Nola, Noel Leeming's new digital employee
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:07


Registrations for Sprout Accelerator open for 2020 season
Posted 4-Oct-2019 08:02


Teletrac Navman welcomes AI tech leader Jens Meggers as new President
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:41


Vodafone makes voice of 4G (VoLTE) official
Posted 4-Oct-2019 07:36



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.